TeamRocket Posted 3 March 2023 Posted 3 March 2023 2 hours ago, Vazman said: Top's message, going into this match against Southampton should be simple, Win, or your gone, surely he has to be at that stage with him, he must know he is under performing, with what he has got, players, facilities etc, and the kings ransom of a wage. Think that should be for every game until the end 2
Popular Post kingkisnorbo Posted 3 March 2023 Popular Post Posted 3 March 2023 Watched back the Blackburn highlights again. The persistence with playing out from the back despite knowing full well that he doesn’t have the personnel to do so is so ill judged. The obsession with playing out from the back in nauseating at times. 7 1
sacreblueits442 Posted 3 March 2023 Posted 3 March 2023 3 hours ago, winteriscoming said: Readily available managers from Europe. Marcelino Gattuso Farve Hutter Gallardo Bordalas Bosz Villas Boas I know Gallardo isn’t from Europe but any of the above would get more out of this team than Rodgers. That’s what frustrates me more than anything. Add Slot, Fischer, Glasner, Genesio and Svensson in jobs and there’s plenty out there to look at. ...you tell this to the crowd at the games, you will most likely find they have never heard of any of them!!!
Smudge Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 1 hour ago, browniefox said: Like staying loyal to your wife after she's been caught sucking your mates knob at the same time as having your boss take a shit on her chest. Wow, what did you say? That's awful /
Popular Post Tom12345 Posted 4 March 2023 Popular Post Posted 4 March 2023 On 01/03/2023 at 16:33, Chelmofox said: Villa and Spuds were two good recent wins that i thought we could kick on from. I actually think Rodgers tried to fix the 'problems' from those games which in turn has nullified the directness we showed. This. We bounced because we had players not “Rodgered” yet. Some training sessions thereafter, with Rodgers wanting to “fix” the “problems” as he wants more “control” in the “modern” game, they have regressed, already. 4 3 2
FoxyLeon Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 3 hours ago, kingkisnorbo said: Watched back the Blackburn highlights again. The persistence with playing out from the back despite knowing full well that he doesn’t have the personnel to do so is so ill judged. The obsession with playing out from the back in nauseating at times. He bought those players, to play that style, that's the bigger problem. 1
winteriscoming Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 6 hours ago, sacreblueits442 said: ...you tell this to the crowd at the games, you will most likely find they have never heard of any of them!!! The worst thing is I doubt our board would of heard of any of them. 1
shade Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 8 hours ago, kingkisnorbo said: Watched back the Blackburn highlights again. The persistence with playing out from the back despite knowing full well that he doesn’t have the personnel to do so is so ill judged. The obsession with playing out from the back in nauseating at times. this has always been my problem with b-ren, he's an ideologue, he fancies himself as a professorial academic, and he will sacrifice everything, including results, on the altar of his own ego. 1
Aus Fox Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 5 hours ago, FoxyLeon said: He bought those players, to play that style, that's the bigger problem. Don’t let the fact he only bought one of the back 4 get in the way of a good story.
LCFCJohn Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Aus Fox said: Don’t let the fact he only bought one of the back 4 get in the way of a good story. Talk about mental gymnastics Ricardo - is the most talented ‘footballer’ we have amongst our defensive players. Faes - is obviously the one you are referring to Thomas - wasn’t signed at all as a youth prospect but brought through by Rodgers and has been playing his entire professional career to date under him so saying his wasn’t signed by him is not really the claim you think it is! Amartey - yep fair enough. But why is he still playing him? Edited 4 March 2023 by LCFCJohn
Vazman Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 9 hours ago, kingkisnorbo said: Watched back the Blackburn highlights again. The persistence with playing out from the back despite knowing full well that he doesn’t have the personnel to do so is so ill judged. The obsession with playing out from the back in nauseating at times. Fair play to you, for watching that crap again, and trying to make sense of it, I never want to see anything from that match or the Arsenal game ever again, the problem is, it isn't isolated either, so many matches I dont want to see ever again, this season quite telling really. 1
Aus Fox Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 10 minutes ago, LCFCJohn said: Talk about mental gymnastics Ricardo - is the most talented ‘footballer’ we have amongst our defensive players. Faes - is obviously the one you are referring to Thomas - wasn’t signed at all as a youth prospect but brought through by Rodgers and has been playing his entire professional career to date under him so saying his wasn’t signed by him is not really the claim you think it is! Amartey - yep fair enough. But why is he still playing him? Not really mental gymnastics, the quote was ‘he’s bought those players, to play that style, that’s the bigger concern’ - which like most of the guff on this page is just factually incorrect. There is a lot to be unhappy about with BR at the moment, but so much people are getting worked up about is completely made up. I think this is one of the main reasons FoxesTalk appears to be at a disconnect with the thinking of supporters that don’t go on here.
