Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Sly

Next Permanent Leicester Manager Odds

Recommended Posts

Posted
30 minutes ago, lcfceaves said:

 

No more grim than Pearson yet everyone keeps banging on about him! He might at least make us solid and less easy to beat. 

Id rather have O'Neill... I'm not really sure why other than nostalgia though which could be dangerous 

:blink: Played better football under Pearson than we ever have under Ranieri

Posted
1 hour ago, Johnthefoxrayner said:

Brenden Rogers from  Celtic 

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Posted
1 hour ago, Matt said:

Bit disrepectful ain't it @Donut?

 

We already have a manager!

 

(Incase anyone doesn't know i'm being sarcastic as Donut pulled me up for putting the same link up only 3 maybe 4 days ago).

 

How's that sand Donut?!

Id prefer we leave the next manager discussions till we need a new manager.

 

To 99% of foxestalk we needed a new manager weeks ago.

 

I still the issues are deeper and ranieri is a good manager and im happy to be quoted on it.

Posted

MON for me. Someone with a bit of passion behind them. I still wouldn't mind 'arry either, the majority would say no on here, but then again you all tend to say no to anyone unless they're an unknown from some Mongolian forest....but he knows the prem, doesn't take any shit and might get us playing a bit of footie. 

Posted

People suggesting Michael O Neill need heads checking 

 

its shit thinking like that got us some right duff wankers in the period from Taylor to Pearson 

 

Get a world class coach in 

Posted
9 hours ago, Sly said:

I'm surprised Sousa wasn't in the list.

I mentioned this to someone the other day.  I believe the owners still talk to Paulo or they did

Posted

I'd take Rowett. Definitely. MON or Pearson would be good, but probably not going to happen, and probably wouldn't be the same as before.

 

I'd be absolutely gutted if we ended up with someone like Hodgson.

 

This is all academic anyway. Ranieri is seemingly untouchable, no matter how badly he fvcks us up.

Posted

The more I think about it the more I like the O'Neill idea (Martin that is)

 

He will fire rockets up arses

He can come on board until end of the season until we find a longer term replacement

He will lift the atmosphere in the stadium in the short term and in the dressing room

 

Just get him in.

Posted
9 hours ago, BenTheFox said:

Sean Dyche would be my first choice, but he won't leave Burnley for us at the minute. 

 ol ginger bollocks gravel mouth can do one 

Posted
2 hours ago, GaelicFox said:

 

Get a world class coach in 

Agree entirely but we'll need quality coaching foot-soldiers too. It shouldn't be about badges but about ability. I've personally seen how easily badges are distributed - often to hopeless performers/demonstrators it in for extra earning potential    

Posted
9 hours ago, dmayne7 said:

:blink: Played better football under Pearson than we ever have under Ranieri

Cmon I mean that's just simply not true. I can completely understand people wanting Ranieri gone based on how we look at the moment but there's just so much wrong with that statement I don't know where to begin, but I'll give it a go.

 

1) we played some horrible football under Pearson at times. I get it that he was a great manager for us and transformed the club top to bottom but it wasn't all "sexy football" his achievements though put him in top 3 managers we have ever had IMO

 

2) we played some of the best football we have ever played last season, you know when we won the prem with Ranieri

 

3) it's just simply not true to say we played better football under Pearson than we EVER have under Ranieri.

 

You could have said we are playing worse football now than we ever did under Pearson and that would probably be right.

 

But with the statement you made. That's not just having a short term memory it's Goldfishesque. Think even Pearson would respond by asking if you were a Goldfish?

 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, lcfceaves said:

Short memories 

Not at all. We're were ruthlessly efficient last year (more so than under Pearson) but if you're talking in terms of pace, possession, quality of buildup etc. Pearson's team was better

Posted
11 minutes ago, stingray said:

 ol ginger bollocks gravel mouth can do one 

Exactly. Replace one manager than just lost to a league one club with another that just lost to a non league club.....

Posted
3 minutes ago, josh_baskin said:

I seriously can't see the harm in letting shakey and stowell be joint coaches till the end of the season 

 

Next decent job Pearson gets, they'll be gone!

Posted
17 minutes ago, stingray said:

 ol ginger bollocks gravel mouth can do one 

I'm willing to forgive any of his snide little comments in the past. I think he'd get the players working as a unit again and would be a long term appointment.

Posted
4 minutes ago, desertfox2 said:

Cmon I mean that's just simply not true. I can completely understand people wanting Ranieri gone based on how we look at the moment but there's just so much wrong with that statement I don't know where to begin, but I'll give it a go.

 

1) we played some horrible football under Pearson at times. I get it that he was a great manager for us and transformed the club top to bottom but it wasn't all "sexy football" his achievements though put him in top 3 managers we have ever had IMO

 

2) we played some of the best football we have ever played last season, you know when we won the prem with Ranieri

 

3) it's just simply not true to say we played better football under Pearson than we EVER have under Ranieri.

 

You could have said we are playing worse football now than we ever did under Pearson and that would probably be right.

 

But with the statement you made. That's not just having a short term memory it's Goldfishesque. Think even Pearson would respond by asking if you were a Goldfish?

 

 

Yes, because I said we always played great football under him. Don't worry, I remember some of the filth we threw up (that awful run into the playoffs).

 

This was a response in relation to the attractiveness of Pearson's football which on the whole, was much better than Ranieri's. When I say ever, I obviously mean over a period of time, not just one game. See, my above post. Last year was about efficiency and tactics. We played some good stuff at the start of the year but we were really grinding it out after that living on the momentum. I can't exactly think of many great team goals last year (plenty of good individual ones). With inferior players, Pearson's team could actually pass in triangles and out from the back.

 

We've been playing this for 35 games this year, a large portion of Ranieri's time here.

 

Look, we wouldn't have won last year with Pearson. Ranieri gave us something tactically, Pearson couldn't. But, unlike you, I really am not suffering from any kind of memory loss. I remember that Claudio did wonders last year. I also remember then we started looking very sratchy at the end of last season, we were awful in pre-season and that when Pearson left, we had turned into a good Premier League team, playing decent stuff.

 

You want to forget that, that's up to you but don't question my memory when I'm actually being impartial about it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...