truebluethroughandthrough Posted 3 November 2016 Posted 3 November 2016 It depends if she swallows, if she does- result -if not, it's all about performance... her performance
truebluethroughandthrough Posted 3 November 2016 Posted 3 November 2016 Seriously tho- results it should always be the most important element in any sport imo
fuchsntf Posted 3 November 2016 Posted 3 November 2016 8 hours ago, carled said: Does the result count over the performance or would you be happy with us playing brilliantly and not getting the results? Do you go to matches to be entertained or see "win at all costs"? Remember how effective Cambridge Utd. (briefly) were playing a horrible brand of football, but it got results? How about the early days of Wimbledon with their mk. 1 "hoofball" up to Fash the Bash? Horribly unpretty but it got results. Thinking back, I'm pretty sure I've been happier when the team has played some scintillating football but we've conceded a goal or just not managed to put away chances and have drawn than when we've ground out a nervy, nasty 1-0 win with 1 chance and then backs to the wall for 80 minutes. The thing is that when the team is at least playing well, you can see hope for results even if you're not getting them right then. When we're playing terribly then you start to wonder if this is the start of the slippery slope. This isn't an "everyone panic!" post at all, but those of us old enough to have lived through the Peter Taylor era may see a few parallels with the way that team flattered to deceive and then crashed and burned. Ranieri is, of course, better than Taylor, but you do have to wonder what dirt Schlupp must have on him to continually get a place in the team ;-) I'd love to be able to ask Ranieri what the (his?) problem is with Gray though. To me he seems to inject a real spark in the team when he comes on. This season there have been very few games (against decent opposition, at least) when we've actually played well. We've had the odd few minutes here and there but generally it's been very hard for us to string any kind of fast, flowing attacking football together and with Mahrez & Vardy continuing to underperform to what we know they can do, it is a bit worrying. Maybe Mendy will make a difference - we'll see. It would be nice to see a bit more control and attacking flair again rather than the dour stuff we seem to revert to at present with Morgan and "Hoof" at the back thinking they are capable of spraying 60 yard balls forward accurately to Vardy. Depends on the game..the period of the season, and Players/teams strengths percieved at the time.. There is no simple singular answer. I am sure Leicester fans will believe..5-8 seasons like Sunderland, then lets hope we get relegated. Doing WBA , Stoke or Southampton, let fate take its course, and see how far the dreams take us.. I really believe this is a pretty well balanced forum, except gameday knee-jerk contradictions and outbursts...but heyho its still fun.
Dan Posted 3 November 2016 Posted 3 November 2016 This is always a tricky one as it can vary so much. Like for example, I enjoyed Leicester 2-5 Arsenal a lot more than I enjoyed Aston Villa 1-1 Leicester., because we actually played quite well in parts of the first game. But it is a results industry. I can take dropping points when we've played OK, it's just when we're handing games to teams that I can't stomach it. Like Man Utd this season, to defend like that I can't accept. I do think ultimately though with Leicester you're not supporting us in the first place because of either. We get it quite good really.
Nalis Posted 3 November 2016 Posted 3 November 2016 Loke a lot of people have insinuated, it varies. If our regular performances are exciting then I'm more than happy to accept to grind out a result on the odd ocassion, such as Copenhagen away.
foxaholic Posted 3 November 2016 Posted 3 November 2016 13 hours ago, Arriba Los Zorros said: I prefer performances, prefer to be entertained because that's the name of the game and as filbertway said eventually that leads to good results. Would not even take if offered a guarantee we'd grind out 1-0s in every game until the end of the season, scoring from a defensive error every game and spending 80% of the game camped in our own half - even if that guaranteed the title and CL. Because I don't think playing like that gets you and glory and plus, I pay to watch that..... Blackpool one of the most entertaining teams in the Premier in the last few years lot of good it did them
foxaholic Posted 3 November 2016 Posted 3 November 2016 Just now, foxaholic said: Blackpool one of the most entertaining teams in the Premier in the last few years lot of good it did them
Izzy Posted 4 November 2016 Posted 4 November 2016 Can someone sum up the last missing 20 hours of this thread please?
