Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Leicester_lad_92 said:

C/S  Points per game: 1.50
Puel Points per game: 1.43
Scary isnt it

Not really. Shakey had 26 games, Puel has had 31. As time goes on, the more games you manage the lower your win % and PPG are likely to go unless you're a manager of an elite team.

 

Craig Shakespeare   

P26 W11 D6 L9    42.31% win rate


Claude Puel

P31 W12 D10 L9    38.7% win rate

 

So Puel has played 5 games more, but lost the same amount of games. He's won a single game more, which is an issue, but he has also picked up more draws in the main. To me that's no surprise for a team in transition - we're trying to change a lot, from defence to attack, and it's not clicking just yet. Give him 10 more games minimum, and then we'll be better able to judge.

 

That doesn't mean I'm not worried (and stats are stats blah blah), but you can SEE that our style is changing. You can SEE how our players are having to adapt, and problems are occurring. These things take time. Have patience.

 

On topic: I'm sure I've heard chants for Puel (positive ones), even if it's just "Claude Puel's blue and white army", so this isn't an issue for me.

 

 
Posted
2 hours ago, Leicester_lad_92 said:

C/S  Points per game: 1.50
Puel Points per game: 1.43
Scary isnt it

No.

 

Puel has managed more games so he's bound to have less.

Posted

Puel has appeared to be wank so far, but I'm giving him a little more time - no signs of genuine improvement by Christmas and he's got to go.

 

the damning thing for him is he now has a better squad than Pearson, Ranieri and Shakespeare all did and he's not producing a good team from it CURRENTLY.

Posted
1 hour ago, Arriba Los Zorros said:

Puel has appeared to be wank so far, but I'm giving him a little more time - no signs of genuine improvement by Christmas and he's got to go.

 

the damning thing for him is he now has a better squad than Pearson, Ranieri and Shakespeare all did and he's not producing a good team from it CURRENTLY.

You're saying he has a better squad at his disposal than the one that literally won the Premier League?

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Voll Blau said:

You're saying he has a better squad at his disposal than the one that literally won the Premier League?

One could argue better squad but not team

 

A squad is a collection of individuals who coordinate their individual efforts. On the other hand, a team is a group of people who share a common team purpose and a number of challenging goals. Members of the team are mutually committed to the goals and to each other.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Voll Blau said:

You're saying he has a better squad at his disposal than the one that literally won the Premier League?

In terms of actual skill and quality players yes! However that was a much better TEAM with better tactics

Posted
2 hours ago, Arriba Los Zorros said:

In terms of actual skill and quality players yes! However that was a much better TEAM with better tactics

So the players we have now are better than Kante, Mahrez and Drinkwater? Who are they?

Posted
5 minutes ago, Corky said:

So the players we have now are better than Kante, Mahrez and Drinkwater? Who are they?

Not Kante and Mahrez, but I think the players that have been brought in are more comfortable on the ball than what we had. But the style we played back then is completely different, our new guys would potentially be pants at how we used to play 

Posted
5 hours ago, FoxInTheBirstallBox said:

Might aswell re-use the Andy king chant now he's not playing 

 

Puel, puel

Claudy claudy puel.

First he was alright

Now he's shite

Claudy claudy puel

Fixed

Posted
3 hours ago, Arriba Los Zorros said:

In terms of actual skill and quality players yes! However that was a much better TEAM with better tactics

No way.

 

People need to realise we have lost our two class players in Mahrez and Kante. Our squad is 'average' as they say, there's no difference in our squad and a side like Bournemouth.

Posted

Also why do we chant Claude puels blue and white army everyone knows it’s 

 

Claude puels blue with a little bit of gold detailing cos it’s the national colour of Thailand and all that’s good with those Thai folk who won us the premier league ARMEH

Posted
22 hours ago, worthosoriginals said:

 cambiasso sorted him a plan b?

Really can we drop this notion. If this has any truth then the people that want Pearson back want us relegated. Pearson is his own man and I don't see him doing what a player says. I'm not saying Cambiasso didn't have a say but really if the great escape was down to him why is he not our manager. 

Guest Bob Hazels shorts
Posted
37 minutes ago, sylofox said:

Really can we drop this notion. If this has any truth then the people that want Pearson back want us relegated. Pearson is his own man and I don't see him doing what a player says. I'm not saying Cambiasso didn't have a say but really if the great escape was down to him why is he not our manager. 

He did +

 

I saw Cambiasso and family taking a stroll through our glorious city center one Sunday afternoon, They looked lost and pitiful, I wanted to apologize for the state of it.

 

Regardless of if he could do the Job, there's more to life.

 

The worlds his oyster

Posted
On 18/09/2018 at 12:54, Carl the Llama said:

Claude Puel

Claude Puel

Dormez vous?

Dormez vous?

Jouez trois cinq deux

Jouez trois cinq deux

Merci beaucoup

Merci beaucoup

I'm expecting you to get the stadium singing this now

 

Maybe with first line changed to 'Monsieur Puel' and third to 'Jouez trois-quatre-un-deux' to fit the rhyming scheme

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...