bovril Posted 1 October 2014 Share Posted 1 October 2014 I've read your posts a couple of times and they still don't make any sense to me. You're not alone, Webbo. You obviously all need a 2:1 in Sociology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellend Sebastian Posted 1 October 2014 Share Posted 1 October 2014 My mate Mark routinely eats a whole big bag of satsumas for his lunch, and if that's not extreme I don't know what is. It's good to hear that the authorities are finally bringing clowns like this to book Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitalalba Posted 1 October 2014 Share Posted 1 October 2014 So 50 years ago they introduced a policy that would make people protest about things so that they could introduce a law to stop people protesting 50 years later? Doesn't seem that likely to me. Nigel Pearson thinks about 2 years ahead, what his team could be like, where he will be, with city or other, and he's just a football manager. If you were in the position of ruler, lets say for arguments sake, the ruler of the world, and there were elections whereby you could be voted out. Being ruler of the world would give such a fantastic lifestyle, the joy you would have would be imense, but what if those crummy sheep could write an 'X' on a pice of paper enough times and you lose your position, nightmare. Would you use your position to keep your position? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 1 October 2014 Share Posted 1 October 2014 Nigel Pearson thinks about 2 years ahead, what his team could be like, where he will be, with city or other, and he's just a football manager. If you were in the position of ruler, lets say for arguments sake, the ruler of the world, and there were elections whereby you could be voted out. Being ruler of the world would give such a fantastic lifestyle, the joy you would have would be imense, but what if those crummy sheep could write an 'X' on a pice of paper enough times and you lose your position, nightmare. Would you use your position to keep your position? No, sorry, it's still bollox to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitalalba Posted 1 October 2014 Share Posted 1 October 2014 No, sorry, it's still bollox to me. That doesn't surprise me, and you're not alone. It's mega hard to convince someone, off the top of my head, I have a small example of the kind of nightmare that the elite can get away with. A few years ago, and you can see reports in many papers, one of the worlds 'leading banks', HSBC, were caught laundering money in Mexico, buying and selling drugs, and 'earned' $5.2 Billion, approximately 60,000 people lost their lives, some beheaded, not as a direct result of HSBC. They were fined $1 Billion. Now, haha do I need go any further...when the elite can get away with these things, and i hear max Keiser describe many, MANY more things like it, you start to get a picture of the power these people have. They think nothing of using our taxes to persuade good men and women to RISK THEIR LIVES illegaly invading foreign lands to fight a 'bogeyman' al'qeada, isis, whoever. It is basic comon sense, that if you don't bomb those muslims, they won't want to fight us because quite simply, they haven't the firepower, but if you provoke them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 1 October 2014 Share Posted 1 October 2014 That doesn't surprise me, and you're not alone. It's mega hard to convince someone, off the top of my head, I have a small example of the kind of nightmare that the elite can get away with. A few years ago, and you can see reports in many papers, one of the worlds 'leading banks', HSBC, were caught laundering money in Mexico, buying and selling drugs, and 'earned' $5.2 Billion, approximately 60,000 people lost their lives, some beheaded, not as a direct result of HSBC. They were fined $1 Billion. Now, haha do I need go any further...when the elite can get away with these things, and i hear max Keiser describe many, MANY more things like it, you start to get a picture of the power these people have. They think nothing of using our taxes to persuade good men and women to RISK THEIR LIVES illegaly invading foreign lands to fight a 'bogeyman' al'qeada, isis, whoever. It is basic comon sense, that if you don't bomb those muslims, they won't want to fight us because quite simply, they haven't the firepower, but if you provoke them... If they were caught and fined $1 billion they didn't get away with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bettsj2 Posted 1 October 2014 Share Posted 1 October 2014 That doesn't surprise me, and you're not alone. It's mega hard to convince someone, off the top of my head, I have a small example of the kind of nightmare that the elite can get away with. A few years ago, and you can see reports in many papers, one of the worlds 'leading banks', HSBC, were caught laundering money in Mexico, buying and selling drugs, and 'earned' $5.2 Billion, approximately 60,000 people lost their lives, some beheaded, not as a direct result of HSBC. They were fined $1 Billion. Now, haha do I need go any further...when the elite can get away with these things, and i hear max Keiser describe many, MANY more things like it, you start to get a picture of the power these people have. They think nothing of using our taxes to persuade good men and women to RISK THEIR LIVES illegaly invading foreign lands to fight a 'bogeyman' al'qeada, isis, whoever. It is basic comon sense, that if you don't bomb those muslims, they won't want to fight us because quite simply, they haven't the firepower, but if you provoke them... 2 words that solve all this. Chebs thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitalalba Posted 1 October 2014 Share Posted 1 October 2014 If they were caught and fined $1 billion they didn't get away with it. The fact that they made a profit of $4.2 Billion, and they admitted that they made a profit, doesn't strike you as odd, sorry, mentally insane. Does it strike you as odd that they didn't receive a ticking off for being partly responsible for the lives of 60,000 people, and/or, didn't lose their 'licence' to exist serving the general public as a bank? Please excuse me, I often use basic logic to explain myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DennisNedry Posted 1 October 2014 Share Posted 1 October 2014 I thought it was fairly common knowledge that Blair set about trying to import as many immigrants (useful and useless) as he could to try and boost the Labour vote? Or is that a rumour that is actually BS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brizzle Fox Posted 1 October 2014 Share Posted 1 October 2014 Might be going out on a limb here but I'm thinking that Digital alba might be a bit of a racist. .....might be wrong though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MattP Posted 1 October 2014 Share Posted 1 October 2014 I thought it was fairly common knowledge that Blair set about trying to import as many immigrants (useful and useless) as he could to try and boost the Labour vote? Or is that a rumour that is actually BS? Been admitted and apologised for by numerous people in the Labour party. There is no doubt a certain political party has sought out