Fox92 Posted 19 December 2013 Posted 19 December 2013 Just, vile. Babies ffs it's disgusting. Another that should be tortured.
Dr The Singh Posted 19 December 2013 Posted 19 December 2013 Just, vile. Babies ffs it's disgusting. Another that should be tortured. The sword is ready for when he's out!!
AoWW Posted 19 December 2013 Posted 19 December 2013 Usually, if I'm being fiercely judgemental about someone, I like to be fully aware of the facts. Part of me feels I should read the article. The other part of me feels physically sick at just the thought of what it might contain, particularly given the reactions of some on here who no doubt have a stronger stomach than I do.
Trumpet Posted 19 December 2013 Posted 19 December 2013 Firing squad. 2 machine guns. Multiple times to the bollocks. 1 to the head.
Trumpet Posted 19 December 2013 Posted 19 December 2013 Usually, if I'm being fiercely judgemental about someone, I like to be fully aware of the facts. Part of me feels I should read the article. The other part of me feels physically sick at just the thought of what it might contain, particularly given the reactions of some on here who no doubt have a stronger stomach than I do. I almost read it yesterday, before all of the comments on here. Fortunately it wouldn't load. Will steer well clear of it now.
RobHawk Posted 19 December 2013 Posted 19 December 2013 Read it last night in bed, was really lost for words so didn't comment. Haunted me all night though and had an awful nights sleep. Wouldn't advise reading it just before bed. Also agree that the 2 woman are worse than he is! It sickened me that not only were they offering up their children but also they were doing the majority of the abuse while he was getting off on it. Can't understand how any parent could even contemplate such a thing!
Captain... Posted 19 December 2013 Posted 19 December 2013 Usually, if I'm being fiercely judgemental about someone, I like to be fully aware of the facts. Part of me feels I should read the article. The other part of me feels physically sick at just the thought of what it might contain, particularly given the reactions of some on here who no doubt have a stronger stomach than I do. Basically it is a lot worse than what you probably already know from the previous reports, if you found them hard to read then you probably shouldn't read the full details. It is probably the most distressing thing I've ever read.
cambridgefox Posted 19 December 2013 Posted 19 December 2013 Knew I had a couple of CDs by Lostprophets and whilst looking for Dr Dre " the chronic" (hell of an album )found the other two CDs and snapped them ,and then binned. Reading that brought back some memories of a horrific jury duty I once attended,not as bad,but you get the picture,I'm not expanding on it I'm afraid.one as I don't want to and two not sure if you are allowed to.
StanSP Posted 19 December 2013 Posted 19 December 2013 Firing squad. 2 machine guns. Multiple times to the bollocks. 1 to the head. Sorry, meant 1 aimed at each and multiple times to each!
FoxesAreBlue Posted 19 December 2013 Posted 19 December 2013 Let me out it this way... My gaffer is very much a mans man, always up for a laugh, and often has a very dark sense of humor in and around the office at work. He also has two young daughters aged 4 and 7. He initially tole me about this case and I found out a little bit more via this very thread. Last night I read that link... and today I told him that what I had read was so bad that I simply couldn't repeat it to him, what I simply couldn't do was describe what has happened. All up could say was that I simply cannot fathom how one human can even consider committing the barbaric atrocities that this guy has, let alone the mothers of these two poor, poor babies. It kept me awake last night and no doubt will tonight, there aren't any atrocities in this world but I can say with absolute honesty that I have never been so offended by anything else in my life. God help these two poor babies.
Tielemans63 Posted 19 December 2013 Posted 19 December 2013 Usually, if I'm being fiercely judgemental about someone, I like to be fully aware of the facts. Part of me feels I should read the article. The other part of me feels physically sick at just the thought of what it might contain, particularly given the reactions of some on here who no doubt have a stronger stomach than I do. Don't read it AOWW - it's comfortably the most disturbing thing I've ever read.
Corky Posted 19 December 2013 Posted 19 December 2013 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-25447856 Unbelievably careless from those who printed the article and added the photo.
MC Prussian Posted 19 December 2013 Posted 19 December 2013 Usually, if I'm being fiercely judgemental about someone, I like to be fully aware of the facts. Part of me feels I should read the article. The other part of me feels physically sick at just the thought of what it might contain, particularly given the reactions of some on here who no doubt have a stronger stomach than I do. His cruel acts and the willful assistance by the two complacent and heartless women are nearly indescribable. I mean, I know there are perverts out there - but never before have I heard of so-called "grown-up" men with such delusions of arrogance, such a massive ego problem and such god-like fantasies fondling with toddlers. It's sexual abuse of the bizarre and very twisted kind.
PAULCFC Posted 21 December 2013 Posted 21 December 2013 Just read the court notes and as a father of 2 under 3's.....i hope he suffers and suffers and suffers....then dies a slow death.Probably got his slippers on in a nice warm cell though. :xmasangry:
stripeyfox Posted 21 December 2013 Posted 21 December 2013 Dont read if easy offended. http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/r-v-watkins-and-others.pdf Dear God, I wish I hadn't read that. It defies all natural human behaviour. There can be no defence of that kind of depraved behaviour from any of them. I don't understand what gratification can be gained from that sort of abuse
Jon the Hat Posted 21 December 2013 Posted 21 December 2013 Dear God, I wish I hadn't read that. It defies all natural human behaviour. There can be no defence of that kind of depraved behaviour from any of them. I don't understand what gratification can be gained from that sort of abuse it's about power I guess. Abuse usually is.
Guest Bilo Posted 28 December 2013 Posted 28 December 2013 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RleE--HDBiU
Captain... Posted 28 December 2013 Posted 28 December 2013 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RleE--HDBiU Wow, that was just brilliant and so wrong at the same time, I do love KATG.
davieG Posted 5 January 2015 Posted 5 January 2015 Joanne Mjadzelics shared child abuse images with Ian Watkins Joanne Mjadzelics pleaded not guilty to the offences Continue reading the main story Related StoriesWoman denies child image charges A woman has gone on trial accused of encouraging rock singer Ian Watkins to distribute indecent images of children. Joanne Mjadzelics, 39, from Doncaster, is accused of possessing and distributing indecent images. She claimed she encouraged the Lostprophets singer - serving 35 years for child sex offences - to send the images in order to expose his criminality, Cardiff Crown Court heard. She denies seven charges in relation to images. Ms Mjadzelics was arrested following Watkins' guilty pleas in November 2013. Sex tape The jury heard excerpts from a sex tape from 2008 where Watkins and Ms Mjadzelics, who had a relationship, discussed their desire to abuse very young children together. The video was entitled "Jo paedo talk Cardiff" and prosecutor Jim Davies told the jury the pair discussed their desire to abuse children. They also heard Ms Mjadzelics had said in the video she wanted to kidnap and rape children. The prosecution then read out parts of an online conversation in 2011 where Watkins posted indecent images of child abuse, and Ms Mjadzelics' explicit responses. During the conversation, she said: "I want everything we ever talked about," the court heard. In a later online exchange, Ms Mjadzelics asked: "Can I please have some pics Daddy?" and asked for pictures of child sex abuse to be sent to her. The jury heard the defendant admitted having indecent images in her possession but claimed she had a legitimate reason for having them as she was trying to bring Watkins to justice. She denies four counts of possessing and two of distributing indecent images of children and one count of encouraging and assisting the distribution of an indecent image of a child. The trial continues.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.