Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
DJ Barry Hammond

Brexit Discussion Thread.

Recommended Posts

On Monday, June 05, 2017 at 21:47, SMX11 said:

Pretty sure all special interest groups will moan like hell if you try and take away subsidies, but New Zealand's experience tells me that the large majority will be fine assuming they are meeting the needs of consumers. It is up to the farmers to adjust what they do to be globally competitive and they will succeed. 

Subsidising farmers, is the nature of the beast, world wide.....Globally competitiveness Doesnt  lie in their individual hands...Society needs them and unlike other businesses couldnt afford to see the Various  farmers life Die. Like doctors and nurses...

Hotels, Restaurants....fk em. Not farmers..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Strokes said:

Because it is lol 

Shhhhh. Tell everyone we'll stay in the eu if the deal we're offered is bad.  

 

Best negotiation tactics eu. Sure to play the reverse psychology card and make them offer us a great deal! 

 

Maybe not... :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Countryfox said:

 

Too small to read ...    but it looks pretty.   

Get some glasses. ;) Updated with a bigger version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Webbo said:

Have you got a graph from last year?

Nobody had voted for Brexit in the corresponding period last year. Now where is my £350 million a week for the NHS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Steven said:

Nobody had voted for Brexit in the corresponding period last year. Now where is my £350 million a week for the NHS?

We haven't left yet, remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

The International Monetary Fund has revised up its UK growth forecast for the second time in three months after admitting that the performance of the economy since the Brexit vote last year had been stronger than expected.

In its half-yearly World Economic Outlook, the IMF said it now envisaged the British economy expanding by 2% in 2017 – making it the second fastest-growing advanced economy after the US..

 

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/apr/18/imf-ratchets-up-uk-economic-growth-forecast-to-2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, theessexfox said:

How can we have the lowest growth in the EU and be the second-fastest growing economy after the US, which statistics are actually reflective of the situation? 

Steven's figures are for the first quarter of the year, ignoring the last 3 quarters of last year. It's selective use of statistics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Webbo said:

I don't understand. My memory is that many Brexiteers were questioning the voracity of the IMF during the referendum campaign and yet are using the same organisation to justify the Brexit vote after the event. :blink: :huh:

 

Maybe the IMF are always wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, theessexfox said:

How can we have the lowest growth in the EU and be the second-fastest growing economy after the US, which statistics are actually reflective of the situation? 

For the record we have the lowest growth among the G7 countries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, theessexfox said:

How can we have the lowest growth in the EU and be the second-fastest growing economy after the US, which statistics are actually reflective of the situation? 

 

@Steven's figure is an actual figure for the first quarter of 2017

@Webbo's figure is an IMF forecast for the whole of the year 2017.

 

This is arguably the most important bit of Webbo's article:

"“The 0.9 percentage point upward revision to the 2017 forecast and the 0.2 percentage point downward revision to the 2018 forecast reflect the stronger-than-expected performance of the UK economy since the June Brexit vote, which points to a more gradual materialisation than previously anticipated of the negative effects of the United Kingdom’s decision to leave the European Union,” the IMF said.

 

In other words, UK growth has surprised the IMF with its resilience since the referendum. They still expect a downturn, but now expect it be a slower process than before.

Steven's figure, based on actual data and not a forecast (though data that might be adjusted) may suggest that the IMF is already being proved wrong - or it may be a blip and growth may be higher next quarter.

Either way, you need at least a couple of quarters to identify a trend.....the next set of quarterly data will be interesting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Alf Bentley said:

 

@Steven's figure is an actual figure for the first quarter of 2017

@Webbo's figure is an IMF forecast for the whole of the year 2017.

 

This is arguably the most important bit of Webbo's article:

"“The 0.9 percentage point upward revision to the 2017 forecast and the 0.2 percentage point downward revision to the 2018 forecast reflect the stronger-than-expected performance of the UK economy since the June Brexit vote, which points to a more gradual materialisation than previously anticipated of the negative effects of the United Kingdom’s decision to leave the European Union,” the IMF said.

 

In other words, UK growth has surprised the IMF with its resilience since the referendum. They still expect a downturn, but now expect it be a slower process than before.

Steven's figure, based on actual data and not a forecast (though data that might be adjusted) may suggest that the IMF is already being proved wrong - or it may be a blip and growth may be higher next quarter.

Either way, you need at least a couple of quarters to identify a trend.....the next set of quarterly data will be interesting. 

Conveniently after the next election. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, theessexfox said:

@Webbo @Alf Bentley

 

Thank you - I guess there's only so much you can read into quarterly figures and predictions - the impacts will become much clearer over 2-3 years I'd imagine.

It'll probably be at least 10 years before anyone can say definitively and then people will still disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Steven said:

Conveniently after the next election. :rolleyes:

 

True but, to be fair, Labour barely mentioned Brexit and its potential economic impact during the election. Presumably they didn't want to draw attention to the issue as a potential vote-loser.

 

The debate about Brexit (biggest issue for decades) was pathetic. The Tories just used it to support their claim to "strong and stable leadership" without saying much else. Lib Dems and Greens called for a second referendum (a stupid policy at this point IMHO as most people just want the Brexit process to proceed - and will then doubtless react depending on what, if anything, is negotiated). Labour announced a good Brexit policy....then chose not to mention it again for electoral reasons.

 

Pathetic, irresponsible and dangerous on all sides......though possibly inevitable. Time to await events, impact - and public reaction to them now. 

 

 

15 minutes ago, theessexfox said:

@Webbo @Alf Bentley

 

Thank you - I guess there's only so much you can read into quarterly figures and predictions - the impacts will become much clearer over 2-3 years I'd imagine.

 

The short to medium-term impacts will start becoming clearer much quicker than that, I reckon - probably within months, depending on how well or badly the negotiations are going.

 

As Webbo says, the argument as to whether it is a good idea in the long-term won't be resolved for decades, though.

The saner Brexit supporters accept that the UK will probably suffer significant economic and social disruption for the next 2-5 years - might be moderate and containable, might be utterly disastrous.

However, they can still claim that the UK will be in a stronger position in the long-term when all the short-term disruption is dealt with, we have a new global role, multiple trade deals with US/China/India, better competitiveness etc.

I don't believe they're right about that, but it won't be proven either way for at least 10-20 years.....by which time I'll be dead or decrepit! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Put this in the election thread but it's more of a Brexit thing:

 

Should the government agree to negotiate on a cross-party basis on what Britain's preferred strategy on Brexit should be?

 

Ken Clarke mentioned it on the election coverage. As he said, there are divides within the main parties on Brexit so it is less of a party political issue.

 

Theresa May asked for a mandate to carry out her vision of Brexit but didn't get it. 

 

We know the DUP want a softer Brexit, at least where N.I. is concerned, but should a party that represents <1% of voters get such a big say?

 

There are divisions within the Conservatives on the best approach to Brexit.

 

What happens if the Tories remove May mid negotiation? 

 

There isn't a crystal clear picture what voters want, but it's reasonable to say results suggest there isn't huge support from a referendum re-run, nor is the idea of a "Hard" Brexit particularly popular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...