Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, CosbehFox said:

The boardroom battle has been won. 

 

Conclusions will be hasty but personally reckon this is going to be a very big problem for us. 

If she had anything about her, she would have stepped down a while ago. 

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Just now, Sol thewall Bamba said:

All this means is more power for Rudkin and the Nepo baby by the way.

This basically, on the outside good news but if Rudkin doesn’t go next it just means that those two won’t have any more contrary opinions in the club. She was from all the reports the least problematic of the 3 and seems to have been the only one willing to argue back, as incompetent as they have all been

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, LCFCCKEANO said:

 

This basically, on the outside good news but if Rudkin doesn’t go next it just means that those two won’t have any more contrary opinions in the club. She was from all the reports the least problematic of the 3 and seems to have been the only one willing to argue back, as incompetent as they have all been

He won't. He's won.

Posted
1 minute ago, LCFCCKEANO said:

 

This basically, on the outside good news but if Rudkin doesn’t go next it just means that those two won’t have any more contrary opinions in the club. She was from all the reports the least problematic of the 3 and seems to have been the only one willing to argue back, as incompetent as they have all been

Like it's already been said, the boardroom battle has been won by Rudkin. Anyone that thinks this means he'll be gone too is insane.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, VLC86 said:

If she had anything about her, she would have stepped down a while ago. 

Misread your comment. There's an argument you could she didn't give up on it but rather fought until she could give no more. She was certainly more approachable than anyone else at the club - from different angles. 

 

I think she's due a lot of criticism on the commercial side of things but in terms of direct of the footballing side, she understood the concerns more than anyone else. Her standing amongst PL execs was high. She has often stepped in on things to make them happen whereas others wouldn't budge. 

Edited by CosbehFox
  • Like 1
Posted

Can’t wait to see how long we drag out the “replacement process” only to give it to Rudkin

 

Who then hires his own yes man as Director of Football (or probably just promotes Glover)

Posted
1 minute ago, CosbehFox said:

Yes and no. You could also view it as fighting against the current and wanting to change things. She didn't given up but rather fought until she could give no more. 

 

I think she's due a lot of criticism on the commercial side of things but in terms of direct of the footballing side, she understood the concerns more than anyone else. Her standing amongst PL execs was high. She has often stepped in on things to make them happen whereas others wouldn't budge. 

I completely get the first part and knew you would say this, but as soon as it becomes apparent that your voice isn’t getting listened to and things like the sponsorship fiasco creeps in she should have walked, unless it was her that signed it off rather than Top in which case she’s solely to blame for it.

Posted
2 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

The boardroom battle has been won. 

 

Conclusions will be hasty but personally reckon this is going to be a very big problem for us. 

We’ll double down on the individuals who’ll have been the reason we find ourselves where we are now. A likely dissenting voice in a one way positive feedback loop back to Top. A professional club now completely run by amateurs, it will get worse. 
 

Change is needed and she’ll have been irrelevant by the sounds of it but is this just a ploy to make it look to the fans that they’ve changed something at the top. Without further changes this is normal service as it was before. 

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, VLC86 said:

I completely get the first part and knew you would say this, but as soon as it becomes apparent that your voice isn’t getting listened to and things like the sponsorship fiasco creeps in she should have walked, unless it was her that signed it off rather than Top in which case she’s solely to blame for it.

I misread your reply! Agreed but possibly may had a bigger link to parts of the KP family than we have on paper.  

Edited by CosbehFox
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...