Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

Don't know why everyone thinks it's 352. Don't think Puel is going to randomly change formation with less than a week to practice it. 

 

Dragovic will just be RB surely. 

I know why... because of the usual weird fetish on here about 3 at the back and thinking it makes more sense to change your whole formation, rather than just shift a fairly mobile cb to rb.

 

Welcome to foxestalk.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
Just now, Babylon said:

I know why... because of the usual weird fetish on here about 3 at the back and thinking it makes more sense to change your whole formation, rather than just shift a fairly mobile cb to rb.

 

Welcome to foxestalk.

Probably something to do with the inclusion of 3 CBs and 2 capable WBs?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Beechey said:

Probably something to do with the inclusion of 3 CBs and 2 capable WBs?

We don't have a right back. I'm sorry but if people think switching your whole system and formation to suit not having a right back, over just pushing over a cb, then they are mental.

Posted
1 minute ago, Babylon said:

We don't have a right back. I'm sorry but if people think switching your whole system and formation to suit not having a right back, over just pushing over a cb, then they are mental.

You're acting like we've never played 3 at the back, though. We quite frequently switch to it during games, just look at us last game. Does look likely it will be Dragovic at RB though, but it's not as far fetched as you seem to think for it to be a back 3.

 

Thankfully Dragovic is quite mobile and decent on the ball.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Ulloa and Slamani lol One is incompetent and the other one is supposedly leaving. Neither are good enough. Seems ridiculous not having Nacho on the bench at atleast.

Edited by Larry_LCFC
Posted
28 minutes ago, adam said:

Ulloa and Slimani on the Bench. Whats the point. Ian Nacho unfairly treated imo.

Nacho is paid tens of thousands a week and is a piss poor footballer. Definitely unfair

Posted
12 minutes ago, DatfoxesKid23 said:

Image result for boxing day 1963 match day results

tottenham 5-southampton 2 I wonder the rest of the scorelines will be today

 

11 minutes ago, DrezZone said:

When everyone was drunklol

Apart from us apparently... 3 teams scored more than us and  didn't win!

Posted
4 minutes ago, Claridge said:

Nacho is paid tens of thousands a week and is a piss poor footballer. Definitely unfair

How is he a piss poor footballer? We've hardly seen him play. 

Posted

 

Its been clear that Iborra has dropped off a bit recently.

 

Remember that he has come from an entirely different type of football, he’s still getting used to it here.

 

If resting him gets us the brilliance back, in a really busy period of matches, then it looks sensible.

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...