Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
moore_94

Odsonne Edouard joins on loan - Official

By moore_94, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

messerschmitt

messerschmitt

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, South Shire Fox said:

The fact he was like Pele in Scotland shows you how bad their league is. Didnt one of our academy rejects, Billy Mckay, get 25 goals in a season there once?

Filip Benkovic also, was also being called the next Van Dijk. Him and Edouard couldn't get near our first team. It's as though Leicester reserves are bigger than Celtic!

  • Haha 2
HitchinFox

HitchinFox

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Merchant_Banker said:

I thought we were blaming Cooper for this?

Nah. 
 

There was bird poo on my lovely garden furmiture this morning when I sat down for the first coffee of the day.

 

I blamed Rudkin for it. 

  • Haha 2
shen

shen

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, messerschmitt said:

Filip Benkovic also, was also being called the next Van Dijk. Him and Edouard couldn't get near our first team. It's as though Leicester reserves are bigger than Celtic!

So like any other league there are some successes and some duffers. Kramaric was a success at Hoffenheim, does that make the Bundesliga a weak league? Ayoze Perez is ripping it up the La Liga, does that make it a weak league? McTominay and Lookman are recent revelations in Serie A, does that make a weak league?

 

Either way, you yourself acknowledge that Van Dijk was a major success who came via the Scottish league, so no need to belittle it.

  • Like 1
Lesterlad

Lesterlad

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Royston. said:

we just paid this chump to have a few months holiday....

 

still, it was in shitty Leicester so....we win

:brendan:

 

How you can call him a chump and all the other garbage written about him. Is it his fault we gave him stupid money?he played approx 24 mins football in league for us how can you judge him in that? 

AyewJoking

AyewJoking

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Lesterlad said:

How you can call him a chump and all the other garbage written about him. Is it his fault we gave him stupid money?he played approx 24 mins football in league for us how can you judge him in that? 

is this for reals or are you sampling the highest form of wit:wes:

iancognito

iancognito

Posted
Posted
On 29/05/2025 at 02:21, Royston. said:

we just paid this chump to have a few months holiday....

 

still, it was in shitty Leicester so....we win

:brendan:

 

Just like Winks he never made it past the M25 most days.

messerschmitt

messerschmitt

Posted
Posted
On 29/05/2025 at 10:46, shen said:

So like any other league there are some successes and some duffers. Kramaric was a success at Hoffenheim, does that make the Bundesliga a weak league? Ayoze Perez is ripping it up the La Liga, does that make it a weak league? McTominay and Lookman are recent revelations in Serie A, does that make a weak league?

 

Either way, you yourself acknowledge that Van Dijk was a major success who came via the Scottish league, so no need to belittle it.

I'm not, It was a joke based on Sutton's famous quote.

  • 2 weeks later...
damolcfc

damolcfc

Posted
Posted

So is anybody actually "in the know" that can confirm there hasn't been an extension added?

 

Just preparing for my shirt printing via Temu for 25/26

  • Haha 1
Jattdogg

Jattdogg

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, damolcfc said:

So is anybody actually "in the know" that can confirm there hasn't been an extension added?

 

Just preparing for my shirt printing via Temu for 25/26

Surprised we haven't put in a permanent transfer request for 4 years 100k a week and £25 million fee.

  • Haha 1
Claudio Fannieri

Claudio Fannieri

Posted
Posted

This shambolic deal sums up everything that is wrong with the club, to pay a hefty loan fee and cover his wages for a full season and barely play a player who was requested by a manager who was given way too influence on recruitment, especially when the club had reservations about Cooper, just further demonstrates the

complete lack of any coherent plan or strategy, and yet again i will say, people still try to defend it . 
 

We didn’t want to pay a release fee to bring in either Corberan or Rohl but more than happy to throw money away on a player who literally played a handful of minutes. 

  • Like 4
everton carr

everton carr

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

This shambolic deal sums up everything that is wrong with the club, to pay a hefty loan fee and cover his wages for a full season and barely play a player who was requested by a manager who was given way too influence on recruitment, especially when the club had reservations about Cooper, just further demonstrates the

complete lack of any coherent plan or strategy, and yet again i will say, people still try to defend it . 
 

We didn’t want to pay a release fee to bring in either Corberan or Rohl but more than happy to throw money away on a player who literally played a handful of minutes. 

You are just guessing he was requested by the manager who right from the word go clearly didn't rate him would have thought if Cooper wanted him.he would have given him more chances then he did.Worth remembering though he scored 7 from 17 starts in 23\24

  • 1 month later...
RedSoxUK

RedSoxUK

Posted
Posted

To me it looked like a "we'll pay you X after Y amount of PL squad appearances" He ended up on 9, guesswork being 10 would have triggered a bigger fee, which we were probably though is not worth it, but couldn't send him back.

 

Don't think it adds up otherwise on the 'hes doggo' argument because ****ing Daka played 23 times.

 

Someone will actually know what's up though.

  • Like 1
AjcW

AjcW

Posted
Posted
Just now, RedSoxUK said:

To me it looked like a "we'll pay you X after Y amount of PL squad appearances" He ended up on 9, guesswork being 10 would have triggered a bigger fee, which we were probably though is not worth it, but couldn't send him back.

 

Don't think it adds up otherwise on the 'hes doggo' argument because ****ing Daka played 23 times.

 

Someone will actually know what's up though.

He made 9 appearances?!?!?!?!?

Realist Guy In The Room

Realist Guy In The Room

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, RedSoxUK said:

To me it looked like a "we'll pay you X after Y amount of PL squad appearances" He ended up on 9, guesswork being 10 would have triggered a bigger fee, which we were probably though is not worth it, but couldn't send him back.

 

Don't think it adds up otherwise on the 'hes doggo' argument because ****ing Daka played 23 times.

 

Someone will actually know what's up though.

No way he made 9 appearances. 

AjcW

AjcW

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, RedSoxUK said:

Squad appearances! In the PL yeah, think he made like 6/7 overall.

Christ... I must have made at least 3 in that case.

  • Haha 1
  • 3 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...