DerbyshireFox Posted 2 December 2018 Posted 2 December 2018 Cracking first half, much better than the Chelsea Fulham snooze fest!!
Md9 Posted 2 December 2018 Posted 2 December 2018 Hopefully dier gets sent off 2 mins into the second half and spurs go on to lose 6-2
theessexfox Posted 2 December 2018 Posted 2 December 2018 Both played brilliantly in patches and defended so rashly in others, Son has dragged Spurs back into it.
KingsX Posted 2 December 2018 Posted 2 December 2018 3 hours ago, Matt said: Tbh didn't we (Our great, late Chairman) make similar statements, claims, aims and visions? Leicester City: Billionaire owner 'will spend £180m' to make top five - https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/27387616 We made them reality and surpassed them, earlier than planned but the claims were there - did other clubs have such a chip on their shoulder regarding it? The message on Watford's banner said it all yesterday, we (Vichai) allowed others to dream, allowing others to aspire, give them hope, prove it could be done. Fair play to Wolves for these aims, aslong as it's not at a cost to us I hope they do achieve something. My problem is Fosun taking a stake in Mendes’ agency and then obtaining his players to create a “PL squad as agent’s shop window”. I didn’t realize just how bad it was until the recent der Spiegel article. To me that is an intolerable conflict of interest, resulting in unfair advantage. It’s distressing that the League choose to look the other way. I am not bothered about their ambitions. It’s the Chinese ownership’s method of achieving that ambition that has me hoping they get thrashed every time out. Cue the Bear to pop up and cite a clean bill of health (which by now is every bit as tiring as the bantz). But the facts are there to see. I can’t be the only one.
Finnegan Posted 2 December 2018 Posted 2 December 2018 Son is a ****ing disgrace. Trips himself up with the ball. Such a diving cheating ****. 1
Md9 Posted 2 December 2018 Posted 2 December 2018 Still can’t see any touch on son ? can you banned if it’s seen as a dive after the game? 1
ARTY_FOX Posted 2 December 2018 Posted 2 December 2018 How can they even try to justify sons dive? Retrospective action surley? 1
Max Wall Posted 2 December 2018 Posted 2 December 2018 Obviously my eyes didn't fail me then. Looked a dive as it happened and looks a dive in slow motion. 1 1
UniFox21 Posted 2 December 2018 Posted 2 December 2018 9 minutes ago, ARTY_FOX said: How can they even try to justify sons dive? Retrospective action surley? If on review its shown to be a dive and a penalty/sending off was given I believe they can get retrospectively banned
sylofox Posted 2 December 2018 Author Posted 2 December 2018 10 minutes ago, Max Wall said: Obviously my eyes didn't fail me then. Looked a dive as it happened and looks a dive in slow motion. And would look a dive on VAR. But still some don't want it.
Max Wall Posted 2 December 2018 Posted 2 December 2018 Hahahah great finish Always good when you just want one of the teams to lose and don't care which one.
Rincewind Posted 2 December 2018 Posted 2 December 2018 I was going to say the second Arsenal goal was good but they have just scored a decent third.
Max Wall Posted 2 December 2018 Posted 2 December 2018 This type of game is exactly why the Prem 'product' sells around the World. Entertaining stuff.
Recommended Posts