immigrant communities to boost their vote here, they know they can't rely on the working class for their vote anymore so they set about creating an immigrant and underclass that would cover it and never once seemed to consider the consequences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitalalba Posted 1 October 2014 Share Posted 1 October 2014 Not only that Matt, they deliberate organised for some of their activists to literally go to other countries seeking people to come here. Of course, when they arrive, they settle and realise that the anti-British Labour party is their party, a party for foreigners like them. What will happen to the Labour party when it has an equal mix of British and foreigners, how will they reach decisions to set about their policies. British man, jobs for Brits. Foreigner, no, jobs for foreigners. Brit man, this is England. Foreigner, so, this is Labour, we're anti-British. Brit man, eh? You heard. I'm off to vote British. Bye. = Labour party dies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.Lisemore Posted 1 October 2014 Share Posted 1 October 2014 Religion is just bollocks. Such a shame so many people take it so seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DennisNedry Posted 1 October 2014 Share Posted 1 October 2014 If you are brought up by devout parents in a devout community, very few people can escape the idealology and think logically afterwards. I guess it's similar to how children born in 1930s Germany believed wholeheartedly in Nazism without questioning it and struggled to adapt to life after it's fall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle_Le_Don Posted 1 October 2014 Share Posted 1 October 2014 http://socialistworker.org/2002-2/431/431_08_Racism.shtml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAPA LAZAROU Posted 2 October 2014 Share Posted 2 October 2014 http://socialistworker.org/2002-2/431/431_08_Racism.shtml What complete and utter b*llocks. According to this socialist rag racism began with the big bad White man and the slave trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 2 October 2014 Share Posted 2 October 2014 http://socialistworker.org/2002-2/431/431_08_Racism.shtml And yet Russian, after 70 years of Marxism is a far more racist place than any country in the capitalist west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl the Llama Posted 2 October 2014 Share Posted 2 October 2014 Try and integrate people with this kind of Islamic mentality. Good luck. Can't stand TYT. Don't think I've ever heard an authentic Turkish accent on any of their bulletins - they're just a bunch of children of the country's emigrant elite sat in America acting outraged and hi-fiving eachother over how ethnically tolerant they are in their ivory tower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitalalba Posted 2 October 2014 Share Posted 2 October 2014 white slavery.jpg What complete and utter b*llocks. According to this socialist rag racism began with the big bad White man and the slave trade. One wonders what inspires the teachers of history to lie, deceive and cheat the people they are trying to get on their side? Why are they scared of people knowing the truth, what have they got to hide? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rincewind Posted 2 October 2014 Share Posted 2 October 2014 One wonders what inspires the teachers of history to lie, deceive and cheat the people they are trying to get on their side? Why are they scared of people knowing the truth, what have they got to hide? They learn their trade from politicians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smudge Posted 2 October 2014 Share Posted 2 October 2014 Can't stand TYT. Don't think I've ever heard an authentic Turkish accent on any of their bulletins - they're just a bunch of children of the country's emigrant elite sat in America acting outraged and hi-fiving eachother over how ethnically tolerant they are in their ivory tower.Young Turks means rebellious.http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Turks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieG Posted 2 October 2014 Author Share Posted 2 October 2014 I'd have thought this was being ironic or at least a parody? The controversial Banksy image, which has now been removed. Comments (5)A Banksy mural which depicted a group of pigeons holding up banners has been removed from a wall in Clacton after complaints that it was racist. The painting was scrubbed off by Tendring District Council officials after the complaint was received on Tuesday, our sister paper the Essex Chronicle has reported. The birds were shown holding banners which read 'Go Back to Africa' and 'Migrants not Welcome'. The artist is known for making provocative political statements through his work. Do you think the image is racist? Leave your comments below. Read more: http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Banksy-artwork-scrubbed-wall-racist/story-23034421-detail/story.html#comments#ixzz3F0BkEsv3 Follow us: @Leicester_Merc on Twitter | leicestermercury on FacebookRead more at http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Banksy-artwork-scrubbed-wall-racist/story-23034421-detail/story.html#ZkoYmfpOUmwJGSsg.99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MattP Posted 2 October 2014 Share Posted 2 October 2014 http://socialistworker.org/2002-2/431/431_08_Racism.shtml I didn't even know that rag was still going, is there any problem they can't blame on capitalism? I'd have thought this was being ironic or at least a parody? The controversial Banksy image, which has now been removed. Comments (5)A Banksy mural which depicted a group of pigeons holding up banners has been removed from a wall in Clacton after complaints that it was racist. The painting was scrubbed off by Tendring District Council officials after the complaint was received on Tuesday, our sister paper the Essex Chronicle has reported. The birds were shown holding banners which read 'Go Back to Africa' and 'Migrants not Welcome'. The artist is known for making provocative political statements through his work. Controversial and a ill-informed no doubt but I'm not sure it should be removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James. Posted 2 October 2014 Share Posted 2 October 2014 I didn't even know that rag was still going, is there any problem they can't blame on capitalism? Controversial and a ill-informed no doubt but I'm not sure it should be removed. Not sure? It's absolutely ludicrous it was removed. I posted this in the gear grinding thread. For some reason this above everything else recently has wound me up the most Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitalalba Posted 2 October 2014 Share Posted 2 October 2014 The birds were shown holding banners which read 'Go Back to Africa' and 'Migrants not Welcome'. The artist is known for making provocative political statements through his work. The birds were shown holding banners which read 'Move out the way white people, Africans are here as well' and 'Migrants more Welcome than Brits'. Multicultural politicians are known for making provocative political statements through their work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.