Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
promised land

Vardy & LCFC Charged by the FA - Charges Accepted & Personal Hearing Requested

By promised land, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Babylon

Babylon

Posted
Posted

Can't believe how the long the process for deciding this has taken.

They are only deciding on the relative vulgarity of a phrase that comprises TWO WORDS

We asked for a hearing, you'd have known straight away had we not. Costa took about 3 weeks to sort.

ScouseFox

ScouseFox

Posted
Posted

remarkable that it's going to take over a week to decide what to do. what are they deciding? what are they even doing? it should've been decided last sunday night ffs. 

 

what if he was an arsenal or city or everton etc player who, since the incident, have already played two games? would they have been forced to make a decision quicker? would he have been banned for a game, then back in at the weekend and still be possibly banned again in the future? 

Guest BlueBrett

Guest BlueBrett

Posted
Posted

Given that everyone seems to be assuming a one match ban is inevitable, I'm concerned that the personal hearing may have been requested because Jamie and the club think there's a genuine possibility it could be 2. The thing about the Costa situation is, the likelihood is that the bulk of his profanity would have been in Spanish and therefore less jarring to the ref's ear. Vardy getting right in his face and calling him a **** may well have caused much more offense and it's just far more blatant. Hope I'm wrong.

mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted

Interesting it is taking so long. If another ban surely they just say so now - why FFS drag it out into tomorrow? So may be a fine only and they do not want to effect Spuds morale before tonight's game as they will kick-off big time if Vardy is not sentenced to be hung.

iLikeFoxes

iLikeFoxes

Posted
Posted

02_18170904_4fc21f_2807304a.jpg

I've always thought it was no dive. It was sticking a branch into the spokes of your brothers bicycle; Vardy was going down and I saw it for a penalty.

Great pic!

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Ricey

Ricey

Posted
Posted

What is? I can't see anything!!

 

Assuming it was a tweet from a fake journalist who 'works' for a fake website called Forest Echo News.

Matt

Matt

Posted
Posted

I really do have a sneaky suspicion he might be getting away with just a fine, it's very frustrating it's dragging on yet another day though, why?

 

For me, it's deliberation, in a way almost an admission Moss was shite so should they be abit more lenient, asking questions of themself and the referee in question. Do they have the bollocks to do that though?!

 

Either way just get it over and done with one way or the other FFS.

americanfox

americanfox

Posted
Posted

For me, it's deliberation, in a way almost an admission Moss was shite so should they be abit more lenient, asking questions of themself and the referee in question.

 

It's a lose-lose. Stick with precedent, and we are unfairly punished for Moss's abominable performance (and he wasn't assigned a match this week, so that implicitly says something, does it?). Let him go, and it cries of foul play to the media and Spurs fans.

melrose

melrose

Posted
Posted

I've always thought it was no dive. It was sticking a branch into the spokes of your brothers bicycle; Vardy was going down and I saw it for a penalty.

Great pic!

Trouble is it was Vardy that stuck the branch into the spokes!

 

He's done it a few times and got away with it!

 

The lad knew what he was doing!

 

Matt

Matt

Posted
Posted

It's a lose-lose. Stick with precedent, and we are unfairly punished for Moss's abominable performance (and he wasn't assigned a match this week, so that implicitly says something, does it?). Let him go, and it cries of foul play to the media and Spurs fans.

 

So a fine is some middle ground I suppose.

 

Ok in terms of punishing LCFC as a team/club it means fuck all, but at the end of the day it's nothing to do with the team/club, it's to do with Jamie Vardy.

(Besides they've already charged the club for failing to control the players of which i'm assuming is a fine for the club?)

 

Media and Spurs probably won't see a fine as a 'fair' outcome but it's still punishing Vardy whilst being lenient after an awful refereeing performance.

st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted

forest echo news is a spoof account.

 

I got caught out on the doping thing a few weeks ago


It's a lose-lose. Stick with precedent, and we are unfairly punished for Moss's abominable performance (and he wasn't assigned a match this week, so that implicitly says something, does it?). Let him go, and it cries of foul play to the media and Spurs fans.

 

he wasn't assigned a match cos he reffed Thursday night at the emirates

foxfanazer

foxfanazer

Posted
Posted

I really do have a sneaky suspicion he might be getting away with just a fine, it's very frustrating it's dragging on yet another day though, why?

For me, it's deliberation, in a way almost an admission Moss was shite so should they be abit more lenient, asking questions of themself and the referee in question. Do they have the bollocks to do that though?!

Either way just get it over and done with one way or the other FFS.

Is it definitely not being announced today?
americanfox

americanfox

Posted
Posted

he wasn't assigned a match cos he reffed Thursday night at the emirates

 

 

Moss was the 4th official at the FA cup semi-final match Man Utd v Everton this week-end.

 

I meant next week, sorry. Didn't see him name on the list, while we get Michael Oliver.

jammie82uk

jammie82uk

Posted
Posted

Is it definitely not being announced today?

Sky sports reporter outside wembley said they was hopeful for tonight but expect it to be tomorrow morning

SpinneyHillRanger

SpinneyHillRanger

Posted
Posted

vardy must have been told the verdict at the hearing. The procedure is the deliberate after the evidence has been presented and then they call you back in and give their verdict.

 

under some circumstances they give it in writing at a later date but don't think this is one of those type of cases.

 

Vardy should already know. Hopefully it will just be a massive fine, two game ban seems excessive for a couple of swear words,  a non-yellow card and a foul on him in the penalty area.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...