Bert Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 The only criticism of Mahrez is the silly run up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erlee Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 why is he still taking penalties? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clever Fox Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 16 minutes ago, foxinsox said: I hate Mahrez's stuttering run ups to penalties and have seen him miss too many that way, and screw it up today. Vardy, Slimani and Fuchs all take better penalties than Mahrez. Exactly, Personally, I think Slim or Fuchs are our best Penalty takers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammie82uk Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 39 minutes ago, Ashley said: He's Algerian mate He's about as much Algerian as Wes Morgan is Jamaican Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demoox Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 13 minutes ago, Clever Fox said: Exactly, Personally, I think Slim or Fuchs are our best Penalty takers. They only scored 1 goal, if Mahrez is the penalty taker, maybe there's a reason? Messi, Ronaldo miss PK, with the amount Mahrez has to deal with, it's pretty obvious that he's more exposed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammie82uk Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 The only thing is about this penalty which in my opinion was a wrongly given one is that the refs generally poor performance and all his other mistakes are going to be glossed over due to a freak event that he managed to get right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katieakita Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 3 minutes ago, jammie82uk said: The only thing is about this penalty which in my opinion was a wrongly given one is that the refs generally poor performance and all his other mistakes are going to be glossed over due to a freak event that he managed to get right Thing is though he did not get it right the correct decision was to disallow the penalty and order a retake due to the encroachment from 3 players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number 6 Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 The penalty decision was spot on. Encroachment means nothing unless mahrez misses a fairly taken penalty. 2 touches is a foul take and free kick the other way. I think the rules are fair here to be honest. Lesson learned: don't do shitty run ups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammie82uk Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 6 minutes ago, katieakita said: Thing is though he did not get it right the correct decision was to disallow the penalty and order a retake due to the encroachment from 3 players you would be forever taking penalties over and over again if that rule was completely enforced the encroachment has only been brought up because of the nature of the penalty if mahrez had scored legitimately nobody would be bothered about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katieakita Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 4 minutes ago, Number 6 said: The penalty decision was spot on. Encroachment means nothing unless mahrez misses a fairly taken penalty. 2 touches is a foul take and free kick the other way. I think the rules are fair here to be honest. Lesson learned: don't do shitty run ups. Not quite sure of your logic here, our punishment for breaking the rules was the goal being disallowed Man City's punishment for 3 players encroaching was?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluetintedspecs Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 Football for you! received_1340190456071755.mp4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katieakita Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 1 minute ago, jammie82uk said: you would be forever taking penalties over and over again if that rule was completely enforced the encroachment has only been brought up because of the nature of the penalty if mahrez had scored legitimately nobody would be bothered about it No because as soon as refs started enforcing the laws keepers would stay on the line and players would stay out the box Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m4DD0gg Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 3 hours ago, foxes21 said: https://streamable.com/ctyyy - replay of the penalty. Watch Bob Madley when Riyad strikes the ball. Madley is looking towards the goalkeeper when he strikes it, so how could he see the two touches. Bob Madley is influenced by the Man City players reaction, he didn't even see the two touches by Riyad. Also, you can clearly see two Man City players in the box before Riyad strikes the ball, so it should have been a re-take anyway. The real tragedy here is letting Mahrez be the penalty taker. How many has he fluffed now. He never looks confident and his stupid staggered run ups dont help him either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facecloth Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 11 minutes ago, katieakita said: No because as soon as refs started enforcing the laws keepers would stay on the line and players would stay out the box Exactly. Never understood the arguments like that. It's like when people say you can start punishing certain offences with red cards or penalties because it would result in countless red cards or penalties every game. Well yeah, that's point, 10 penalties or 5/6 red cards a game then players would soon stop doing whatever it is you're trying to stamp out, and it's the same for this. Enforce the law and they'll soon stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themightyfin Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 I know we have been working on 2 touch football in training but Mahrez took it to the extreme today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spudulike Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 So is there a conclusion to this ?? Retaken... yes or no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozartfox Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 19 minutes ago, katieakita said: No because as soon as refs started enforcing the laws keepers would stay on the line and players would stay out the box Absolutely.. The fact he saw the double contact and chose to ignore the encroachment (also in his line of vision) proves he made a large and costly error. We were done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox92 Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 Mahrez shouldn't be our main penalty taker and he shouldn't do stupid run ups Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number 6 Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 30 minutes ago, katieakita said: Not quite sure of your logic here, our punishment for breaking the rules was the goal being disallowed Man City's punishment for 3 players encroaching was?? 2 players and no punishment because the 2 touch take was a foul. If Mahrez had taken one touch and missed then the encroachment should have been punished. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 1 minute ago, Number 6 said: 2 players and no punishment because the 2 touch take was a foul. If Mahrez had taken one touch and missed then the encroachment should have been punished. And the encroachment happened first... if we're applying the laws rigidly then the ref should stop it in the run up and start again. Besides which the law says: a player of both teams infringes the Laws of the Game, the kick is retaken unless a player commits a more serious offence (e.g. illegal feinting) is two touches a more serious offence than encroachment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieG Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 20 minutes ago, Spudulike said: So is there a conclusion to this ?? Retaken... yes or no I think we should restart the debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number 6 Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 6 minutes ago, The Doctor said: And the encroachment happened first... if we're applying the laws rigidly then the ref should stop it in the run up and start again. Besides which the law says: a player of both teams infringes the Laws of the Game, the kick is retaken unless a player commits a more serious offence (e.g. illegal feinting) is two touches a more serious offence than encroachment? But the encroachment offense is strange because it's dependent on outcome. A Leicester player encroachment is only a foul if the penalty is legitimately scored. So in this instance it's after the foul of two touches by Mahrez and so the correct decision was made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katieakita Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 11 minutes ago, Number 6 said: But the encroachment offense is strange because it's dependent on outcome. A Leicester player encroachment is only a foul if the penalty is legitimately scored. So in this instance it's after the foul of two touches by Mahrez and so the correct decision was made. They would not be encroaching if it happened after the penalty was taken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LcFc_Smiv Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 As far as I am aware,maybe wrongly. While there is encroachment, it is over-ruled by the double touch which is classed as a more serious offence, so Madley was correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionheart10 Posted 13 May 2017 Share Posted 13 May 2017 2 hours ago, Ashley said: He's Algerian mate Your Nationality is determined by your place of birth mate not what National Team you play for,he was born in France which makes him French. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.