Pliskin Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 That can’t be the team? Surely? Surely you have to go back 3?
TJQuik Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 Just now, beepee1984 said: First comments on that article is over 2.5 hours ago - team has not been announced, it is just a prediction (I hope, please) There's hope for the Wiener Wagon yet
st albans fox Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 2 minutes ago, Nalis said: 7/1 to win, 9/2 to draw. That seems generous. You think ? I haven’t seen anyone of any gravitas predicti anything other than a home win
Chelmofox Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 Be surprised if he started with that. Neither Nacho or KDH doesn't feel right.
Plastik Man Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 3 minutes ago, mod hero said: If that’s the midfield we have no chance. Dean Smith is really getting on my tits now What midfield?! 2
beepee1984 Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 It currently feels like I am preparing myself for torture - you know just strapping myself to the chair just to help those torturing me 1
tickler28 Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 No chance that's the starting XI 😅😅 No way he starts Soumare again...unless he wants us to lose
TJQuik Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 Just now, tickler28 said: No chance that's the starting XI 😅😅 No way he starts Soumare again...unless he wants us to lose It's impossible to distinguish sabotage or incompetence - ****wit's law
Hamilton Fox Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 He’s never leaked a team before so doubt suddenly got inside information.
Sunbury Fox Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 If Smith picks that team then he is more clueless than I thought, and that is very clueless on the evidence of most of his team selections.
sacreblueits442 Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 3 hours ago, adejo92 said: Must be part of Maddisons pre contract agreement. ...did not think you could sign a pre-contract unless you only have 6 months remaining on your contract!!!
fox_favourite Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 (edited) 2 minutes ago, FoxesWalk said: No Maddison or Barnes in starting 11 apparently Both linked with Newcastle.....funny that. Though not suggesting anything...just thought it was coincidence Edited 22 May 2023 by fox_favourite
FoxesWalk Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 Never known this guy be wrong about early team news and he says no Maddison or Barnes: https://twitter.com/fpl_rockstar/status/1660704830199832596?s=46&t=nGRI_cI8sq5OdQnW2Uo-zw
HankMarvin Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 3 minutes ago, Sunbury Fox said: If Smith picks that team then he is more clueless than I thought, and that is very clueless on the evidence of most of his team selections. If he won though, he would be a genius
Bilo Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 2 minutes ago, FoxesWalk said: Never known this guy be wrong about early team news and he says no Maddison or Barnes: https://twitter.com/fpl_rockstar/status/1660704830199832596?s=46&t=nGRI_cI8sq5OdQnW2Uo-zw Not sure what to make of it, but suggests he's hoping for a draw tonight and resting them for a massive push on Sunday.
fox_favourite Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 Well, no goals, no creativity in the side then in a crucial must win game....great tactics.
filbertway Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 That would indicate 3 5 2 if no Maddison or Barnes? Guess we'll find out in 60 seconds
Bilo Posted 22 May 2023 Posted 22 May 2023 Just now, fox_favourite said: Well, no goals, no creativity in the side then in a crucial must win game....great tactics. The only game we've won under Smith was when Maddison was absent.
Recommended Posts