Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, honeybradger said:

We can't moan about the system when we feed it by loaning Mukasa from Man City and sending our own talent back to the U21s.

 

This is just karma for the club.

I agree 100% he should have played rather than loaning in Mukasa.

 

But I don’t think that would change his decision regarding leave for Man U.

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

I agree 100% he should have played rather than loaning in Mukasa.

 

But I don’t think that would change his decision regarding leave for Man U.

 

Maybe not but we would have had a better chance if we had made him feel like a valued member of the squad.

 

The only draw we have over clubs higher in the pyramid is a route to regular first team football but we don't operate that way.

 

Forgetting the money and prestige of Man United, Page probably has a better chance of game time by going there and getting a loan than he does by sticking it out here.

  • Like 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, honeybradger said:

Maybe not but we would have had a better chance if we had made him feel like a valued member of the squad.

 

The only draw we have over clubs higher in the pyramid is a route to regular first team football but we don't operate that way.

 

Forgetting the money and prestige of Man United, Page probably has a better chance of game time by going there and getting a loan than he does by sticking it out here.

Yep his interview of wanting to play a lot this season and be the guy clearly fell on deaf ears for RM who has marginalised him. Really depressing but reality of how low our lowest point will get, and this isn’t it yet 

  • Like 1
Posted

Isn't this the point of having Seagrave though. To develop young talent who cost us nothing and sell for decent money to a club higher up the food chain. 

 

Massively frustrating but surely that's the best way to get ourselves back on a financial even keel, that is sustainable longer term. 

 

Football reality.

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Cropwellfox said:

Yep his interview of wanting to play a lot this season and be the guy clearly fell on deaf ears for RM who has marginalised him. Really depressing but reality of how low our lowest point will get, and this isn’t it yet 

Evans, Hutchinson, Gray, Carr will move onto better things soon as well after clearly not being in the plans.

 

Braybrooke will be looking at the squad around him and thinking he can do better as well.

 

It's going to be a tough 2-3 seasons 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Brizzle Fox said:

Isn't this the point of having Seagrave though. To develop young talent who cost us nothing and sell for decent money to a club higher up the food chain. 

 

Massively frustrating but surely that's the best way to get ourselves back on a financial even keel, that is sustainable longer term. 

 

Football reality.

I agree

 

however it’s frustrating on the other hand because we could build something special with the right blend 

Posted
Just now, Groby Fox 13 said:

I agree

 

however it’s frustrating on the other hand because we could build something special with the right blend 

Oh totally.  Don't disagree. I think that's what we would all like to see, but unfortunately our reality today is a bit different. 

  • Like 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, honeybradger said:

Evans, Hutchinson, Gray, Carr will move onto better things soon as well after clearly not being in the plans.

 

Braybrooke will be looking at the squad around him and thinking he can do better as well.

 

It's going to be a tough 2-3 seasons 

Heard from a mutual friend that Braybrooke and his family aren’t keen on him sticking around long term anyway

  • Sad 1
Posted

The most frustrating thing about this is we're being picked off because we are where we are and the finances are in a perilous state.

 

If we were in the Prem he may still go but we would likely not have to sell and could hold out for the maximum fee possible. If we were pushing for Europe it's likely he'd stay and he could've become a club stalwart and future legend.

 

It's good that we have this avenue to bail us out of the quagmire we've made for ourselves but it still feels like pure sh!t.

 

Seagrave starting to pay for itself is all well and good, but is it too much to ask to have our own version of the Class of '92 who could propel us back up the leagues and have us challenging for trophies?

 

Another thing that sticks in the craw: Top selling off the family silver to save his arse, avoid future points deductions and the prospect of years in the lower leagues and/or a winding up order just so he can get the price he wants for the club and we can finally get shot of him

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, ALC Fox said:

The most frustrating thing about this is we're being picked off because we are where we are and the finances are in a perilous state.

 

If we were in the Prem he may still go but we would likely not have to sell and could hold out for the maximum fee possible. If we were pushing for Europe it's likely he'd stay and he could've become a club stalwart and future legend.

 

It's good that we have this avenue to bail us out of the quagmire we've made for ourselves but it still feels like pure sh!t.

