Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
happy85

LEICESTER POSTS £67M PRE-TAX LOSS

Recommended Posts

"Without COVID, #LCFC revenue would have been £46m higher at £196m (10% more than 2019), as £33m deferred to 2020/21 (broadcasting £28m, sponsorship £5m) and £13m foregone (match day £4m, TV £9m), meaning the club would have posted £21m loss, similar to prior year."

 

ExJlvp4WgAAv2Zp?format=jpg&name=large

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said:

"Without COVID, #LCFC revenue would have been £46m higher at £196m (10% more than 2019), as £33m deferred to 2020/21 (broadcasting £28m, sponsorship £5m) and £13m foregone (match day £4m, TV £9m), meaning the club would have posted £21m loss, similar to prior year."

 

ExJlvp4WgAAv2Zp?format=jpg&name=large

I think we would have qualified for the champions league without Covid interruption.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said:

"This season’s figures will benefit from #LCFC reaching the last 32 of the Europa League before being eliminated by Slavia Prague. As a comparison, I estimate that #AFC received £17m for getting to the same stage in 2019/20."

 

 

There's some interesting snippets....

 

41m in cash and the underlying revenue numbers looking positive. Outside of a pandemic they'd look very positive. Also as someone has pointed out, in terms of asset value the club is streets ahead of where it was a few years ago and that doesn't just include players.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

The £4million shirt/stadium sponsorship money (87.5% of which we pay back to King Power as a "management fee") is surely something we're going to need to look at soon. Even an average shirt deal would give us a significant boost. 

We need to try and maximise the potential revenue streams whilst we're "relevant", as it were, and tap into the market.

 

The more European football the more exposure for companies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

The £4million shirt/stadium sponsorship money (87.5% of which we pay back to King Power as a "management fee") is surely something we're going to need to look at soon. Even an average shirt deal would give us a significant boost. 

it is 16m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next season should look better with lots of earners off the books, deferred income from those accounts, Chilwell sale, Europe (£15m ish), higher league finish, FA Cup (win the next round and it’s about £2.5m prize money just about, more if you win the whole thing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Babylon said:

Next season should look better with lots of earners off the books, deferred income from those accounts, Chilwell sale, Europe (£15m ish), higher league finish, FA Cup (win the next round and it’s about £2.5m prize money just about, more if you win the whole thing.

We got another £5m for Man Utd getting CL football on the Maguire deal too which will hit 2020/21 accounts. Managed to flog Gray for £2m and save around a million in his wages, not to mention binning Silva, King and Slimani.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Babylon said:

Next season should look better with lots of earners off the books, deferred income from those accounts, Chilwell sale, Europe (£15m ish), higher league finish, FA Cup (win the next round and it’s about £2.5m prize money just about, more if you win the whole thing.

Yeah, it's encouraging (if that's the right term) that a lot of the losses were mainly down to timing rather than recklessness. Next year will hopefully be a better time and everything has run to time, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Babylon said:

Next season should look better with lots of earners off the books, deferred income from those accounts, Chilwell sale, Europe (£15m ish), higher league finish, FA Cup (win the next round and it’s about £2.5m prize money just about, more if you win the whole thing.

But lower profit on player sales, an entire year of no gate receipts, limited income from corporate events at the ground. A full year (rather than just 6 months) of BR’s new contract. Another year of interest payments on debt to King Power and Macquarie.

 

I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the total loss for the 2020/21 season was similar to 2019/20.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, ttfn said:

But lower profit on player sales, an entire year of no gate receipts, limited income from corporate events at the ground. A full year (rather than just 6 months) of BR’s new contract. Another year of interest payments on debt to King Power and Macquarie.

 

I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the total loss for the 2020/21 season was similar to 2019/20.

I'm not expecting us to turn a profit or anything, I mean in the sense of £67m for a few months missed, you'd expect a full year missed to be horrific. But there is a lot of costs in there that won't be in there in the next accounts, and more profit that will. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Babylon said:

I'm not expecting us to turn a profit or anything, I mean in the sense of £67m for a few months missed, you'd expect a full year missed to be horrific. But there is a lot of costs in there that won't be in there in the next accounts, and more profit that will. 

Excluding covid the accounts would actually look okay which when you consider weve just spent 100m on a training ground and land for stadium expansion, improved the playing squad and secured the long term future of the manager (protecting us if he does jump ship) is pretty remarkable.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ttfn said:

But lower profit on player sales, an entire year of no gate receipts, limited income from corporate events at the ground. A full year (rather than just 6 months) of BR’s new contract. Another year of interest payments on debt to King Power and Macquarie.

 

I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the total loss for the 2020/21 season was similar to 2019/20.

19/20 we spent more on players than we have in 20/21. Look at the net spends of both years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have players valued at over £450 million on the books. The loss of £67 million is a loss produced from one of the most

difficult times endured by the sport

The club is backed by a wealthy parent and Cashflow at the moment is not an issue.

The opportunity next season of Champions League football and the financial benefits from on and off the field

activities is hopefully just around the corner

The wage bill is a concern but the depressed level of turnover exaggerates the position at the moment.

if the club is to progress then a bigger stadium is required which hopefully is the next piece in the financial

jigsaw, any money spent here will be capitalised and not greatly impact the profit and loss account.

The club is beginning to cement itself in the top six and then to maintain this more investment will

be needed on the playing side.

In my opinion the club has never been in s better position to transform to the next level and the

next five years will be pivotal

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...