Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, urban.spaceman said:

https://planning.leicester.gov.uk/Planning/Display/20211981
 

Basically an application to continue using the surrounding site as a car park, but there’s an interesting bit I didn’t know about before about the council planning a free hop-on-hop-off electric bus service around the city from 2022. 

That will be decent and will save me a taxi fare to the game every week from city centre.

Posted
On 22/08/2021 at 20:23, UHDrive said:

I would love to see this done in a sustainable way. But the cost/objections and structural remedies that you get with unused railway lines would be astronomical. Plus there's HS2 and other new connecting rail lines being designed and constructed in the north. 

 

Ivanhoe would easily be into 10 figures.

HS2 doesnt serve Leicester, however I am not necessarily supporting this because it goes by a lot of houses and residents have to be considered.

Posted (edited)
On 01/09/2021 at 17:20, Fox in the North said:

First complaint on the planning page. Funnily enough they live at the new development opposite the stadium over the river. Perhaps they should have thought about living near a stadium before they moved in.

 

https://planning.leicester.gov.uk/Document/Download?module=PLA&recordNumber=169099&planId=620245&imageId=34&isPlan=False&fileName=Public Comment 30-08-2021 -Redacted.pdf

 

Most of the complaint I feel is very valid, its a bit unfair to say "tough luck you chose to live there", someone wouldnt be informed of these things before moving in, and a lot of these problems are easily fixed by the club changing their routine.

 

The point was also made if the club had co operated and changed these routines then the complaint probably wouldnt exist.

 

I guess the complainer having hit a brick wall by contacting the club is hoping the council insists these issues are resolved for planning permission to be granted.

Edited by Chrysalis
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Chrysalis said:

 

Most of the complaint I feel is very valid, its a bit unfair to say "tough luck you chose to live there", someone wouldnt be informed of these things before moving in, and a lot of these problems are easily fixed by the club changing their routine.

 

The point was also made if the club had co operated and changed these routines then the complaint probably wouldnt exist.

 

I guess the complainer having hit a brick wall by contacting the club is hoping the council insists these issues are resolved for planning permission to be granted.

Using the planning system to air existing grieivances isn't likely to carry any weight. Nor should it. 

 

Anybody with a modicum of foresight would've done due diligence before making a major residential investment. 

 

Some people like to moan. 

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Spudulike said:

Using the planning system to air existing grieivances isn't likely to carry any weight. Nor should it. 

 

Anybody with a modicum of foresight would've done due diligence before making a major residential investment. 

 

Some people like to moan. 

Totally agree. Have been arranging mortgages for 30yrs and a standard part of the process is local searches and any disputes etc. Either way, what kind of person buys a property nearby and doesn’t realise there’s a football stadium nearby and all that goes with it? 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Chrysalis said:

 

Most of the complaint I feel is very valid, its a bit unfair to say "tough luck you chose to live there", someone wouldnt be informed of these things before moving in, and a lot of these problems are easily fixed by the club changing their routine.

 

The point was also made if the club had co operated and changed these routines then the complaint probably wouldnt exist.

 

I guess the complainer having hit a brick wall by contacting the club is hoping the council insists these issues are resolved for planning permission to be granted.

Was the development not built at the time that the club openly announced tentative plans for this though? 

 

Additionally points 1 & 2 are actually things which would be resolved by the development. 

Posted
4 hours ago, FoxFossil said:

VIP Monorail driven by Big Daddy for FoxesTalk members one step nearer. 

 

I hear those things are awfully loud!

Posted
6 hours ago, Chrysalis said:

 

Most of the complaint I feel is very valid, its a bit unfair to say "tough luck you chose to live there", someone wouldnt be informed of these things before moving in, and a lot of these problems are easily fixed by the club changing their routine.

 

The point was also made if the club had co operated and changed these routines then the complaint probably wouldnt exist.

 

I guess the complainer having hit a brick wall by contacting the club is hoping the council insists these issues are resolved for planning permission to be granted.