LCFCJohn Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 8 minutes ago, Aus Fox said: Not really mental gymnastics, the quote was ‘he’s bought those players, to play that style, that’s the bigger concern’ - which like most of the guff on this page is just factually incorrect. There is a lot to be unhappy about with BR at the moment, but so much people are getting worked up about is completely made up. I think this is one of the main reasons FoxesTalk appears to be at a disconnect with the thinking of supporters that don’t go on here. Maybe factually correct though as I say, at best really it’s 2 and 2 with Thomas. Four years on though it’s his team in his image and his responsibility. If Amartey and Thomas are seemingly not capable of playing out from the back, why persist with that as the plan? Look I get playing them as they are part of the squad and cup rotation etc. But have a plan B, these errors with these players happen time and time again and nothing change. I thought Blackburn looked much more comfortable playing out from the back than we did but that could have been because our attacking press was non existent so they had all the time in the world…. 2
Nalis Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 7 hours ago, Tom12345 said: This. We bounced because we had players not “Rodgered” yet. Some training sessions thereafter, with Rodgers wanting to “fix” the “problems” as he wants more “control” in the “modern” game, they have regressed, already. So when we win its down to the players but when we lose its down to Rodgers?
Wasyls Pec Deck Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 9 hours ago, kingkisnorbo said: Watched back the Blackburn highlights again. The persistence with playing out from the back despite knowing full well that he doesn’t have the personnel to do so is so ill judged. The obsession with playing out from the back in nauseating at times. Why punish yourself my friend?
jet64 Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 The season we won the league I cashed out my 5000/1 bet after Jon Moss sent off Vardy. It dawned on me that the title could be taken out of our hands through no fault of our own and dodgy decisions could scupper the lot despite playing out of our skins. I have that feeling again with BR in charge; We could have the best squad in the world but he would still play the wrong team or tactics etc and throw away valuable points that should easily be in the bag Here’s hoping he gets it right in the run-in! 1
Bob Farley Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 Potter will be available soon, would take him for sure.
Koke Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 32 minutes ago, Bob Farley said: Potter will be available soon, would take him for sure. Absolutely 💯 percent would take him. He has short comings, they don't call him xGraham Potter for no reason. But I still rate him as a coach. Chelsea are a shambolic club.
st albans fox Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 10 hours ago, kingkisnorbo said: Watched back the Blackburn highlights again. The persistence with playing out from the back despite knowing full well that he doesn’t have the personnel to do so is so ill judged. The obsession with playing out from the back in nauseating at times. It’s the fact that we were so arrogant to believe that we didn’t need to mix it up because they are a championship club - in the PL we do sometimes play it long (although it irks the coach when we do) but iverson was never going to go off script in the first half whilst we weren’t behind. we lost on Tuesday because the coach hadn’t got into the players heads that Blackburn were a threat - tbh, it reminded me of the gillingham game in that respect. 1
Chelmofox Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 56 minutes ago, Koke said: Absolutely 💯 percent would take him. He has short comings, they don't call him xGraham Potter for no reason. But I still rate him as a coach. Chelsea are a shambolic club. He has done very little to justify all this praise. His sides don't score goals and this is clearly a managerial short coming of his. I imagine the Chelsea gig has inflated his expected salary too. Much, much better options out there. 1
Manley Farrington-Brown Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 2 hours ago, Nalis said: So when we win its down to the players but when we lose its down to Rodgers? Yes, that's FT in a nutshell!
Corky Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 There was enough booing on Tuesday at several moments to suggest all isn't well outside this forum, too. 1
Corky Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 12 hours ago, Nod.E said: My experience has been that most that are Rodgers in are mostly casual fans. They haven't really been on the journey of the past few years. Not properly. They still see Leicester as the plucky underdogs, the yo-yo team, the overachievers. They haven't fully engaged, so their view of us as a club is the default. They never dared to dream about how we might establish ourselves as regular challengers for top 6. Because we're just Leicester and 'isn't amazing all this success we've been having?' But we're just Leicester. It'll all be over soon and we should be thankful to even be in the Premier League. They'll often patronise you for not enjoying it. That somehow we should be thankful for 60% possession, 0 xG and spineless performance after spineless performance. Because we're only Leicester. IN THE PREMIER LEAGUE, who'd have thought it, eh? They're casual fans. They don't care. The same people will call it inevitable if we do go down and they still won't be Rodgers out because he won us the FA Cup. The like of Lineker projecting this "Leicester back to being Leicester" narrative helps this view as well.
Guest Lcfc82 Posted 4 March 2023 Posted 4 March 2023 7 minutes ago, Corky said: The like of Lineker projecting this "Leicester back to being Leicester" narrative helps this view as well. Lineker really pisses me off when he’s pushing that narrative on MOTD all the time.
Recommended Posts