Ayoze Pérez

[SecretPro]

Just now, Dahnsouff said:

Ffs, he was ok until he did that thing that was an unintentional red colour piece of paper

Shall we have a look at his stats since he signed for us? As an 'Attacking' player. West Ham knew how to attack today, en masse. We have nothing similar, just a faint hope that Vardy winds back the clock and we sign a wide right forward that actually knows how to pass and score. 

[Alex_LCFC]

Was a complete accident. 
 

could be a blessing in disguise, 3 games now without a RW could push the club to sign a new one. Already needed one new one more now 

[FoxOnWheels]

1 hour ago, BenTheFox said:

I don't think he's a dreadful footballer. I've seen far worse following the city but he possesses literally none of the traits of a top half premier league winger. He's not quick, he doesn't put in a good cross or take a good set piece, he doesn't have a trick in him and doesn't score from outside the box.  Albrighton for all his limitations offers us at least one of those things. 

You missed out doesn’t score from inside the box, but spot on

[funkyrobot]

Up until Perez got sent off, he was our best attacking player tonight. That’s an uncomfortable fact that Perez haters will ignore. Maddison, Vardy and Barnes were all playing worse. Perez was taking that ball on the turn and trying to inject some speed into our play. 

[Unabomber]

16 minutes ago, pmcla26 said:

Let’s all slate him for an accident shall we ? 

I think people are slating him for being absolutely wank for us and never actually doing anything. The sending off was the icing on the cake. He shouldn’t play for us again, and that’s not me being flippant. It is just the way it is. 

Edited 23 August 2021 by Unabomber

[Dahnsouff]

Just now, SecretPro said:

Shall we have a look at his stats since he signed for us? As an 'Attacking' player. West Ham knew how to attack today, en masse. We have nothing similar, just a faint hope that Vardy winds back the clock and we sign a wide right forward that actually knows how to pass and score. 

No, it’s ok, I prefer a more contemporary tally system thanks. Oh, and what you think and Rodges think, may differ as to what constitutes an attacking player. Just a thought 

[FoxOnWheels]

6 minutes ago, Dr The Singh said:

He wasn't bad today, yes it was an accident, but it was reckless, in today's game.it is a red

Wasn’t bad? He had a chance which at the very least should of been a shot on target, he shanked the ****er that bad no one knew if it was actually a shot

[AjcW]

I feel like as a group of fans, we love a tryer, someone who gives their all, and even when they’re not the best, as long as they make an effort we take to them and accept them. 
 

This bloke doesn’t have a single likeable quality. He hardly moves, hardly makes an effort, breaks rules and just generally looks happy picking up his pay cheque for minimal output. 
 

Bin

Edited 23 August 2021 by AjcW

[cruzFOX]

5 minutes ago, Dr The Singh said:

He wasn't bad today, yes it was an accident, but it was reckless, in today's game.it is a red

I agree with you it's one of them things in a split second moment he chose to do that and it ended up looking so bad there was only going to be one outcome. Plus how big is that screen at the stadium? They had it looping over and over at the moment of contact lol. Ahh F it - was a really bad performance all round. Let's shake it off and take it out on Norwich.

[Dr The Singh]

Just now, FoxOnWheels said:

Wasn’t bad? He had a chance which at the very least should of been a shot on target, he shanked the ****er that bad no one knew if it was actually a shot

I didn't say he was good

[Bob Hazels shorts]

When it’s been pointed out that he’s not that good those stating the obvious are greeted with silly your a ‘hater’ abuse.

 

I’m crap but I’d try hard, can I get a game 

[BenTheFox]

6 minutes ago, HesNotGudjonsonn2 said:

I don’t really do knee jerk reactions to our players and also try to see the good in them all and what they can do. You couldn’t trust Big Wes to pass or shoot but he could get his head on a cross, block and shot and get his body in the way. Not the greatest player but offered something and that something was important to his position on the pitch. Truth is, I just don’t see what Perez offers? In his position, I want to see goals or assists and I don’t recall seeing much of either. Such a shame.

He doesn't even have any of the attributes that could result in goals or assists either. He's not quick, doesn't have good delivery and not a box of tricks. He's just a nothing player really. 

