Match Ratings: Wolves 0-0 Leicester City - Vote Now

[Mark]

Season: 2020/21
Voting Starts: 07/02/21
Voting Ends: 10/02/21

1. Kasper Schmeichel
2. Ricardo Pereira
3. Jonny Evans
4. Çağlar Söyüncü
5. James Justin
6. Youri Tielemans
7. Hamza Choudhury
8. Ayoze Pérez
9. James Maddison
10. Harvey Barnes
11. Kelechi Iheanacho
12. Jamie Vardy (sub)
13. Marc Albrighton (sub)

[Steve Earle]

Prince Ricky so, so far off it. He needs the minutes & will of course improve, but at the moment TC can’t come back soon enough.

[Royston.]

Only justin and choudhury had a good game. Schmeichel saved our arses....AGAIN

 

 

[deanolegend1989]

Kasper, Justin, Hamza , Tielemens 7. The rest lower.

Thought Ricardo, Barnes, Perez and Nacho were very poor today.

Special mention to Albrighton, he made a very good impact and has been fantastic this season in general, extremely underrated in general what he’s done for us.

[Blueman1967]

We could do with Under in for Perez, not a great game again

[Webbo]

6s all round. I didn't think anyone was terrible or great.

[Ian Nacho]

Schmeichel, Justin and Choudhury all played well. Rest were average. 

[bovril]

Was Perez that bad. Didn't sound it from the radio. 

[Guest Underfan]

Man of the match JJ (unplayable), Kasper is always a quality keeper but today that Diaz position was a miss rather than a save from him. Nacho really not deserved substitution why can't Leicester play with 2 strikers  any moment at a time.

[goody2028]

2 hours ago, bovril said:

Was Perez that bad. Didn't sound it from the radio. 

The rating on here flatters him 

[Sunbury Fox]

3 hours ago, bovril said:

Was Perez that bad. Didn't sound it from the radio. 

Yes.

[HighPeakFox]

4 hours ago, bovril said:

Was Perez that bad. Didn't sound it from the radio. 

No, he wasn't. That debate has been had here. Unfortunately anyone pointing out he wasn't horrendous is dubbed a Perez apologist/fan, rather than it just being people trying not to point-blank write the guy off because the noisy majority don't see (or choose not to see, possibly) anything other than his errors - errors I don't dispute he makes, I might add.

Edited 7 February 2021 by HighPeakFox

[Sampson]

Ricardo was way way worse than Perez or Maddison. I expected Ricardo to have one of the lowest ratings of the season today, but he has basically a 6?

 

Some people just have a grudge against players and also refuse to criticise their favourites.

[Heymister2015]

Just now, Sampson said:

Ricardo was way way worse than Perez or Maddison. I expected Ricardo to have one of the lowest ratings of the season today, but he has basically a 6?

 

Some people just have a grudge against players and also refuse to criticise their favourites.

He’s been out for 10 months! People expecting a performance from him are asking way too much. He needs at least another 5/10 games before being judged. Big injury for a top class player 

[Hammo]

The democratic vote delivers a resounding Yes.

 

(in response to bovril)

Edited 7 February 2021 by Hammo

[enmac]

5 hours ago, bovril said:

Was Perez that bad. Didn't sound it from the radio. 

No. He was OK IMHO. 

[NaijaFox]

5 hours ago, HighPeakFox said:

No, he wasn't. That debate has been had here. Unfortunately anyone pointing out he wasn't horrendous is dubbed a Perez apologist/fan, rather than it just being people trying not to point-blank write the guy off because the noisy majority don't see (or choose not to see, possibly) anything other than his errors - errors I don't dispute he makes, I might add.

Some choose to highlight his errors, other choose to highlight his positives, and I am sure they are some who do both (or neither).

It's all a matter of (mostly subjective) personal opinions and perceptions suited for a discussion forum. Unsure why some seem to take it personally. 

 

Edited 8 February 2021 by NaijaFox

[NaijaFox]

9 hours ago, bovril said:

Was Perez that bad. Didn't sound it from the radio. 

My personal opinion is that Perez was simply atrocious TODAY (emphasis on today).  

[WigstonWanderer]

6 hours ago, HighPeakFox said:

No, he wasn't. That debate has been had here. Unfortunately anyone pointing out he wasn't horrendous is dubbed a Perez apologist/fan, rather than it just being people trying not to point-blank write the guy off because the noisy majority don't see (or choose not to see, possibly) anything other than his errors - errors I don't dispute he makes, I might add.

Perez does work hard and sometimes looks quite good. The problem is that when he gets the ball it too often ends up with the opposition. Just think we have better options.

[HighPeakFox]

3 hours ago, NaijaFox said:

Some choose to highlight his errors, other choose to highlight his positives, and I am sure they are some who do both (or neither).

It's all a matter of (mostly subjective) personal opinions and perceptions suited for a discussion forum. Unsure why some seem to take it personally. 

 

 

2 hours ago, WigstonWanderer said:

Perez does work hard and sometimes looks quite good. The problem is that when he gets the ball it too often ends up with the opposition. Just think we have better options.

I don't disagree with a lot of that. I'm not sure why you'd think I've taken it personally, I just dislike the manner that people choose to use in their assessment as much as anything. 

 

For the record, once again, I find Perez incredibly frustrating to watch. I just try to notice the positives in amongst the errors, and there were enough not to just slate him as non league standard. 

 

Is he good enough for a top 4 team? Perhaps not. But for now, the man in charge picks him, and I'm confident he knows better than us. 

[jmono84]

Perez had a very poor game, he looks so slow and some of his passes were wayward, I remember one pass to Maddison where he is about 5-10 yards and and he’s blasted it at him hip height and Maddison has had to flick his leg up to get anything on it.

 

Ricardo had a poor game by his standards but he was way more of a threat on the wing than Perez was.

 

I thought he could have played a role centrally and maybe still can in the in behind striker role but he should not be starting games on the RW or as a CF. God knows what BR sees in him in those roles.

[FoxFromCoalville]

Kasper / JJ / Hamza 7

Others 6

Ricky P / Perez 5

 

[Sampson]

9 hours ago, Heymister2015 said:

He’s been out for 10 months! People expecting a performance from him are asking way too much. He needs at least another 5/10 games before being judged. Big injury for a top class player 

Of course he has been and of course there are mitigating circumstances. That's obvious.

 

But surely you rate based solely on their performance in that individual game? Otherwise what's the point of these ratings?

[Deeg67]

17 hours ago, Blueman1967 said:

We could do with Under in for Perez, not a great game again

Unless the aim is to score goals, there's no reason to use Under.

[Scanchez]

15 hours ago, bovril said:

Was Perez that bad. Didn't sound it from the radio. 

He wasn't great but he was no worse than most of the others.

People want seem to want to pick him out.