 

Seagrave starting to pay for itself is all well and good, but is it too much to ask to have our own version of the Class of '92 who could propel us back up the leagues and have us challenging for trophies?

 

Another thing that sticks in the craw: Top selling off the family silver to save his arse, avoid future points deductions and the prospect of years in the lower leagues and/or a winding up order just so he can get the price he wants for the club and we can finally get shot of him

Everything you've said here is spot on. Great post.

But to answer this question..... yes 🤣

  • Haha 1
Posted

Is he too young to be loaned back? Assumed that was the case with Monga which was a shame. 

Posted
34 minutes ago, Brizzle Fox said:

Isn't this the point of having Seagrave though. To develop young talent who cost us nothing and sell for decent money to a club higher up the food chain. 

 

Massively frustrating but surely that's the best way to get ourselves back on a financial even keel, that is sustainable longer term. 

 

Football reality.

The reality will be soon that Seagrave will be a huge white elephant (if not already) built to get and trained the best youth across the Midlands. But now the likes of Forest, Derby and Coventry will be ahead, especially Forest. 

 

A world class facility filled with ok players. 

 

At the rate we're losing the better  youngsters (deregister etc) we not likely to be producing any top youngsters that make it anywhere near the first team before they’re hoovered up and any financial reimbursements we get will be peanuts and not what Seagrave was built for. 
 

I’d imagine category one itself may even be at risk.
 

Seagrave is great but if our philosophy wasn’t then to integrate them and get them a clear path what’s the point. A golden generation used to keep the wolves at the door and then what. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Lesta Legend said:

The reality will be soon that Seagrave will be a huge white elephant (if not already) built to get and trained the best youth across the Midlands. But now the likes of Forest, Derby and Coventry will be ahead, especially Forest. 

 

A world class facility filled with ok players. 

 

At the rate we're losing the better  youngsters (deregister etc) we not likely to be producing any top youngsters that make it anywhere near the first team before they’re hoovered up and any financial reimbursements we get will be peanuts and not what Seagrave was built for. 
 

I’d imagine category one itself may even be at risk.
 

Seagrave is great but if our philosophy wasn’t then to integrate them and get them a clear path what’s the point. A golden generation used to keep the wolves at the door and then what. 

What a huge but 100% deserved embarrassment for the club that would be if it happens.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, honeybradger said:

Maybe not but we would have had a better chance if we had made him feel like a valued member of the squad.

He's a Man U fan and it probably make him for life.

 

1 hour ago, honeybradger said:

The only draw we have over clubs higher in the pyramid is a route to regular first team football but we don't operate that way.

It is but I don't think it makes a difference when Man U come call and you are in league 1.

1 hour ago, honeybradger said:

Forgetting the money and prestige of Man United, Page probably has a better chance of game time by going there and getting a loan than he does by sticking it out here.

Don't be so sure, be interesting how it plays out.

 

Should have played 20 odd more games for us already.

 

Edited by coolhandfox
Posted
52 minutes ago, Brizzle Fox said:

Isn't this the point of having Seagrave though. To develop young talent who cost us nothing and sell for decent money to a club higher up the food chain. 

 

Massively frustrating but surely that's the best way to get ourselves back on a financial even keel, that is sustainable longer term. 

 

Football reality.

Yep and then we can sign 30+ year old players with no re-sale value and hand them 3 year contracts 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, dayday said:

Yep and then we can sign 30+ year old players with no re-sale value and hand them 3 year contracts 

We needed to get some decent leaders in so you’d hope now we seem to have done that a bit we’ll try and recapture the model that made us successful in the first place.. Time for McCarron to really step up now 

Posted
6 minutes ago, dayday said:

Yep and then we can sign 30+ year old players with no re-sale value and hand them 3 year contracts 

Well that's more of a wider issue with the muppets who run our football club unfortunately

Posted
19 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

He's a Man U fan and it probably make him for life.

 

It is but I don't think it makes a difference when Man U come call and you are in league 1.

Don't be so sure, be interesting how it plays out.

 

Should have played 20 odd more games for us already.

 

Should have played 20 more games for us already.

 

Should play 30+ games for us this season.

 

There is a huge gap between what should be happening at the club and what is actually happening at the club at the moment. As it currently stands there's a lot of uncertainty around how much game time he would get with us at the moment.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...