foxes21 Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 https://streamable.com/ctyyy - replay of the penalty. Watch Bob Madley when Riyad strikes the ball. Madley is looking towards the goalkeeper when he strikes it, so how could he see the two touches. Bob Madley is influenced by the Man City players reaction, he didn't even see the two touches by Riyad. Also, you can clearly see two Man City players in the box before Riyad strikes the ball, so it should have been a re-take anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry - LCFC Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 The foul was outside the box so we can't complain about the penalty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ealingfox Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 Just now, Harry - LCFC said: The foul was outside the box so we can't complain about the penalty No it wasn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st albans fox Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 Just now, Harry - LCFC said: The foul was outside the box so we can't complain about the penalty That was marginal - think contact was on the line why is he watching the keeper ?? That's the lino's job. Or the lino should be asked to check for encroachment- no way should a pen entering the goal result in an indirect free kick for the defending team unless the officials are certain no other misdemeanours have taken place - and they did re the encroachment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koke Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 It was the correct decidion by Madley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
potter3 Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 It's the right decision, never mind the fact that he's looking right at him as he takes the kick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARM1968 Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 No it wasnt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARM1968 Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 Well, only if you've got Pep's chorizo trapped between your lips. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxes21 Posted 13 May 2017 Author Share Posted 13 May 2017 1 minute ago, potter3 said: It's the right decision, never mind the fact that he's looking right at him as he takes the kick. No he isn't, he's looking at the goalkeeper when Mahrez strikes with the ball. He couldn't have seen the two touches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merging Cultures Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 Contact on the line/inside the box = peno Mahrez had two touches = missed peno Players inside the box = retake? Goalie off the line = retake? Was one of our players in the box? Not sure what that means. Either way, I think probably a retake would have been best, but the fact that it was two touches means it was missed either way. Edit: And the reason the game is so much fun is the human element, the mistakes, the errors, the opinions, and the BS. No decision should be perfect, or the game becomes dull. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxinsocks Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 It was a pen... it wasn't a goal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
potter3 Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 3 minutes ago, foxes21 said: No he isn't, he's looking at the goalkeeper when Mahrez strikes with the ball. He couldn't have seen the two touches. Mahrez strikes the ball (twice), Madley is looking right at him: The ball goes into the goal, Madley turns his head to watch: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the fox Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 3 minutes ago, Merging Cultures said: Contact on the line/inside the box = peno Mahrez had two touches = missed peno Players inside the box = retake? Goalie off the line = retake? Was one of our players in the box? Not sure what that means. Either way, I think probably a retake would have been best, but the fact that it was two touches means it was missed either way. Edit: And the reason the game is so much fun is the human element, the mistakes, the errors, the opinions, and the BS. No decision should be perfect, or the game becomes dull. The problem is, riyad scored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merging Cultures Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 2 minutes ago, the fox said: The problem is, riyad scored. With two touches. Not that difficult to understand! Perhaps 'ineligible' works better for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the fox Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 Just now, Merging Cultures said: With two touches. Not that difficult to understand! What about the 2 players in the box? And who said that he wouldn't score if it was 1 touch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxy boxing Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 Surely the penalty should have been retaken! But Riyad should have just blasted it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merging Cultures Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 Just now, the fox said: What about the 2 players in the box? And who said that he wouldn't score if it was 1 touch. Perhaps my post was too long for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ Barry Hammond Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 http://www.thefa.com/-/media/files/thefaportal/governance-docs/laws-of-the-game/law-14---the-penalty-kick.ashx might come in useful (not worded very well mind!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyJones Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 The rules state a retake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merging Cultures Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 10 minutes ago, Merging Cultures said: Contact on the line/inside the box = peno Mahrez had two touches = INELIGIBLE peno Players inside the box = retake? Goalie off the line = retake? Was one of our players in the box? Not sure what that means. Either way, I think probably a retake would have been best, but the fact that it was two touches means it was INELIGIBLE either way. Edit: And the reason the game is so much fun is the human element, the mistakes, the errors, the opinions, and the BS. No decision should be perfect, or the game becomes dull. 2 minutes ago, the fox said: What about the 2 players in the box? And who said that he wouldn't score if it was 1 touch. I deleted the extra spaces, changed missed to ineligible and highlighted the key words. Perhaps it's easier to understand now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redouane Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 what's the point on talking about it now? It won't change the outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fazzyfox Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 2 minutes ago, potter3 said: Mahrez strikes the ball (twice), Madley is looking right at him: The ball goes into the goal, Madley turns his head to watch: That first picture would be great for training officials, asking how many offences can you spot? Just need to photoshop in a stray dog and a beach ball and the conference would go on for hours. It always gets me how the linesman only has one job to do in this situation (now that ball over goal line is automated) yet never has the guts to say what he has seen. The keeper doesn't affect Mahrez slipping but rules are rules, he's off his line. Badley has already checked that the ball is on the spot and needs to watch for encroachment. Like a huge Argentinian guy haring into the box before the ball is kicked, that kind of thing. Double touch, absolutely correct but the thought that Badley is getting praised for being alert, eagle eyed, brave...is sickening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Maul Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 Technically, he got this right. However, technically Sterling was offside, so we have every right to feel aggrieved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
potter3 Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 2 minutes ago, BoyJones said: The rules state a retake. No they do not. From the Laws of the Game: Quote If, after the penalty kick has been taken: the kicker touches the ball again (except with his hands) before it has touched another player: • an indirect free kick is awarded to the opposing team, the kick to be taken from the place where the infringement occurred (see Law 13 – Position of Free Kick) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matty98 Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 People moaning about encroachment need to get over it, every team does it, including us. Madley made the right decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.