Pick one - Ruud or Rudkin?

[LFEFox23]

Rudkin, as much as it pains me. 

[Mike Oxlong]

Gotta be Ruudkin 

[Bilo]

Rudkin, unfortunately.

 

He's obviously useless, but his uselessness is diluted when there's someone competent in the dugout. While RVN is here, there is no hope.

[PAULCFC]

Ruud for me......our troubles are deeper than the manager

[Parafox]

5 minutes ago, Bilo said:

Rudkin, unfortunately.

 

He's obviously useless, but his uselessness is diluted when there's someone competent in the dugout. While RVN is here, there is no hope.

 

Correct. 

 

Even though he's like a rusty rifle. Useless and can't be fired.

 

He's not the one picking the team, setting the tactics or insisting on playing the same crap formation and being clueless regarding in-game changes.

 

The only way RVN could be any worse would be if he played Ward every week.

Edited 8 April by Parafox

[Craig]

Ruud, in the hope the new chap would see through his nonsense after we labour to a 0-0 draw vs Wycombe and get rid. Win win.

[Tommy G]

It’s like picking between getting the shits or throwing up. 

[Tazfox]

Rudkin although it makes me sick. At least he's had some although minimal success at times. Ruud has been a disaster from start to finish 

[jayfox26]

As much as I want Rudkin gone, RVN is totally useless. You can blame the players, you can blame lack of transfers etc but when we are so bad that we can't even score a goal or barely create a chance, that's on the manager. Southampton are wretched and still know how to score a goal. I honestly think we'll lose every game now until the end of the season and it genuinely wouldn't surprise me if we don't score a goal. The rot is set deep and this comes from the manager. 

[TheFiveTime]

[Wasyls Pec Deck]

Does Ruudkin cover both?

[LCFCJohn]

Ruud as if Ruskin goes and we get someone competent, Ruud will follow just after!

[orangecity23]

Rudkin gone first, otherwise he'll just find another Ruud to replace Ruud with. It would be like trying to fill a bucket with water while there is a hole at the bottom.

 

As soon as there is a competent DoF in place, they'd soon get Ruud binned and actually put a bit of care and attention into finding a competent new manager, instead of giving it to Brussel Martin or some other out of work horror show recommended by the only football agent who we are on good terms with..

[Vestan Pance]

Ridiculous question. 

Rudkin and Whelan should go first followed by Ruud, it would be unfair to sack him first as he's culpable, but not like them.

[StanSP]

Ruud. 

 

The problems are higher than him, as bad as Ruud is. 

 

I don't trust Rudkin and his cronies to hire someone better right now. If they go, at least there's a suggestion things might change in trrms of direction of the club, transfers, and sharing of power... 

[Silva Fox]

I should have read the question properly - I automatically assumed we were voting on who should go first!  

[filbertway]

Ruud. At least he's only been terrible at his job for 6 months. Rudkin's been abysmal for nearly a decade.

[accessory]

One way or another, Rudkin has knifed EVERY manager we've had during the last ten seasons.

 

Unless and until he leaves the club, the toxicity will always be there.

[Scotch]

34 minutes ago, Bilo said:

Rudkin, unfortunately.

 

He's obviously useless, but his uselessness is diluted when there's someone competent in the dugout. While RVN is here, there is no hope.

The VISIBLE uselessness is diluted with someone competent in the dugout but he is still running us into the ground behind the curtain and what's happening in the boardroom is IMO far more worrying than what's happening on the pitch. 

[The boy Linacre]

Sorry

Neither

[Pita]

Got to be Rudkin 

[Lionator]

When you’re faced with an illness, 
Do you treat the symptom or the cancer? 
Use your common sense and think

And removing Rudkin is your answer. 

 

[bovril]

Rudkin. Ruud is utterly, utterly useless and seems to be almost actively trying to lose games. I could get better results. And ultimately football games are decided by those on the pitch and in the dugout. 

[PAULCFC]

5 minutes ago, Pita said:

Got to be Rudkin 

Read the question again!

[nnfox]

100% Rudkin has to go.  He runs the football side of the club which is a disaster right now.  He has caused the problems, not Ruud.  Ruud might not be the answer but Rudkin has proven that he's not. 

 

Rudkin leaving will not change things overnight but Rudkin not leaving will change nothing for as long as he's here.