Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
StanSP

Brentford (A) - Pre Match Thread (18/03/23)

By StanSP, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
Posted (edited)
38 minutes ago, Guppys Love Child said:

That my good man looks just like Rodgers pre-match team notes.

 

Totally incomprehensible sh1t that no one understands and gets no results when the Enter key is hit.  Even a 60Min 'De-Bug' offers no better outcome. Just causes more errors.

 

 

 

 

(Even though it does look a bit Excel to me 🫥😁)

 

It's SQL lol

 

Honestly one of the top 5 nerdiest jokes I've ever posted on here. 

 

Edited by Finnegan
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Dahnsouff

Dahnsouff

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Finnegan said:

 

It's SQL lol

 

Honestly one of the top 5 nerdiest jokes I've ever posted on here. 

 

Is it proper Oracle sql? Or girly SQL Server sql? :ph34r:

Chelmofox

Chelmofox

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

 

It's SQL lol

 

Honestly one of the top 5 nerdiest jokes I've ever posted on here. 

 

And it passed my code review - well done!

  • Haha 1
TJQuik

TJQuik

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Corky said:

I do wonder whether Evans coming back will bring a calmness to the defence. Faes has been reckless lately and probably needed taking out but Amartey coming in wouldn't settle it. 

 

Still won't fix the goalkeeper issue but to be honest we have to stop shots coming in.

Evans will play about 30 minutes before knackering his foot again until the next international break comes around.

  • Like 3
Guppys Love Child

Guppys Love Child

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Finnegan said:

 

It's SQL lol

 

Honestly one of the top 5 nerdiest jokes I've ever posted on here. 

 

Well played Sir..👍

 

I saw the concat, which I've used in Excel and took a guess.

 

I've half heard of it ..'something' Query Language not my area I'm afraid  but still funny.

turtmcfly

turtmcfly

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Dahnsouff said:

Is it proper Oracle sql? Or girly SQL Server sql? :ph34r:

 

GETDATE() suggests the latter. CASTing that to a date seems very, er, wonky though, as does the minor ineffeciency of eschewing of NOT IN for our out of favour CBs, and the potentially confusing (from a (this, at least) human readability standpoint) lack of bracketing of the and/ors for the non-Ward clauses. Unless I've missed a scandal/injury or two it does seem to come with the intriguing possibility of playing three goalies somewhere on the pitch. 

 

  • Haha 2
Dan

Dan

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, filbertway said:

The little upturn in form and keeping pre world cup has certainly benefited us in the long term this season :D

 

This isn't sticking behind a bunch of lads who are trying their best but ultimately not good enough. This is wanting the one thing that is consistently hamstringing the club out of the picture.

 

To be honest, the fact this is even a discussion at this point, it doesn't really matter as it's quite clearly everybody at the club is on LSD or something and have no grasp on reality. So wins or losses, we'll be down next season if not this.

Yep, absolutely opposite scenario to somebody like Bournemouth who are punching a little above their weight if anything. I've never been more certain of anything that we'd have been OK if we'd sacked Rodgers on one of the 15 or so occasions when we should've done.

 

We're definitely approaching the point now though where it's a no guarantee of an upturn if he does go. Just look at the rubbish key figures like Maddison & Evans are spouting. This isn't players not trying for the manager, it's players trying and buying into an awful manager. That's harder to fix if anything really.

 

The club needs a big reset in the summer regardless of what happens the rest of this season. I've hit a point where I think I'd rather get relegated knowing changes were coming than stay up and preserve another 12 months of this where we just end up getting relegated anyway. It's the most joyless I think football's ever been for me. But the ineptness demonstrated by our hierarchy this season tells me the odds of me getting what I hope for are slim. Ideal scenario is we stay up and reset but I'm not all that confident we would.

 

I can't take another year of Rodgers. It's completely unbearable.

Edited by Dan LCFC
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Jattdogg

Jattdogg

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Finnegan said:

 

SELECT TOP (11)

concat([first_name],' ',[surname]) as 'Starters'

 

FROM

[DBO]. [LCFC_SQUADLIST] as 'BrendanzBoyz' 

 

WHERE

[IS_DANNY_WARD] = 'TRUE' 

or ([SURNAME] <> 'Soyuncu'

and [SURNAME] <> 'Vestergaard'

or ([SCORED_LAST_GAME] = 'TRUE' 

and [SURNAME] <> 'Daka')

and [LAST_ACL_TEAR] <= DATEADD(day, -270, CAST(GETDATE() AS date)) 

and [SHAGGED_DAUGHTER] = 'FALSE') 

 

ORDER BY [DATE_LAST_FALLOUT] asc

Lol 

Fook sakes I'm on staycation and have to see sql on a football forum.  

 

I can run but can't hide from it

 

  • Haha 2
Hitesh

Hitesh

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, ozleicester said:

0-4 to the Citeh, Rodgers job safe again.

Impossible that Danny Ward keeps a clean sheet. 1-4...

  • Haha 2
CrazyKopCorner

CrazyKopCorner

Posted
Posted

Difficult team selection 

 

                              Iversen (Ward can't continue) 

Ricardo          Souttar              Evans               Castagne 

                                 Mendy KDH 

Tete                                                            Barnes 

                                 Maddison 

                                  Kelechi 

        

COYB 

Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, turtmcfly said:

 

GETDATE() suggests the latter. CASTing that to a date seems very, er, wonky though, as does the minor ineffeciency of eschewing of NOT IN for our out of favour CBs, and the potentially confusing (from a (this, at least) human readability standpoint) lack of bracketing of the and/ors for the non-Ward clauses. Unless I've missed a scandal/injury or two it does seem to come with the intriguing possibility of playing three goalies somewhere on the pitch. 

 

 

lol

 

It was written in about 30 seconds on my phone in my lunch break, you're just going to have to excuse the formatting. 

 

And yes, it would return 11 players regardless of position. I'll be honest I was more preoccupied with the bit than actually making a working query! 

  • Like 1
KFS

KFS

Posted
Posted

Nigel Pearson back to ****ing basics

 

Iversen

 

Ricardo

Evans

Cags

Castagne (unfortunately)

 

Ndidi

Maddison

KDH

 

Tete

Daka

Barnes


PLAY ON THE ****ING COUNTER

  • Like 1
Clarkeyblue

Clarkeyblue

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, KFS said:

Nigel Pearson back to ****ing basics

 

Iversen

 

Ricardo

Evans

Cags

Castagne (unfortunately)

 

Ndidi

Maddison

KDH

 

Tete

Daka

Barnes


PLAY ON THE ****ING COUNTER

Tete is awful can't start him ahead of Praet 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...