I can’t believe that the noise from the generators is stopping them from using their outside space, noise caused by 30,000 people in the area is fine but they draw the line at generator noise

 

the placement of the stage could be moved but will 100 yards change anything? The stage is already pointing away from Watkin Road 

it either points towards the car showroom or points towards the stadium diagonally away from Watkin Road 


Not going to comment on the tannoy situation but can understand about the parking situation, I live around a mile from the Stadium and we get quite a bit more traffic on match days 

Posted
3 hours ago, holyfox said:

Totally agree. Have been arranging mortgages for 30yrs and a standard part of the process is local searches and any disputes etc. Either way, what kind of person buys a property nearby and doesn’t realise there’s a football stadium nearby and all that goes with it? 

a stupid one

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Chrysalis said:

 

Most of the complaint I feel is very valid, its a bit unfair to say "tough luck you chose to live there", someone wouldnt be informed of these things before moving in, and a lot of these problems are easily fixed by the club changing their routine.

 

The point was also made if the club had co operated and changed these routines then the complaint probably wouldnt exist.

 

I guess the complainer having hit a brick wall by contacting the club is hoping the council insists these issues are resolved for planning permission to be granted.

Wouldn't of been informed??? They moved about 400 yards away from a football stadium what did they expect??

Posted
8 hours ago, Chrysalis said:

 

Most of the complaint I feel is very valid, its a bit unfair to say "tough luck you chose to live there", someone wouldnt be informed of these things before moving in, and a lot of these problems are easily fixed by the club changing their routine.

 

The point was also made if the club had co operated and changed these routines then the complaint probably wouldnt exist.

 

I guess the complainer having hit a brick wall by contacting the club is hoping the council insists these issues are resolved for planning permission to be granted.

It's you isn't it?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
16 minutes ago, Fox in the North said:

Just rummaging around the loft and found this old relic of what could have been! 

AA5A29CD-9C76-48B2-A8AD-1929A4067AC0.jpeg

9310FFD0-F286-4C48-BB34-00E2D05F7B70.jpeg

7B460D56-7575-401D-9F84-E1673E8E1B21.jpeg

C0024216-2057-4209-BBFC-66128890EB45.jpeg

Jeez, that really is frightening. Shudder. So incredibly short sighted. 

 

Thank God that never happened as we wouldn't be the club we are now if it had. 

  • Like 1
Posted

If I remember right when they got down to details one of the main reasons this didn’t go go ahead was because the Tigers didn’t want to put any money in just stadium share and pay rent . 

Posted

I remember going to the fan meeting with the chief executive about that, everyone was disgusted and tigers fans were referring to city as bailing out the poor football club. They argued it was needed to keep the club going. Someone asked how much it would actually generate and the answer was £1 million a season. What a price to pay it would have been.

 

And look now, we're worth about 10x what tigers are and they can't even find a buyer!

Posted
On 01/09/2021 at 17:50, Pliskin said:

“Noise generated by the stadium” righto, we will whisper from now on. 

Just like a library ……….

Posted

Given the extra 8000 capacity, how much do you think realistically, we can increase our wage budget by, so we're still not breaking FFP restrictions?

 

200k a week?

Posted
4 hours ago, Fox in the North said:

Just rummaging around the loft and found this old relic of what could have been! 

AA5A29CD-9C76-48B2-A8AD-1929A4067AC0.jpeg

9310FFD0-F286-4C48-BB34-00E2D05F7B70.jpeg

7B460D56-7575-401D-9F84-E1673E8E1B21.jpeg

C0024216-2057-4209-BBFC-66128890EB45.jpeg

That looks very like the King Power with a few Tigers logos here and there. What is with the Plymouth Argyle is it a match program?

Posted
2 minutes ago, WarehamFox said:

That looks very like the King Power with a few Tigers logos here and there. What is with the Plymouth Argyle is it a match program?

Yep a home game against Plymouth

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...