Poznan34 Posted 7 February Posted 7 February Did we have a shot second half? Most bottom half prem teams would have won that game
goose2010 Posted 7 February Posted 7 February Was never a free kick either We didn't deserve to win but would have been even worse if it was a league game I guess ( although would have been ruled out) We just did nothing in the second half. So probably deserved to lose
Stuntman_Mike Posted 7 February Posted 7 February 1 minute ago, adam said: Shame it's not the 5th round. Would of been ruled out. What a farce of a competition It has to be all or nothing and I'm not saying that based on that decision. It just doesn't make sense 1
Popular Post Lcfc-1992 Posted 7 February Popular Post Posted 7 February Just now, Ricey said: Soumare again for the second goal. So good on the ball, but we can’t keep conceding goals because of his zero defensive concentration. He kept the line and played them offside? Hardly his fault 7
Parafox Posted 7 February Posted 7 February 4 minutes ago, The Doctor said: Gonna be honest, the lino not flagging the most obvious offside you'll ever see does make me think there might be a bit of match fixing in english football Nah just absolutely dogshite officials
J.Lisemore Posted 7 February Posted 7 February Linesman job is to look at the last man. How the **** can you miss Maguire being offside by that far...
Clever Fox Posted 7 February Posted 7 February Soumare they he played well was at fault for the equaliser when he didn't pass the Ball up on their Box. They broke away and scored.
The Doctor Posted 7 February Posted 7 February Just now, sishades said: 4 players clearly offside. 4!!!!!!!!!!!! it is a good defensive line held by us, can't really blame us for the linesman clocking off early. 3
Bordersfox Posted 7 February Posted 7 February 1 minute ago, Buggsteam said: Linesman clearly didn’t want extra time. worst offside I’ve ever seen Can't blame him really, I didn't want extra time either. Utterly shite.
Stuntman_Mike Posted 7 February Posted 7 February Just now, Poznan34 said: Did we have a shot second half? Most bottom half prem teams would have won that game Nope. We gave up and did everything within our power to let them back in it
Haywood_6 Posted 7 February Posted 7 February I'm fuming after that. We weren't good enough second half but that's a clear offside. ****ing disgraceful 1
RedSoxUK Posted 7 February Posted 7 February Blatant corruption, don't get decisions that bad in my daughter's u13 Bronze league honestly.
Fear Of The Fox Posted 7 February Posted 7 February Just now, whoareyaaa said: How is there no VAR Because this sport is corrupted from top to bottom. They change the rules of the sport week in week out. It's a clowns show run by mafia.
Popular Post JimJams Posted 7 February Popular Post Posted 7 February 3 minutes ago, Bob Weasel Fox said: So what did we learn today then? oh that's right absolutely ****ing nothing as he never changes the ****ing team We learnt Okoli should start, that our best midfield is Wilf, Bouba and Elk, and that Thomas should probably get games ahead of VK. 5
KansasFox Posted 7 February Posted 7 February 2 minutes ago, Blueman1967 said: Game change for us when Ndidi want off that's the most encouraging part for me. Gives a glimmer of hope for the league. I think he could turn a couple of losses to draws 2
Dr The Singh Posted 7 February Posted 7 February I'm not happy with the second half, we should be better. I still do not know why we didn't double up on there only threat, Garnacho. 2
foxfanazer Posted 7 February Posted 7 February Had to be that talentless, personality vacuum to get the winner as well
Simonb Posted 7 February Posted 7 February 1 minute ago, Trav Le Bleu said: I honestly think that Hermansen doesn't come for the ball cos it's so blatantly offside. If it was closer, he'd have taken the ball easily. Nah he bottled it
Clever Fox Posted 7 February Posted 7 February Someone is going to have to sue the officials. Otherwise this cheating will continue to happen the smaller clubs. 1
elvisfmcfly Posted 7 February Posted 7 February 12 minutes ago, PhillippaT said: Yes it is - all liquids are wet, it's a property they have that they then transfer to other things. (This conversation seems very familiar ) We got beat again and I couldn’t give less ****s 😂 in other news water is NOT wet.
foxes_rule1978 Posted 7 February Posted 7 February Simples we allowed them to do that, just sat in what you expecting 1
Recommended Posts