David Hankey Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Lawro has us down for a 1-1 draw, but what does he know?
Ian Nacho Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Schmeichel Justin Amartey Ndidi Thomas Albrighton Soumare KDH Lookman Maddison Daka 1
Tommy Fresh Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Expecting us to get a good beating here based on Rodgers seemingly never learning anything on how to approach these. But it would be typical City to actually pull of an unbelievably big win here when we aren't expecting much.
Raj Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Currently we have not one player whom the opposition would fear.
Silebyfox_89 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Kasper Ricardo Amartey Vesty Justin Ndidi Albrighton Madders KDH Lookman Daka 4-1-4-1 enough pace at the back to help Vesty. Ndidi needs to be the destroyer he is to stop their counter attacks. 1
Mark 'expert' Lawrenson Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 15 minutes ago, David Hankey said: Lawro has us down for a 1-1 draw, but what does he know? Plenty 👌🏻 1
Fox92 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 (edited) 16 minutes ago, David Hankey said: Lawro has us down for a 1-1 draw, but what does he know? West Ham been inconsistent of late. Maybe not as much as us but they've still lost games they should have won. But because we've been inconsistent our fans talk as if we're playing top side. West Ham are a decent side but we can still get a result. Edited 13 February 2022 by Fox92 1
teblin Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 6 minutes ago, Silebyfox_89 said: Kasper Ricardo Amartey Vesty Justin Ndidi Albrighton Madders KDH Lookman Daka 4-1-4-1 enough pace at the back to help Vesty. Ndidi needs to be the destroyer he is to stop their counter attacks. I think cags or vesty might play here so we can have more height to defend set pieces.
Mark 'expert' Lawrenson Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Antonio is bound to score against us, let’s go and attack them as we’re always going to concede. Get on the front foot and give them something to worry about, 3-2 win if we were to actually back ourselves, another defeat if we continue with the turgid, pedestrian, safety first set up. 1
The Guvnor Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 2 minutes ago, teblin said: I think cags or vesty might play here so we can have more height to defend set pieces. Vesty 6'5" when standing, 5'5" when jumping for a header is not the answer. 1 1
Popular Post Happy Fox Posted 13 February 2022 Popular Post Posted 13 February 2022 Rodgers has to start Iheanacho and Daka upfront , we need to go all out to get a result , playing one upfront at home would be daft but typical of us 7
Blue-fox Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 3 minutes ago, teblin said: I think cags or vesty might play here so we can have more height to defend set pieces. Might aswell bring in Ronnie Corbett at the back if you’re putting Vestergaard in for his presence in the air. 2
foxinsocks Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 1 minute ago, Mark 'expert' Lawrenson said: Antonio is bound to score against us, let’s go and attack them as we’re always going to concede. Get on the front foot and give them something to worry about, 3-2 win if we were to actually back ourselves, another defeat if we continue with the turgid, pedestrian, safety first set up. I used to go to games with my late neighbour. 60 years a foxes supporter. When we got promoted to the PL we were wondering whcih player we would take form the championship to the prem. Be both agree on shef wed's antoinio - he had score a great goal against us form the right wing - he was forceful. WE didn't go for him - he drifered to forest I think and then on to west ham. How I wish we had hired him. 1
Vestan Pance Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 4 hours ago, CrazyKopCorner said: Games have that distinctively Puel feel about them at the moment. Our current defence isn't that good😉🤣
1972 Fox Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 25 minutes ago, Raj said: Currently we have not one player whom the opposition would fear. Disagree. They will be very wary of Maddison. He's the man to cause them problems. 1 1
foxinsocks Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 21 minutes ago, Silebyfox_89 said: Kasper Ricardo Amartey Vesty Justin Ndidi Albrighton Madders KDH Lookman Daka 4-1-4-1 enough pace at the back to help Vesty. Ndidi needs to be the destroyer he is to stop their counter attacks. I would play justin at CB and thomas at LB. Youri in and madders on wing to replace kevin for this one. Kasper Ricardo Amartey Justin Thomas Ndidi Lookman Youri KDH madders Daka
Fox92 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 13 minutes ago, Happy Fox said: Rodgers has to start Iheanacho and Daka upfront , we need to go all out to get a result , playing one upfront at home would be daft but typical of us I have never understood the obsessions with one up front. Would always be two for me. Vardy/Iheanacho were so good together but Rodgers would rather ditch that partnership to accommodate Barnes but it's not good enough. Two strikers every time for me. 2
Scotch Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Schmeichel Ricardo Amartey Soyuncu JJ Ndidi Tielemans KDH Maddison Ihneacho Daka
Silebyfox_89 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 12 minutes ago, foxinsocks said: I would play justin at CB and thomas at LB. Youri in and madders on wing to replace kevin for this one. Kasper Ricardo Amartey Justin Thomas Ndidi Lookman Youri KDH madders Daka Think Antonio would have a field day with Justin at CB, he's not got heading right since he's been back yet. Also think he only works as a CB in a back 3, not sure if he's played in a 2. 1 1
weller54 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 They're going to bully us as per normal.. What's changed from the last few times we've played them? 1-4.
Royston. Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 13 minutes ago, foxinsocks said: I would play justin at CB and thomas at LB. Youri in and madders on wing to replace kevin for this one. Kasper Ricardo Amartey Justin Thomas Ndidi Lookman Youri KDH madders Daka Is it within the laws of the game to climb on your team mate to gain an aerial advantage?
Aus Fox Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Anyone know if the club or fans are planning anything as a mark of respect to the three supporters we have lost recently? For the lads who gave so much travelling home and away to back the boys, it would be a shame if the club don’t do something today. If they are not, will there be something organised? Scarfs up and When you’re smiling in the third minute would be amazing.
Raw Dykes Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 8 minutes ago, Fox92 said: I have never understood the obsessions with one up front. Would always be two for me. Vardy/Iheanacho were so good together but Rodgers would rather ditch that partnership to accommodate Barnes but it's not good enough. Two strikers every time for me. One up front has nothing to do with obsession - it's just the modern game. If you play with two up front, you have to make sacrifices elsewhere, or be prepared to be dominated in midfield. I don't think it's any surprise that Nacho was dropped when Barnes returned. I think Rodgers quite rightly wanted to return to a back 4. 2
Fox92 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Just now, Raw Dykes said: One up front has nothing to do with obsession - it's just the modern game. If you play with two up front, you have to make sacrifices elsewhere, or be prepared to be dominated in midfield. I don't think it's any surprise that Nacho was dropped when Barnes returned. I think Rodgers quite rightly wanted to return to a back 4. It works if your lone striker is strong and can hold it but we can't. Daka up front on his own is useless. Not strong enough to keep the ball. Plus our wingers don't contribute enough goals.
SpacedX Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 11 minutes ago, Fox92 said: I have never understood the obsessions with one up front. Although it confers other indirect benefits and has been deployed to great success, you need a particular type of striker that is predisposed to it. We don't have that, it doesn't work for us yet we bewilderingly see it time and time again. I agree, I prefer an established strike partnership but it would be nice to have to option to go one up top. 1
Recommended Posts