Bernieboots76 Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 Just read this article and it throws up some interesting ideas. The most common sense one for me is the scoreboard linked to the ref watch. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40311889
StanSP Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 hate this one: Quote Another proposal would see players not being allowed to follow up and score if a penalty is saved - if the spot-kick "is not successful", play would stop and a goal-kick awarded. if it ain't broke don't fvcking fix it
Phube Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 a goal-kick being taken on the same side that the ball went out on I thought that was a rule!? Used to be when I played in Primary school!
Filbert_Ross Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 8 minutes ago, Phube said: a goal-kick being taken on the same side that the ball went out on I thought that was a rule!? Used to be when I played in Primary school! I remember when it changed so the keeper could take it wherever in the 6 yard box.
Vancouverfox Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 Hope they don't change halve lengths really no point to doing it. Edit: the dead ball rules look ridiculous allowing someone to pass to them selves will mean no one will ever cross a ball in for a corner
leftbackinthechangingroom Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 I don't mind the player leaving the field anywhere instead of the halfway line for a substitution and the clearer definition of handball but other then that majority of them just seem stupid
yorkie1999 Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 we only get 60 minutes of football can't be right. I'd be in favour of 90 minutes and stop the clock, or even 80 as they do in rugby
Stadt Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 Penalties for passbacks is shit, I like indirect freekicks in the box because it's exciting
jammie82uk Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 The only thing on that list that makes sense to me is referees can only blow for half-time or full-time when the ball goes out of play if we are going to stop the clock for all them situations like suggested the game will just drag on the game will end up being like NFL with games being upwards of 4 hours
Sir Shep Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 1 hour ago, StanSP said: hate this one: if it ain't broke don't fvcking fix it This.
tom27111 Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 44 minutes ago, yorkie1999 said: we only get 60 minutes of football can't be right. I'd be in favour of 90 minutes and stop the clock, or even 80 as they do in rugby The ball is only in play for around 60 minutes per game. The best way to stop time wasting would be half an hour each way, with the clock stopped every time the ball wasn't in play. Marco van Basten suggested this a few years ago.
Clever Fox Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 If they reduced the match time to 30 minutes I wouldn't be bothered going. I'd keep 45 minutes Each Half Game only ends with Ball out of play. Clocks stops every time play stops and added at the end of each half. Penalty scored or missed would avoid the DRINKWATER incident Hand Ball rule more clarity needed. These are the most important issues along with Video Evidence. The rest I'd leave alone.
AKCJ Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 1 hour ago, jammie82uk said: The only thing on that list that makes sense to me is referees can only blow for half-time or full-time when the ball goes out of play if we are going to stop the clock for all them situations like suggested the game will just drag on the game will end up being like NFL with games being upwards of 4 hours It wouldn't though. The winning team just has to win the ball back and boot it out for a throw. Edit; I think I misread your post
Fox92 Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 Like I keep saying, they are totally killing football right in front of us.
davieG Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 The time thing might be for good intentions to ensure the paying customer gets value for money but would be difficult to filter down to local football level plus I'm not sure the TV companies would be so keen on such an open ended option, true they have to cater for extra time in cup games but not for your every day league game. Besides they could still do something about time wasting instead of booking players which is no real deterrent why not just indicate that they're adding 30secs onto the game time. Like wise with subs have specific time added on and add an extra 30 secs if they go over the time. With injuries they need to be stricter especially when you see an injured player come back onto the pitch before collapsing.
norwichfox Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 I sense this is the foundation for "American Football" style broadcasts coming with time-outs etc. with breaks for Adverts throughout the game, and if that happens, I'll not watch another game, some of the discussions will make sense if rules are slightly modified...but we all know hat the ref will still get surrounded by "the big clubs" whatever the outcome.
Nalis Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 You know what would happen if they had stoppages during halves right? More adverts on TV mid play with the possibility of play not restarting until TV ads have been completed.
Nalis Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 6 minutes ago, norwichfox said: I sense this is the foundation for "American Football" style broadcasts coming with time-outs etc. with breaks for Adverts throughout the game, and if that happens, I'll not watch another game, some of the discussions will make sense if rules are slightly modified...but we all know hat the ref will still get surrounded by "the big clubs" whatever the outcome. Jeez, great minds, etc....
jammie82uk Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 1 hour ago, AKCJ said: It wouldn't though. The winning team just has to win the ball back and boot it out for a throw. Edit; I think I misread your post No worries it is two separate points but don't look that clear reading it back now
justfoxes Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 Why do they have to mess with tradition, it's always been 45min per half?? Ffs what's next corner flags to be scrapped for flashing lights?? I'd just wish they would concentrate on technology to stop the cheats rather than mess with tradition they could also introduce sin bins as per rugby for time wasters etc rather than mess with the times of the half don't really wish to see football changing rules about times of halves !!
yorkie1999 Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 3 hours ago, tom27111 said: The ball is only in play for around 60 minutes per game. The best way to stop time wasting would be half an hour each way, with the clock stopped every time the ball wasn't in play. Marco van Basten suggested this a few years ago. So we'd still end up with 45 minutes for each half, so what's the actual point of doing it
davieG Posted 17 June 2017 Posted 17 June 2017 1 minute ago, yorkie1999 said: So we'd still end up with 45 minutes for each half, so what's the actual point of doing it All change is good don't you know. Standing still is not an option in the modern world.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.