Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
FoxInTheBirstallBox

ALL HAIL KING RUDKIN

By FoxInTheBirstallBox, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted

Innocent until proven Guilty chaps.  Lets wait until tomorrow.  FIFA are afterall a bunch of corrupt Merchant Bankers without ethics. 

Julian Joachim Jr Shabadoo

Julian Joachim Jr Shabadoo

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, mozartfox said:

Innocent until proven Guilty chaps.  Lets wait until tomorrow.  FIFA are afterall a bunch of corrupt Merchant Bankers without ethics. 

What's happening tomorrow? There's nothing to suggest we have successfully signed Silva, and the buck stops with Rudkin - surely he should have been covering all the bases on deadline day (and it shouldn't have needed to go to the wire) to make sure the signing was all done and dusted in time

 

I have a job involving working to tight deadlines - it's generally low responsibility but if a deadline is missed on my part, I would expect to get a massive bollocking/disciplinary action.

mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Julian Joachim Jr Shabadoo said:

What's happening tomorrow? There's nothing to suggest we have successfully signed Silva, and the buck stops with Rudkin - surely he should have been covering all the bases on deadline day (and it shouldn't have needed to go to the wire) to make sure the signing was all done and dusted in time

 

I have a job involving working to tight deadlines - it's generally low responsibility but if a deadline is missed on my part, I would expect to get a massive bollocking/disciplinary action.

I agree with you 200%. I am just saying Rudkin is innocent until it transpires he or a member of his staff have indeed screwed up.  If guilty, then he should be removed.

Julian Joachim Jr Shabadoo

Julian Joachim Jr Shabadoo

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, mozartfox said:

I agree with you 200%. I am just saying Rudkin is innocent until it transpires he or a member of his staff have indeed screwed up.  If guilty, then he should be removed.

Yeah fair enough, I suppose there's a chance Sporting could have been messing around. Just feels that there should have been a solution beforehand, and if his signing hinged on Drinkwater leaving then we should have demanded dealings with Chelsea ended earlier in the day. What other cases like this have occurred before? If we were unsuccessful in an appeal, does anything happen?

 

bpfox

bpfox

Posted
Posted

deal should have included a clause if silva did not go through then Danny remained a foxes player. bet u all Chelsea would have made sure we got silva.

Buce

Buce

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, mozartfox said:

I agree with you 200%. I am just saying Rudkin is innocent until it transpires he or a member of his staff have indeed screwed up.  If guilty, then he should be removed.

 

What kind of a witch hunt do you call that?

 

We need to form an angry mob. 

DJ Barry Hammond

DJ Barry Hammond

Posted
Posted
On 02/09/2017 at 11:11, Swan Lesta said:

In a modern 442 with a CM pairing I'd be looking to see if I could play Iborra as a 4 and Silva as an 8 with two wingers either side. Harsh on Ndidi but that's what I'd like to see when everybody is fit! 

 

300px-Formation_evolution.jpg

 

So on the right hand picture Iborra to sit in front of the back four, Silva in front etc...

 

I must have missed the traditional years of the 2-3-5.

 

Was that played in the 1930's/40's?

  • Haha 1
norwichfox

norwichfox

Posted
Posted
On 9/2/2017 at 11:11, Swan Lesta said:

In a modern 442 with a CM pairing I'd be looking to see if I could play Iborra as a 4 and Silva as an 8 with two wingers either side. Harsh on Ndidi but that's what I'd like to see when everybody is fit! 

 

300px-Formation_evolution.jpg

 

So on the right hand picture Iborra to sit in front of the back four, Silva in front etc...

Kind of puts me in mind of the map at the beginning of Dad's Army....lol

reynard

reynard

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, 4everfox said:

Just out of curiosity, does anyone actually have any proof that Rudkin is to blame for any failed transfers that have happened in the past or is he just a scapegoat? 

He's Director of Football, if he has nothing to do with transfers then what the hell is he doing? Can't say his time involved with the youth set up has been that successful either.

As a director he's a senior member of club management and thus must take responsibility for things such as transfers which happen under his watch.

BigMicky

BigMicky

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, reynard said:

He's Director of Football, if he has nothing to do with transfers then what the hell is he doing? Can't say his time involved with the youth set up has been that successful either.

As a director he's a senior member of club management and thus must take responsibility for things such as transfers which happen under his watch.

What happens if his boss interjected? Susan Whelan ever get involved? Your just looking at someone to aim your fury at and it's pathetic.

4everfox

4everfox

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, reynard said:

He's Director of Football, if he has nothing to do with transfers then what the hell is he doing? Can't say his time involved with the youth set up has been that successful either.

As a director he's a senior member of club management and thus must take responsibility for things such as transfers which happen under his watch.

So he's a scapegoat then. Being the Director of Football could mean a whole host of things not even connected to the transfer side of the club. Without categorical proof of Rudkin's involvement in transfers then surely the logical thing to do would be to point the finger at the Head of Recruitment, it's literally Macia's job. 

  • Like 1
Chrysalis

Chrysalis

Posted
Posted (edited)

rudkin can do no wrong apparently :)

 

The guy is a liability sorry.

 

Rudkin is senior to head of recruitment and the manager, he is the highest position for pure footballing matters.

Edited by Chrysalis
4everfox

4everfox

Posted
Posted
Just now, Chrysalis said:

rudkin can do no wrong apparently :)

 

The guy is a liability sorry.

 

Rudkin is senior to head of recruitment and the manager, he is the highest position for pure footballing matters.

I'd like to reiterate my desire to see some evidence to back up your claim, which appears to be nothing more then a slanderous accusation. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...