Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, LestaLad said:

@Ashley Sheff Utd are now rumoured to be interested. Any progression with us being linked to him? 

It’s so frustrating, isn’t it. The thing is, it’s so so easy to get things sorted, to put our club back in good working order. We dilly dally, mess around, and we’re behind the curve once again!

It’s so simple. Football clubs aren’t ‘real life’ hard work. They really aren’t!

Get a new manager in.

Get in the cream of the free transfers.

Sell / get the dross off our wage bill.

See what we have left to pick up a couple of up and coming strikers 

 

Just get on with it ffs

  • Like 4
Posted
1 hour ago, CloudFox said:

I could definitely see that move happening. If I had to choose to keep one of Coady, Faes, and Vestergaard though, I'd keep Coady.

Vestergaard for me at least he has a few pros half decent range of passing, half Decent in the air and probably the cheaper option…. Coady on the other hand I can’t think of many if any positives, he’s labelled as a ball playing defender but I think Amartey looked better on the ball and probably had better distribution which says it all… he’s weak, Slow and for a cb he’s poor in the air! I guess the one straw clutch would be he’d be good to have in the dressing room and around the youngsters as he does seem like a model pro… just a shame he’s pish lol 

  • Sad 1
Posted
15 hours ago, CloudFox said:

I could definitely see that move happening. If I had to choose to keep one of Coady, Faes, and Vestergaard though, I'd keep Coady.

I think we're stuck with Vesty for life. In an ideal world, they all go

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, lcfc_forever said:

Linked with Oxlade-Chamberlain, guess it would be a free transfer

 

Is he still with that bird from little mix, guess that's an upgrade from Becky. But do we learn nothing. Just another BDR, ayew etc, no value for money and past his best.

  • Like 2
Posted
14 hours ago, dbtcity said:

Vestergaard for me at least he has a few pros half decent range of passing, half Decent in the air and probably the cheaper option…. Coady on the other hand I can’t think of many if any positives, he’s labelled as a ball playing defender but I think Amartey looked better on the ball and probably had better distribution which says it all… he’s weak, Slow and for a cb he’s poor in the air! I guess the one straw clutch would be he’d be good to have in the dressing room and around the youngsters as he does seem like a model pro… just a shame he’s pish lol 

Sounds like Vesterguard 

Posted
18 minutes ago, lcfc_forever said:

Linked with Oxlade-Chamberlain, guess it would be a free transfer

 

And people still try to defend this mob, that we learn lessons blah blah blah, our recruitment strategy is absolutely fecking horrendous. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, lcfc_forever said:

Linked with Oxlade-Chamberlain, guess it would be a free transfer

 

Dufkin please leave now. No more Pension Top-ups.  This Recruitment Team are abhorent.

  • Like 3
Posted
8 hours ago, lcfc_forever said:

Linked with Oxlade-Chamberlain, guess it would be a free transfer

 

Just lazy journalism? We were linked to him in January and they want him out their club = rumour. 

 

Not buying it, we don't even know who the blinking manager is yet! But if true, this would be an indicator that Ruud is likely to stay. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

🚨 Leicester City are weighing up a move for Leeds United striker Sam Greenwood (23), who has one year left on his contract at Elland Road
[@MailSport]

#LCFC #leicester #RVN #Nistelrooy #leicestercity

That's a new low even for us!

Edited by fox_favourite
  • Sad 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...