treer Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-11---offside Law 11 Offside Offside position It is not an offence to be in an offside position. A player is in an offside position if: any part of the head, body or feet is in the opponents’ half (excluding the halfway line) and any part of the head, body or feet is nearer to the opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent The hands and arms of all players, including the goalkeepers, are not considered. A player is not in an offside position if level with the: second-last opponent or last two opponents Offside offence A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched* by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by: interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or interfering with an opponent by: preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or challenging an opponent for the ball or clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent or making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball *The first point of contact of the 'play' or 'touch' of the ball should be used or gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has: rebounded or been deflected off the goalpost, crossbar or an opponent been deliberately saved by any opponent A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball (except from a deliberate save by any opponent) is not considered to have gained an advantage. Surely once the goalkeeper saved the shot, all leicester players are deemed onside? The rule is unclear, as to what constitutes "active play"
urban.spaceman Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 I double dare you to go and post that on The Fighting Cock.
SouthStandUpperTier Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 Just now, treer said: http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-11---offside Law 11 Offside Offside position It is not an offence to be in an offside position. A player is in an offside position if: any part of the head, body or feet is in the opponents’ half (excluding the halfway line) and any part of the head, body or feet is nearer to the opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent The hands and arms of all players, including the goalkeepers, are not considered. A player is not in an offside position if level with the: second-last opponent or last two opponents Offside offence A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched* by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by: interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or interfering with an opponent by: preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or challenging an opponent for the ball or clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent or making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball *The first point of contact of the 'play' or 'touch' of the ball should be used or gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has: rebounded or been deflected off the goalpost, crossbar or an opponent been deliberately saved by any opponent A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball (except from a deliberate save by any opponent) is not considered to have gained an advantage. Surely once the goalkeeper saved the shot, all leicester players are deemed onside? The rule is unclear, as to what constitutes "active play" Perez has clearly gained an advantage by being in an offside position when the rebound comes back to him. Correctly disallowed.
Sir Shep Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 Looked off side to me whilst Spurs didn’t, but opinions don’t really matter as we won sending half of north London, pundits and the media into a well deserved meltdown
treer Posted 21 September 2019 Author Posted 21 September 2019 3 minutes ago, SouthStandUpperTier said: Perez has clearly gained an advantage by being in an offside position when the rebound comes back to him. Correctly disallowed. that's not right, it has rebounded off the spurs goalie
That_Dude Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 If it ever was a goak correctly ruled out by VAR, then it was this one. Perez was already offside by a mile as the ball came back to him. Clear advantage and nothing to moan about. Can't believe you posted this one, especially today where Spurs had one disallowed for a couple of mm.
Guest Kopfkino Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has: rebounded or been deflected off the goalpost, crossbar or an opponent Looks pretty clear to me
TrentFox Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 I feel like you’ve posted Einstein’s Theory of Relativity and then declared “therefore it is a goal to us”
SouthStandUpperTier Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 1 minute ago, treer said: that's not right, it has rebounded off the spurs goalie It is right. Being offside when the shot came in allowed him to get to the rebound first.
Legend_in_blue Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 I'm amazed our decision went to VAR. What the heck was the linesman doing? Clear offside. Officials are becoming complacent, thinking technology can dig them out of a hole. Well, in this case, it did.
foxfanazer Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 It was clearly offside. I don't think you can really call it another phase of play
moore_94 Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 18 minutes ago, treer said: http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-11---offside Law 11 Offside Offside position It is not an offence to be in an offside position. A player is in an offside position if: any part of the head, body or feet is in the opponents’ half (excluding the halfway line) and any part of the head, body or feet is nearer to the opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent The hands and arms of all players, including the goalkeepers, are not considered. A player is not in an offside position if level with the: second-last opponent or last two opponents Offside offence A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched* by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by: interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or interfering with an opponent by: preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or challenging an opponent for the ball or clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent or making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball *The first point of contact of the 'play' or 'touch' of the ball should be used or gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has: rebounded or been deflected off the goalpost, crossbar or an opponent been deliberately saved by any opponent A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball (except from a deliberate save by any opponent) is not considered to have gained an advantage. Surely once the goalkeeper saved the shot, all leicester players are deemed onside? The rule is unclear, as to what constitutes "active play" I am pretty sure that the Spurs keeper counts as an opponent
Paninistickers Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 Personally, I'm STILL seething over that injury time goal at Molineux. Their striker around 25 yards offside when the ball went wide, thus having a huge advantage to be in position ahead of our defence for the eventual cross
Guest Manini Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 It was quite clearly offside. You could use the footage of this goal to teach somebody what offside is it was that offside.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 We had a goal disallowed? Really?! You'd never believe it listening to the media. Spurs on the other hand...
LinekersLugs Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 Spurs goal that was chalked off was a disgrace if that happened to us I’d expect a riot
davieG Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 There’s no doubt in my mind that according to the current Laws of the game it’s offside. But I do believe that with all these changes and tweeks to the offside law they seem to have forgotten what I always believed was the reason for it’s introduction - To stop players “goal hanging”. Because no way was that anything like goal hanging.
Manwell Pablo Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 47 minutes ago, treer said: http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-11---offside Law 11 Offside Offside position It is not an offence to be in an offside position. A player is in an offside position if: any part of the head, body or feet is in the opponents’ half (excluding the halfway line) and any part of the head, body or feet is nearer to the opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent The hands and arms of all players, including the goalkeepers, are not considered. A player is not in an offside position if level with the: second-last opponent or last two opponents Offside offence A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched* by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by: interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or interfering with an opponent by: preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or challenging an opponent for the ball or clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent or making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball *The first point of contact of the 'play' or 'touch' of the ball should be used or gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has: rebounded or been deflected off the goalpost, crossbar or an opponent been deliberately saved by any opponent A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball (except from a deliberate save by any opponent) is not considered to have gained an advantage. Surely once the goalkeeper saved the shot, all leicester players are deemed onside? The rule is unclear, as to what constitutes "active play" No it’s offside, basic rule knowledge any football fan should posses tbh.
David Hankey Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 And the Offside Law was so simple when I played, change for the better - I don't think so. All it has done is cause controversy and ill-feeling.
Manwell Pablo Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 15 minutes ago, LinekersLugs said: Spurs goal that was chalked off was a disgrace if that happened to us I’d expect a riot It looked it in a certain way I am assuming they used the tech and it showed some part of Son mm offside. I’d be pissed off if it was us though as I was with the England goal in the nations league.
Charl91 Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 18 minutes ago, LinekersLugs said: Spurs goal that was chalked off was a disgrace if that happened to us I’d expect a riot To be fair, I'd be fuming if that happened to us. But I couldn't think of a more hilarious team for it to happen to than Spurs.
Foxes1 Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 If it had been last season it would have counted even with 5 players offside the linesman should have gone to specsavers but obviously didnt
foxfanazer Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 Just now, Manwell Pablo said: It looked it in a certain way I am assuming they used the tech and it showed some part of Son mm offside. I’d be pissed off if it was us though as I was with the England goal in the nations league. If they're consistent with the rule I'm fine with it. You'll get some that go for you and some against. If theyr'e adamant that if VAR shows that any goalscoring part of you is off the goal will be disallowed then they have done their job correctly today
Manwell Pablo Posted 21 September 2019 Posted 21 September 2019 1 minute ago, Foxes1 said: If it had been last season it would have counted even with 5 players offside the linesman should have gone to specs avers but obviously didnt A little harsh as half a second later they were all on again. Easy to make the call with a freeze frame in real time it’s a different matter.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.