How much is Maguire worth?

[TeaMen Tom]

To me the concern would be that after hanging out with his England mates the past several weeks he decides that he wants to join a couple of them on a big club.  Hopefully he looks at Stones situation and realizes that the grass isn't always greener when you go to one.

[Fox 4 Life]

Genuinely think playing for England is the pinnacle for Harry and he will think twice about threatening that by joining a big 4 team and potentially rotating or sitting on the bench.

 

For me is VVD is worth 75m after an injury and dodgy year or so then slab head has to be worth 80m+

[ARM1968]

Carey’s on like this and ge’ll Be the first £100 million defender. 

[joachim1965]

Scary Carey worth 100m , wow.

[gurru991]

Half of the scabby tabloid pundits are telling anyone who will listen that Harry will be moving on to a "big club" after the WC.

[Bazly]

ESPN recon he will be off because he is too good for little Leicester. Spuds are leading the rumour pack at £50mn.

 

May as well sell Schmeichel, Ndidi, Mahrez, and Vardy this Summer then we can build a team around Morgan, James, Simpson, King and co. How come our Championship quality players never seem to leave?

[manders86]

Keep having a little chuckle every time I read an article that quotes him at 60m, no way we would part for that right now. Also saw one article that described him as £22.5m valued Leicester player! I think he is worth at least 85m on current market values, but to us I think he's priceless and we should build the squad around him.

[yorkie1999]

51 minutes ago, Bazly said:

ESPN recon he will be off because he is too good for little Leicester. Spuds are leading the rumour pack at £50mn.

 

May as well sell Schmeichel, Ndidi, Mahrez, and Vardy this Summer then we can build a team around Morgan, James, Simpson, King and co. How come our Championship quality players never seem to leave?

He'll be off when he's got 12 months left on his contract, do they not realise that clubs in the prem don't need to sell if they don't want to anymore.

[Nod.E]

I've heard £58M to United. This summer.

 

Chinese whispers from someone who knows the odd person, so could just as easily be b*llocks.

[Donut]

We have a mythical value we want for him.

Big club looks at him, estimates mythical value and offers £10 million less.

Player has the hump that we dont let him join big club despite them not meeting our valuation.

Player proceeds to play at 50% of his capability

Player ends up leaving anyway for £15 million less than our valuation.

[Jattdogg]

150 million or feck off because we dont need to sell. If you MUST have him then pay up.

 

He aint worth that but any big club can do one. Time to make our club richer

 

[Guest]

As you know I've championed Maguire and think he's great for us, but if I'm honest and he wants to leave I'd take a record fee for him. I think we have a few very good young CBs in our squad who can perform. I really want to see Sam Hughes given time. He defends well and knows better than many attackers how to score. 

[OhYesNdidi]

8 minutes ago, FIF said:

As you know I've championed Maguire and think he's great for us, but if I'm honest and he wants to leave I'd take a record fee for him. I think we have a few very good young CBs in our squad who can perform. I really want to see Sam Hughes given time. He defends well and knows better than many attackers how to score. 

So if we were to sell Maguire, for £50/60m you'd replace him with sam Hughes? Didn't you question Riyad saying he needed to leave to improve in the other thread? Ambition. 

Edited 12 July 2018 by OhYesNdidi

[les-tah]

I wish people would stop comparing Maguire and Ronaldo we should just enjoy them both whilst they are playing in our lifetimes.

Edited 12 July 2018 by les-tah

[UpTheLeagueFox]

He's not a huge fan of Puel, apparently.

It would be more of a story if he loved him, given how the dressing room feel.

Edited 12 July 2018 by UpTheLeagueFox

[OhYesNdidi]

5 minutes ago, UpTheLeagueFox said:

He's not a huge fan of Puel, apparently.

It would be more of a story if he loved him, given how the dressing room feel.

 

 

[les-tah]

7 minutes ago, UpTheLeagueFox said:

He's not a huge fan of Puel, apparently.

It would be more of a story if he loved him, given how the dressing room feel.

 

ive heard its Morgan, Kasper, Vardy and that old gang that arnt the fans. Maguire seems far too much of a pro to let that out!

Edited 12 July 2018 by les-tah

[UpTheLeagueFox]

3 minutes ago, les-tah said:

ive heard its Morgan, Kasper, Vardy and that old gang that arnt the fans. Maguire seems far too much of a pro to let that out!

 

Some of the newer players aren't either

[les-tah]

1 minute ago, UpTheLeagueFox said:

Some of the newer players aren't either

its all abit odd if this many players apparently dont like him that much considering the vote of confidence and him still in charge.

[UpTheLeagueFox]

2 minutes ago, les-tah said:

its all abit odd if this many players apparently dont like him that much considering the vote of confidence and him still in charge.

The owners don't want to be seen firing too often. However, Puel won't last long if they start poorly. The feeling is he's on borrowed time, despite the backing.

[OhYesNdidi]

21 minutes ago, UpTheLeagueFox said:

The owners don't want to be seen firing too often. However, Puel won't last long if they start poorly. The feeling is he's on borrowed time, despite the backing.

If he's only 2/3 losses away from the sack, what's the point in keeping him on? 

[Ian S]

7 minutes ago, OhYesNdidi said:

If he's only 2/3 losses away from the sack, what's the point in keeping him on? 

That is the point ,he should have gone at the end of the season.Surely you do not think he can survive a poor start? I did not think anyone had that view based on his record over the last 20+ games.

[les-tah]

34 minutes ago, UpTheLeagueFox said:

The owners don't want to be seen firing too often. However, Puel won't last long if they start poorly. The feeling is he's on borrowed time, despite the backing.

 

11 minutes ago, OhYesNdidi said:

If he's only 2/3 losses away from the sack, what's the point in keeping him on? 

 

1 minute ago, Ian S said:

That is the point ,he should have gone at the end of the season.Surely you do not think he can survive a poor start? I did not think anyone had that view based on his record over the last 20+ games.

To be fair most of the managers in the premier league will be sacked if they lose the majority of their first  run of games. That is the reality these days.

[brucey]

7 minutes ago, OhYesNdidi said:

If he's only 2/3 losses away from the sack, what's the point in keeping him on? 

We needed a manager, any manager, in place for our summer recruitment. We would have missed out on our targets if we had sacked him at the end of the season, as we clearly haven't found a good enough replacement, and players tend not to join managerless clubs. (See Chelsea)

 

I think it's very plausible that quite a few of the old and new players aren't fans of his. They probably know he's on very shaky ground and would back themselves to be around longer than him, so hopefully they won't push to leave because of Puel.

[KingsX]

34 minutes ago, UpTheLeagueFox said:

The owners don't want to be seen firing too often. However, Puel won't last long if they start poorly. The feeling is he's on borrowed time, despite the backing.

So Jacques Bonnevay could be our caretaker for October matches?