Lionheart10 Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 Not sure why a Fenchman is allowed to take a penalty for us,they should be banned following Kermogant and Knockearts!
BoyJones Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 4 minutes ago, potter3 said: No they do not. From the Laws of the Game: I thought Law 13 referred to free kicks, not penalty kicks. Law 14 relates to penalty kicks.
the fox Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 5 minutes ago, Merging Cultures said: I deleted the extra spaces, changed missed to ineligible and highlighted the key words. Perhaps it's easier to understand now? Come off your high horse, no need to talk down to others. I ain't begging for your reply so, a level headed response would be much appreciated.
Merging Cultures Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 3 minutes ago, the fox said: Come off your high horse, no need to talk down to others. I ain't begging for your reply so, a level headed response would be much appreciated. Lol. But sore? Look, I posted a pretty detailed post, which included comments on their players in the box, you chose to ignore it, so come on, if you can't be bothered to read a post before commenting on it, then expect to have someone be a bit sarcastic back.
foxes_rule1978 Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 35 minutes ago, ealingfox said: No it wasn't. The left leg brings him down in the box so you are right
yorkie1999 Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 7 minutes ago, matty98 said: People moaning about encroachment need to get over it, every team does it, including us. Madley made the right decision. Not in the case of a disallowed penalty. When, if ever, was the last time a peno got disallowed for touching the ball twice after slipping over when there were 2 opposition players in the box. The ball went in the goal and It should have been re-taken because a law was broken when the penalty was taken, the officials don't know the rules for the organisation they work for.
katieakita Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 As posted we will not change things but bottom line is the keeper was off the line before Mahrez hit the ball twice as were the 2 players encroaching so laws of the game dictate a retake of the kick. On a positive though it will miff Arsenal and we showed missing some key players we can still take on the big boys. Also we can all agree both Pep and Bobby M are both bellends
jammie82uk Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 11 minutes ago, BoyJones said: I thought Law 13 referred to free kicks, not penalty kicks. Law 14 relates to penalty kicks. The quote is from law 14 it's the positioning of the freekick you have to refer to law 13 for
the fox Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 2 minutes ago, Merging Cultures said: Lol. But sore? Look, I posted a pretty detailed post, which included comments on their players in the box, you chose to ignore it, so come on, if you can't be bothered to read a post before commenting on it, then expect to have someone be a bit sarcastic back. I did, my point is, the two players were inside the box before riyad took the pen, so, it should've been a retake. You could be right about it not being a retake, but that's just my opinion, maybe if he missed, I would've agreed with you. But, he scored.
Mark 'expert' Lawrenson Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 12 minutes ago, Lionheart10 said: Not sure why a Fenchman is allowed to take a penalty for us,they should be banned following Kermogant and Knockearts! What is this?
st albans fox Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 Following on from the same thing happening with griezemann earlier in the week, I suspect we may see a change in the rules on this if the ball goes in. If it's misses then it's sheer bad luck. the attacking side should not suffer a reversal of the decision in this way. It's simply unjust.
Kitchandro Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 Don't know why there's a debate, Mahrez cocked up another penalty, that's it.
Mickyblueeyes Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 You can't blame Mahrez for slipping. That's ridiculous. However, had he not slipped, I think he would've missed ? Hard luck story Story for us today. Let's smash them next year with a creativity right winger and a number ten who offers a bit more. Not far, these lot.
potter3 Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 5 minutes ago, Kitchandro said: Don't know why there's a debate, Mahrez cocked up another penalty, that's it. Yeah man, can't believe how many he's missed this season
potter3 Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 22 minutes ago, BoyJones said: I thought Law 13 referred to free kicks, not penalty kicks. Law 14 relates to penalty kicks. Yeah? That's exactly why I quoted part of rule 14.
chapero82 Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 So what about the 3 players in the box at the time of Mahrez kicking it in the first place?
Dan Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 It's the right decision but I do think it's quite a harsh rule in this case. I definitely think there's a case for it changing it to a retake when that happens rather than a free kick.
Redouane Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 11 minutes ago, potter3 said: Yeah man, can't believe how many he's missed this season Yeah how dare he miss 1 penalty out of 6.
VLC86 Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 Can we just all agree to laugh at the pen instead? Only one of ours could do that.
Redouane Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 1 minute ago, Costock_Fox said: Can we just all agree to laugh at the pen instead? Only one of ours could do that. Actually same thing happened to Griezmann in the UCL semis
BoyJones Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 5 minutes ago, potter3 said: Yeah? That's exactly why I quoted part of rule 14. Ok mate, just have to agree to differ. If the kicker infringes the rules and the ball goes into the net, the referee is within his rights to order retake, according to Law 14. Later on it does go into detail about a second touch by the kicker, but this surely relates to a deliberate knocking the ball a couple of yards nearer goal then blasting it. And no outside agent involved. The law was never about slipping and having a virtual simultaneous and accidental touch. Anyway, as already stated Mahrez did mess up and the game is over.
potter3 Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 4 minutes ago, Redouane said: Yeah how dare he miss 1 penalty out of 6. (sarcasm)
Thracian Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 Decision looks okay to me however the referee arrived at it. Two of the points of debate are marginal either way. Bottom line is we cocked up the penalty.
Manwell Pablo Posted 13 May 2017 Posted 13 May 2017 Really, we having a go at a ref for making a correct decision because he might have not been looking directly at the incident pretty sure the encroachment rule doesn't count in the case of a double contact as well but come on . The only thing that was comical was the penalty taker himself if you want get your knickers in a twist about something I'd have a look their first goal which should not have stood.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.