Captain... Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 I would love Mahrez to start tonight and score the winning goal for us. Then in the press conference just shrug it all off the way he shrugs off defenders.
ZeGuy Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 32 minutes ago, Stevosevic said: It's 65m plus a player Then I honestly think he's gone. Curious to know who the player is.
jmono84 Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 £75m and they can write off the shit buy back clause for nacho then it’s a maybe 1
MCFC Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 1 minute ago, frany104 said: What a ridiculous comment. No he wouldn’t. He’s bang average and been made to look good from the players around him. Bang average players don't survive under Pep Guardiola, and certainly don't play in his starting XI.
desertfox2 Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 5 minutes ago, smr said: If that is their final offer then he's staying until the Summer. Why would we have a player who they don't want, who we haven't scouted? We sign players who we have time to do our homework on and players that will fit in with the club. Besides we've got Gray and Diabate with the latter looking a real prospect and the former definitely room for improvement but a very decent talent. Obviously I'd change my stance if it were someone like KDB but that it will be one of their meh reserve players. 55m + a player was their ''final offer'' before the 65+ a player ''second final offer''.
Suzie the Fox Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 Delph is ok. But not needed. Mangala can go do one... Only players that id like to see as part of the deal is Jesus, Aguelo or De Bryne and im damned sure that isnt going to happen. SO Its £80m or gtfo (And tbh after all this shit and hearsay i feel its best interest of himself and the club he goes.)
EnderbyFox Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 Quote Manchester City have submitted a third bid for Riyad Mahrez. The offer is believed to be in excess of £60million – although it still falls someway short of the £90million British record valuation that Leicester City were quoting on Tuesday. Mahrez is desperate to make the move before the transfer window closes having submitted a transfer request. It is possible that City will return with yet another offer, if this one is rejected, and the make-up of the latest bid is unclear amid claims they may also be willing to offer Leicester a player. City have so far failed with offers of around £50million and £55million for the Algerian international who is not in the squad for Leicester’s Premier League fixture away to Everton this evening.
ZeGuy Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 3 minutes ago, MCFC said: Delph's an excellent player, bar us, United, Chelsea and Spurs I think he'd get into the starting XI of every team in the league. Only problem is his injuries. Thank a lot. Now I have problems with my project manager who wants to know why I laughed out that loud.
Gerard Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 £65m and let us have Iheanacho on a free (no more payments). That would certainly get this over the line. They'll only give us some garbage and think they're doing us a favour.
frany104 Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 1 minute ago, MCFC said: Bang average players don't survive under Pep Guardiola, and certainly don't play in his starting XI. Precisely why he’s trying to offload him now...... If the player is him!
Stevosevic Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 Delph isn't needed. The club won't see that as tempting.
MCFC Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 For what it's worth I'd be shocked and a little appalled if we gave you Bernardo for Mahrez, even on loan. Bernardo ha played brilliantly of late, 3 goals and 6 assists in about 6 starts since the derby.
MC Prussian Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 (edited) £50m & Raheem Sterling and it's a fair deal. Edited 31 January 2018 by MC Prussian
sylofox Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 1 minute ago, jmono84 said: £75m and they can write off the shit buy back clause for nacho then it’s a maybe Write off the buy back is a bad idea. While the buy back is in place City can't make a bid for him.
richardsfoxes Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 Jesus christ, what a ****ing mess. Thought we'd get out unscathed, the teams already weaker from losing Slim and Ulloa, Mahrez would be devastating i cant see us letting him go unless we have a replacement in place surely.
ZeGuy Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 (edited) Don't get what people have against Delph. He is actually more than a decent player and it's not like we're loaded in this area. Delusion of grandeur. Edited 31 January 2018 by ZeGuy 2
Buce Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 (edited) From the Guardian: Sky are reporting that Leicester have received a fourth bid for Riyad Mahrez from Manchester City. It includes an as yet unnamed player and is said to be worth a total of £65m. Will that tempt the Foxes into selling? They have less than eight hours to decide... So which is it? Edited 31 January 2018 by Buce
foxfanazer Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 Other than a couple of their younger players there’s nobody I’d want. Apart from the unrealistic
MCFC Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, frany104 said: Precisely why he’s trying to offload him now...... If the player is him! I'd be very surprised, that leaves us with two left-backs, one of whom is injured until April and the other of whom is a diminutive Ukrainian who shares a name with a meerkat. Edited 31 January 2018 by MCFC
desertfox2 Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 If they bid 75m I think its Au revoir Mahrez. And goodbye chances of Europa league unless we pull a rabbit out of the hat as a replacement.
Nick Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 1 minute ago, MC Prussian said: £50m & Raheem Sterling and it's a fair deal. Sure but surely that would never happen? 1
foxfanazer Posted 31 January 2018 Posted 31 January 2018 Just now, ZeGuy said: Don't get what people have against Delph. He is actually more than a decent player and it's not like're loaded in this area. Delusion of grandeur. Who does he replace though?
Recommended Posts