Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Ryy

Ezechiel Banzuzi

By Ryy, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

AKCJ

AKCJ

Posted
Posted

I hate it when other clubs abuse multi-club ownerships so I can't say I'm disappointed.

 

Also, if I were a Leuven fan,  I'd want my player to be sold to the highest bidder and not to someone else for cheap just because they're owned by the same person.

Tuna

Tuna

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, LVFox said:

Our sister club now actively strengthening clubs we aim to compete with. We are a joke.

 

Circus FC

Imagine if he scores the winner against us lol

 

Peak banter club

  • Haha 1
Mark_w

Mark_w

Posted
Posted
Just now, StanSP said:

Maybe he doesn't want to come to us... 

For what possible reason?

Oh right.

  • Haha 1
Samilktray

Samilktray

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, StanSP said:

Maybe he doesn't want to come to us... 

I'm sorry but in multi club ownership, you go where youre bloody well told and thats final!

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Popular Post
kingpowerout

kingpowerout

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

should have been who we brought in last summer for half the price of Skipp

He's a young, Dutch international and the fact that West Ham are in for him suggests he's caught the eye

  • Like 5
Samilktray

Samilktray

Posted
Posted
Just now, kingpower said:

should have been who we brought in last summer for half the price of Skipp

He's a young, Dutch international and the fact that West Ham are in for him suggests he's caught the eye

Can't help but feel you are to blame personally 

  • Haha 4
JimJams

JimJams

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

I still don’t think we are as desperate for a DM as some other positions (CB, RW, ST) but the fact we aren’t doing anything smart with a deal for him is ridiculous (and expected)

He's not a DM.

ClaphamFox

ClaphamFox

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Mickyblueeyes said:

The name Ezechiel reminds me of the name of the guy from walking dead. 
 

Top and Rudkin also remind me of the zombies from the show.

It reminds me of Pulp Fiction: "The path of the righteous fan is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of incompetent directors of football..."

  • Haha 2
  • Popular Post
MPH

MPH

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

If feels like Leuven have been totally against  any kind of cooperation from the beginning.. 

 

 

 

sack them off. There’s no point to it..

  • Like 7
AjcW

AjcW

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, MPH said:

If feels like Leuven have been totally against  any kind of cooperation from the beginning.. 

 

 

 

sack them off. There’s no point to it..

It's King Power. There will be a point to it and it will likely be a cleaning money related point...

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
JimJams

JimJams

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, MPH said:

If feels like Leuven have been totally against  any kind of cooperation from the beginning.. 

 

 

 

sack them off. There’s no point to it..

And so they should be.

I don't think we'd be too keen if we became a 'sister' to a bigger club elsewhere who expected to get our best players on the cheap and loan us the shit players they don't want.

Whilst we've got nothing from them, what have they gotten from us?

At least if you're in a multi club model with a Man City you get to test drive the South American players they speculate on.

  • Like 1
Mickyblueeyes

Mickyblueeyes

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, JimJams said:

And so they should be.

I don't think we'd be too keen if we became a 'sister' to a bigger club elsewhere who expected to get our best players on the cheap and loan us the shit players they don't want.

Whilst we've got nothing from them, what have they gotten from us?

At least if you're in a multi club model with a Man City you get to test drive the South American players they speculate on.

We gave them Jon Rudkin - they should want to liquidate us. 

  • Haha 3
MPH

MPH

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, JimJams said:

And so they should be.

I don't think we'd be too keen if we became a 'sister' to a bigger club elsewhere who expected to get our best players on the cheap and loan us the shit players they don't want.

Whilst we've got nothing from them, what have they gotten from us?

At least if you're in a multi club model with a Man City you get to test drive the South American players they speculate on.


 

we have sent them a few loan players in the early days. 

MattFox

MattFox

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, MPH said:

If feels like Leuven have been totally against  any kind of cooperation from the beginning.. 

 

 

 

sack them off. There’s no point to it..

Top needs somewhere to wash his euros

Spudulike

Spudulike

Posted
Posted

So, just to get this straight, Rob Dorsett reckons this lad is signing for WHU but Leuven haven't even received an offer :dunno: and it's all Rudkins fault.

 

Confused.com.

coolhandfox

coolhandfox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, MPH said:

If feels like Leuven have been totally against  any kind of cooperation from the beginning.. 

 

 

 

sack them off. There’s no point to it..

Did he ever say he was buying then for our benefit.

Pliskin

Pliskin

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, MPH said:

If feels like Leuven have been totally against  any kind of cooperation from the beginning.. 

 

 

 

sack them off. There’s no point to it..

Is Rudkin not Co operating with himself? 

  • Haha 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...