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 4 November 2016 Posted 4 November 2016 I refuse to answer on the grounds that it may incriminate me.
shailen Posted 5 November 2016 Posted 5 November 2016 Performances since they are more indicative of future results. If we are not playing well consistently and getting results I doubt this will last into the long run. Same issue arose in our 2014/15 season where we were playing well but not getting results till our great escape and need I say more...
Mark_w Posted 5 November 2016 Posted 5 November 2016 Results easily. Though it's very difficult to be too despondent if we're playing well and losing.
Les-TA-Jon Posted 5 November 2016 Posted 5 November 2016 Ultimately it's results obviously... But in an abstract sense I think it's all about context. If your team is doing well form wise, then performances become more desirable. When your winning all the time you can afford to be a bit greedy and want better football. But if the team's struggling then you're obviously more desperate and results will do! In the Great Escape season, before that final run I think any of us would have traded 'being competitive and losing to fine margins' for some shithouse wins for some much needed points. Of course the irony there being that had our results been better and our performances worse over the course of that season we may never have had the spirit to pull off the escape anyhow
Keith Wellers Tights Posted 5 November 2016 Posted 5 November 2016 Historically, we're a yo yo club. Results first, always. To me a scrappy 1-0 win will always be better than an entertaining 4-5 defeat. Maybe not to watch but to make my day more enjoyable.
Wymsey Posted 5 November 2016 Posted 5 November 2016 Rather win with no bookings and certainly no injuries, but even don't mind if we win and there's numerous bookings - it would show the level of intent the team wanted to win the game either way albeit in a more old-fashioned style for the latter. Certainly how referees perceive what is a foul/how bad it looks to them has somewhat slightly changed our approach a bit, and certain players appear to be more cautious in terms of their style.
adejo92 Posted 5 November 2016 Posted 5 November 2016 Results - All day long. what good is playing great and being at the bottom? much rather play poor and loose. luckily last season we had results and performance.
Max Wall Posted 5 November 2016 Posted 5 November 2016 In an ideal World, Man City away style performance and result please. In reality, result every time.
Chico1958 Posted 5 November 2016 Posted 5 November 2016 Man City, last years performance Man Utd, the year before result If I'm smiling after the games over, I don't care whether it's the result or the performance that's done it.
awaydays Posted 5 November 2016 Posted 5 November 2016 Priority is a good day with friends as if it was all based on results or performances half of us wouldn't still be here we'd have pissed off long ago.
Harry - LCFC Posted 5 November 2016 Posted 5 November 2016 The result always matters more than the performance
Kitchandro Posted 5 November 2016 Posted 5 November 2016 I go to matches to be entertained. I enjoyed the match last season where we lost 5-2 to Arsenal because it was a good game. If you watch football for the results only I don't know how you've coped being a Leicester fan all your life.
Kitchandro Posted 5 November 2016 Posted 5 November 2016 On 03/11/2016 at 09:09, AKCJ said: 'Performance' over results = Spurs I don't see what's good about a performance if you put 300 passes together and get nowhere near the goal. What Spurs don't realise is that is actually quite boring.
Foxbythesea Posted 5 November 2016 Posted 5 November 2016 Results person defiantly. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter if you play good or bad, you are only going to do well, in the league or cup etc, if you win games. It is nice to see good football being played though.
HighPeakFox Posted 5 November 2016 Posted 5 November 2016 24 minutes ago, Foxbythesea said: Results person definitely. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter if you play good or bad, you are only going to do well, in the league or cup etc, if you win games. It is nice to see good football being played though. Fixed for you
Russell sprout Posted 5 November 2016 Posted 5 November 2016 I go to watch my team win every time,regardless of opposition, yes it's more hope than expectation some games, but I don't care how we get the job done, if it's in an entertaining way like the palace game then happy days,but as long as we win I don't care, on the flip side,when we lose,it becomes about the performance, to me if we can play bad and win performance isn't really relavent,it's how you perform in defeat that raises a talking point
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.