[Dahnsouff]

1 minute ago, FoxOnWheels said:

Wasn’t bad? He had a chance which at the very least should of been a shot on target, he shanked the ****er that bad no one knew if it was actually a shot

He did, but Vardy caused the first goal. Meh, they were crap all over, no need to save the vitriol for just Perez today/I think

[FoxOnWheels]

1 minute ago, Dr The Singh said:

I didn't say he was good

Okay so he was average then? If that’s an average performance then thank god we’ve got so many players around him with a higher average or we’d be in big trouble 

[Dr The Singh]

Just now, FoxOnWheels said:

Okay so he was average then? If that’s an average performance then thank god we’ve got so many players around him with a higher average or we’d be in big trouble 

Well he has a 3 match rest, let's see who can come in and do better

[FoxOnWheels]

Just now, Dahnsouff said:

He did, but Vardy caused the first goal. Meh, they were crap all over, no need to save the vitriol for just Perez today/I think

I’m not talking about their goals in this or saying Perez was the only poor player but I can think of many times Vardy, Barnes, iheanacho, Youri, wilf have had exceptional games can you think of any for Perez bar Soton away which was a freak show?

[Bert]

I feel for him tonight. He made some good runs and got in some good positions. Whether any of you wanna believe that to suit your agenda so be it. He’s then fouled which leads to him making a horrible tackle and getting sent off. 

[Sambiasso]

The best thing to come out of tonight is knowing he'll be nowhere near the starting 11 for the next 3 games.

[ozvaldo]

3 match ban. The only positive from tonight. 

[Ric Flair]

Just now, Bert said:

I feel for him tonight. He made some good runs and got in some good positions. Whether any of you wanna believe that to suit your agenda so be it. He’s then fouled which leads to him making a horrible tackle and getting sent off. 

Gets no sympathy from me, stuff like this happens when you're as bad as he is. If you smear yourself in shit and someone then tells you you stink of shit it's because you do. Can't grumble.

[Stinkenzo]

Just now, Sambiasso said:

The best thing to come out of tonight is knowing he'll be nowhere near the starting 11 for the next 3 games.

Hope you enjoy 5 at the back then

[Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot]

4 minutes ago, funkyrobot said:

Up until Perez got sent off, he was our best attacking player tonight. That’s an uncomfortable fact that Perez haters will ignore. Maddison, Vardy and Barnes were all playing worse. Perez was taking that ball on the turn and trying to inject some speed into our play. 

I'd totally agree he was our best attacking player before he got sent off. But what credit does he have in the bank? He was only our best attacking player because everyone around us was having shockers, he wasn't exactly playing out of his skin, just his usual workmanlike performance. When barnes is on it he's unplayable, and he's on it often enough to be forgiven games like tonight and have faith in him for the next game. Can the same be said for perez? He doesn't score or assist, they're just statistical facts. I don't hate him I just think he isn't good enough, if we're going to play a workmanlike winger, why not play Albrighton, he at least puts balls over the top and can deliver a good cross. Perez just isn't good enough if we want to be pushing for Europe. 

[Nod.E]

Say what you like about the tackle, we were not getting anything from that game the way we set up. Of course going down to 10 men doesn't help, but we didn't lose because of Perez.

 

Tielemans, N'didi, Pereira, Thomas, Vardy and especially Soyuncu put in performances that were as much to do with us losing. 

 

Setting up with Pereira effectively playing right wing, and so having 3 at the back, against the best counter attacking team in the league, with the likes of Amartey playing (who will always concede possession), was suicide from Rodgers.

 

Don't just point the finger at Perez because it's easier to blame him than acknowledge we have serious problems.

[Dahnsouff]

Just now, FoxOnWheels said:

I’m not talking about their goals in this or saying Perez was the only poor player but I can think of many times Vardy, Barnes, iheanacho, Youri, wilf have had exceptional games can you think of any for Perez bar Soton away which was a freak show?

Not really tbh, he is substandard no doubt. But what does anyone gain by slagging him off? It’ll just translate to the ground, and in what world is that helpful? Or he will just console himself by burning more of our pound notes. 

[Blanchflower78]

Just now, Bert said:

I feel for him tonight. He made some good runs and got in some good positions. Whether any of you wanna believe that to suit your agenda so be it. He’s then fouled which leads to him making a horrible tackle and getting sent off. 

I see some merit in that. I too don't think he was any worse than most and did pick up some good spaces. He is limited and not good enough. Trouble is when we play slow ponderous football He is often the shining example of it. It was a red, it looked awful but don't believe it was malicious. You look at Bowen and Benrahama for them and see the difference.