Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Sean Dyche - Yay or Bay?   

559 members have voted

  1. 1. Are you Pro- or Anti-Dyche?



Recommended Posts

Posted

The issue is I don't see him as a long term option. I think he would get us promoted but then the issue is we're in the same situation as the season just gone.

 

He's a better manager than Van Nistelrooy though.

  • Like 2
Posted

I want Rohl as he has more upward trajectory and will play a more exciting brand of football but I won't be crying myself to sleep if we get Dyche, I think he would still give us a good chance of promotion likewise so would Rohl.

 

 

  • Like 4
Posted

I'm somewhere in the middle leaning anti. I think my main gripe is the general strategy coming from the top which sees us move from Rodgers & Maresca to Cooper & Dyche which shows no consistency. 

 

I don't think Dyche would even be that bad, it's just such an uncreative appointment.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, winteriscoming said:

Anti. 
Look abroad. 
Plenty of decent managers available. 

Since when have we looked abroad ? now we don't have a pot to piss in you think we are going to look abroad ? let's at least be realistic

Edited by whoareyaaa
Posted

I'm quite mixed. Think he's better than many treat him as but unsure if it's the correct direction to take.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, whoareyaaa said:

Since when have we looked abroad ? now we don't have a pot to piss in you think we are going to look abroad ? let's at least be realistic at least.

If what they're doing has put ourselves into a position where we don't have a pot to piss in then yes, I would expect us to change our approach. Obviously that won't happen here though where everything else is the problem and we're in the right.

Posted

If you're pro you're voting for this

 

Your future with Dyche assuming he can get us promoted is lower league stagnation or more relegation. I'd sooner take a risk and see some exciting attacking football occasionally hitting the high spots even if it means we continue to yoyo, that is more in the Leicester style. I'm not a fan of the 'Coventry' ( 25 years or so fighting against relegation) style stagnation in the lower half of the league.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, davieG said:

If you're pro you're voting for this

 

Your future with Dyche assuming he can get us promoted is lower league stagnation or more relegation. I'd sooner take a risk and see some exciting attacking football occasionally hitting the high spots even if it means we continue to yoyo, that is more in the Leicester style. I'm not a fan of the 'Coventry' ( 25 years or so fighting against relegation) style stagnation in the lower half of the league.

Take a risk on WHO though?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Fox92 said:

The issue is I don't see him as a long term option. I think he would get us promoted but then the issue is we're in the same situation as the season just gone.

 

He's a better manager than Van Nistelrooy though.

Think you can make the same argument for a young upcoming manager though, we give them a chance and they flourish then they get headhunted for a bigger job and leave us like Enzo and we're in the same position, if i believed in the board to have contigency plans with if they get poached we want X manager because of style of play, age etc etc then i would agree completely but this board have proven they are incapable of doing that.The reason im pro Dyche is that if he is successful atleast we can have a few years of stability to then hopefully be in a position where its not a rebuild job but there is a foundation there we can build on. 

 

Just my 2 cents, as i wanted Rohl but when you actually think about the appointment its so so risky especially with this board. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...