Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Walkers said:

 

Does 7 assists mean he has only ever put in 7 good crosses? It's impossible that the attackers may have fluffed their lines? Your case is daft

oh right the attacking quality of Manchester united is terrible I forgot...

 

if you've actually watched him you'd realise he isn't very good.

Posted
8 minutes ago, fazzyfox said:

The annoying thing is that they get in such good positions and get fed such good balls, it got to the point where I questioned why Simpson even tries to cross it when his previous seventeen attempts have not come off. Stay on the training ground and work on it, I'm not asking you to be Beckham just be able to lift the ball off the ground when necessary and put it past the first defender. Chilwell seems to have a reluctance to cross unless everything is set up perfectly in front of him with time and space to pick someone out - maybe the attitude Simpson should have. We play with two wingers and two centre halves so the full backs first role is to defend solidly, it's just so frustrating that they do get up there into good positions, so it's not about not joining in or having the engine to get up and down, it's about how little comes of it and how many attacks break down due to it.

Atleast he tries to cross it. Chillwell needs work in the summer to cross the ball and get confident at it. The 100s of crap crosses I've seen from Roberto Carlos should be enough to convince him he can't shy away. 

 

Brilliant spirited performance but we are quality and should look at these games and we should have won. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Walkers said:

Players are allowed to accept a drop in wages

 

I see your point but his situation is different in how he wants to leave the club.

He wouldn’t accept less than 100k a week,

i mean,how will he feed his kids and put a roof over there head on such a small salary:blink:

Posted
33 minutes ago, SkidsFox said:

Am I expecting too much, or do we need to get 2 who can?

Full backs aren't really expected to cross.  Danny Simpson is a good fullback but a poor wing back.  If Puel persists with these tactics then we need two wingbacks, rather than fullbacks.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, lcfc sheff said:

in terms of attacking output, its fullbacks of the ilk of Trippier that we need at this club. Soares and Bertrand aren't as good attacking wise as people seem to think on here. 

Unfortunately they are still upgrades on what we have and realistic. I'd be surprised if Spurs sold Trippier to us but no doubting his quality. I think that ship sailed a while ago.

Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, lcfc sheff said:

luke shaw is no better, literally a slightly better chilwell.

 

27 minutes ago, Walkers said:

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

 

25 minutes ago, lcfc sheff said:

Think it was probably the juxtaposition in your statement that received the Hmmmmmm reply.

If not, it should have been.

Edited by Max Wall
Posted
25 minutes ago, lcfcdamo said:

Fuchs can pass and defiantly cross joke how hes not playing 

Chilwell is defiant in his crossing, doesn’t mean they’re any good

Posted
18 minutes ago, lcfc sheff said:

oh right the attacking quality of Manchester united is terrible I forgot...

 

if you've actually watched him you'd realise he isn't very good.

If you've watched as much Man Utd as you claim you would know that Man Utd's conversion rate is shocking.

Posted

Would love Swansea and Southampton to go down and go in for Naughton and Bertrand. 

Simpson genuinely can't kick a ball. I don't know if it's hilarious or frustrating. Both, really. 

  • Like 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, lcfc sheff said:

I don't see the point in citing assists as an important factor in a full-back's game?

 

It's about defending and providing link-up play going forward, nothing else. If you manage to chip in an assist or (behave) even a goal, good on you.

But those are not the main selling points.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, MC Prussian said:

I don't see the point in citing assists as an important factor in a full-back's game?

 

It's about defending and providing link-up play going forward, nothing else. If you manage to chip in an assist or (behave) even a goal, good on you.

But those are not the main selling points.

one of the points of this thread is regarding fullbacks that can cross, that stat somewhat proves his crossing isn't that great.

Posted
30 minutes ago, desertfox2 said:

Unfortunately they are still upgrades on what we have and realistic. I'd be surprised if Spurs sold Trippier to us but no doubting his quality. I think that ship sailed a while ago.

oh no doubting that, but for the unrealistic wants of some of our fans I think they'd be bitterly disappointed if they ever played a game for us.

Posted
2 minutes ago, lcfc sheff said:

one of the points of this thread is regarding fullbacks that can cross, that stat somewhat proves his crossing isn't that great.

Good crossing doesn't equal assists galore.

Posted

Simpson's dogshit but I think Chilwell is alright. His crossing is hit or miss, but I find the crosses are improving.

 

Do not buy Luke Shaw. 3 managers have critisized his attitude and he looks like he lives off kebabs

Posted

Both, particularly Simpson have defo been encouraged to get forward more under Puel, but their delivery is absolutely garbage. Simpsons is beyond embarrassing for a modern day Prem full back. He's a fine defender, but attacking wise utterly woeful. Sorry Danny I can not lie!!

  • Like 1
Posted

Has Chilwell ever made a decision in his life?  So frustrating today watching him take a player on, shy away from a cross and pass short into a corner.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...