Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
stu

Adrien Silva - Terms Agreed

By stu, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

foxinsocks

foxinsocks

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, walkerleeds said:

Well I for one can't wait for Andy King to become first choice centre mid this year.

Hmmmm

for some reason I don't get we have sold our playmaker.

 

Ndidi and James are fine - but neither has the range of passing of drinky.  

 

So boys and girls - we need either iborra or silva to step up to the plate and be our playmaker.... or we are doomed.

 

Now I thought silva looked promising...  yet, If the silva transfer is w@ankered then we have reduced our chances of success.... does any one know if iborra can pick a pass?

 

When will we know about silva (we ant the player and I expect sporting want the money)

foxinsocks

foxinsocks

Posted
Posted
Just now, Everygamefox said:

Rudkin is the manager of this department. 

Why it went wrong is irrelevant, he holds overall responsibility and therefore he must walk if this deal falls through.

can we sort a chant out for saturday?

Koke

Koke

Posted
Posted

If he wasn't coming Sporting wouldn't have omitted him from their CL squad. He is/was their captain so they must be pretty damn certain he's going. 

 

Adrien won't play against Chelsea anyway so it won't really matter when he arrives this week.

Cincinnati Fox

Cincinnati Fox

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, foxinsocks said:

can we sort a chant out for saturday?

If it goes through...

Jonny Rudkin went to Lisbon in Vichai's helicopter 
He came back with a super star called Adrian Silva

 

if it falls through....

 

norwichfox

norwichfox

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, simFox said:

Went for a dump,came back, still not confirmed. Running out of stuff to do.

Take 4 strong laxatives...will take your mind off the transfer issues :o

the fox

the fox

Posted
Posted

If I said it once, I said it a million times! Drinky is overrated!

 

The team isn't losing much, now we are hitting 2 birds with 1 stone, having a box to box means that okazaki can be dropped, that's like upgrading two positions

foxinsocks

foxinsocks

Posted
Posted
Just now, Everygamefox said:

If it goes through...

Jonny Rudkin went to Lisbon in Vichai's helicopter 
He came back with a super star called Adrian Silva

 

if it falls through....

 

did go to lisbon in the helicoptor...

Off topic - but it looks like Kirstie gallagher was more drunk at 11am than rooney was

1972 Fox

1972 Fox

Posted
Posted

As said previously, I hope me and others are panicking over nothing here.

 

But if this deal does not go through we really have proved ourselves to be shambolic with our transfer administration. Drinky wouldn't be allowed to leave unless we got Silva in as a replacement. DD ends up at Chelsea but somehow we manage to fail to get Silva in despite agreeing the deal with him and SCP?

foxinsocks

foxinsocks

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, the fox said:

If I said it once, I said it a million times! Drinky is overrated!

 

The team isn't losing much, now we are hitting 2 birds with 1 stone, having a box to box means that okazaki can be dropped, that's like upgrading two positions

overrated or underrated (clearly we disagree on that) ...  but we don't have another to play his role unless silva or iborra can do it.

simFox

simFox

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, vanity said:

Your position conveniently ignores the fact that Rudkin wasn't in control of the behavior of the other sides. Chelsea came up with an acceptable bid late. Then Sporting changed the terms of the deal late. It is lazy to blame Rudkin based on nothing but speculation, especially with Sporting's management being difficult, well-known pricks. Late changes meant paperwork needed to be changed. Likely quite a bit of paperwork. Rudkin just had an outstanding window, we stole a march on Tottenham and got an incredible price on Maguire, we didn't engage in any of the overheated, overpaying BS other clubs did, we got 35 for Drinky, who we all really appreciate but who just about nobody would've paid 35 mill for, I mean, good outcomes left and right -- we added 6 players who could realistically start games for us.

 

If anything is pathetic and embarrassing, I think it is our posters crapping on Rudkin all the time without having any sense for his degree of responsibility for problems.

He does look a bit weasel like though. Therefore he deserves it.

foxinsocks

foxinsocks

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Blue Fox 72 said:

As said previously, I hope me and others are panicking over nothing here.

 

But if this deal does not go through we really have proved ourselves to be symbolic with our transfer administration. Drinky wouldn't be allowed to leave unless we got Silva in as a replacement. DD ends up at Chelsea but somehow we manage to fail to get Silva in despite agreeing the deal with him and SCP?

what sort of people are we... IMO there are far too many people in football who only know about football (sic) - most clubs are run by people who are beyond their level of competence... I have seen better discussions on here about contract issues that it seems those who deal with contract are able to grasp

 

the fox

the fox

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, foxinsocks said:

overrated or underrated (clearly we disagree on that) ...  but we don't have another to play his role unless silva or iborra can do it.

Looked decent in all 3 games, losing to arsenal because of a naive mistake and giving united a run for their money.

ZeGuy

ZeGuy

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, UPinCarolina said:

Some farce this has turned out to be. What a shambles.

You just feel it in your bones, don't you? That this has somehow fallen through?

It's fine. 

the fox

the fox

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, chicagofox said:

We didn't really give United a run for their money, did we?

Are you sure? the game would've ended 2-1 if kingy scored (but you can say the same about lukaku's pen)

 

They steam rolled the last two teams, we let two goal in because of poor corner defending and an offside goal. Mahrez was pretty much alone with the keeper and he could've buried at least one if okazaki or gray passed it to him.

sylofox

sylofox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, simFox said:

me too, it could easily be speedo error, just from different tyres.

 

1 hour ago, Swan Lesta said:

 

What? I'd love to see that ticket - was it in an average speed area or on a smart motorway or was it speed gun or marked / unmarked car? 

 

Because thats ridiculous and I'd genuinely have appealed that!

It was a marked vehicle on a motorway bridge.

 

I did appeal as a mate is a solicitor. He advised me to ask for the camera calibration certificate as most are out of date. Just my luck it had just been calibrated.

 

It was him that told me the 10% is not law the limit is the limit no matter what. At the time northants was zero tolerance. My only hope was an out of calibration camera.

 

I still got the fine but northants at the time recommended a speed awareness course if less than 10% over the limit. So no points and had to give up a Saturday morning.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...