Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, Livid said:

Let’s take it, write a line under it and move on.

 

I expected 9.

I'd heard 10. 

 

I was listening to Sky News when she said bad new for Leicester City fans ..... I thought either Ruud or Cooper had been reappointed. 

 

6 pts is fine 

Edited by CrazyKopCorner
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, lcfc_forever said:

PL wanted a 12 point dedication according to Kieran Maguire - and we hoped for a fine so ended up in the middle. Worth reading the whole post, looks like our main defence was as many of us thought that the change to the rulebook was retrospective so shouldn't have applied to financial activity before 2025. 
 

 

Can't really disagree with not wanting to be charged about rules that were implemented a year after the breach 

  • Like 2
Posted

Look we deserve everything we get but the fact the premier league were pushing for 12 considering what everyone else got, just shows how much of this is a vendetta over following rules 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, SemperEadem said:

A new low.

Points deduction could yet be reduced, still, should the club successfully appeal.

Posted
1 hour ago, Katy said:

I cannot emphasise enough how much I hate these incompetent, unserious clowns that are running this club. Shameful, absolutely shameful. 

In fairness, clowns are supposed to be unserious.

Posted

When people say this is a new low, do they think this is worse than administration?

 

 

Anyway onto 6 points, kind of makes it all a waste of fxxking time complying.  We could have bought our way up and soaked up 6 points.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Stevosevic said:

Not really relevant or in anyway linked is it. 
 

The cases aren’t comparable. 

Yeah we can't offer anything like the same quality of bribe

Posted
1 minute ago, Stevosevic said:

Not really relevant or in anyway linked is it. 
 

The cases aren’t comparable. 

No, Man City's is much worse, especially as they've actually gained an advantage from it, unlike us.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Wymsey said:

And Man City's?..

we’ve done just as many dodgy sponsorship deals as them at our comparative level. We’ve just been ****ing dreadful at spending the money received. 
 

Also worth noting our losses reduced last year because of the amount of ****ing advances we took out. Debt now through the roof. 

  • Like 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, Wymsey said:

And Man City's?..

How long are we gonna keep saying this. Not arsed They're a different league both in terms of football and (legal) resources, deal with it. Football is never gonna be any different. 

 

Take accountability for ourselves. 

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...