Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Fox92

Brendan Rodgers

By Fox92, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
Miquel The Work Geordie

Miquel The Work Geordie

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
29 minutes ago, J. James said:

Ok l have a few posts left so I'll leave my usual one..... Again....

 

BRENDAN RODGERS IS STAYING UNTIL THE WORLD CUP AT LEAST.

 

No ifs buts or maybes they wont sack him, he wont leave so stop dreaming and fantasising.

If they were going to sack him he'd be gone already, if he were going to leave ditto.

Here endeth the truth (and us in the EPL)

 

Everyone stop discussing it J. James has spoken  

  • Like 2
  • Haha 10
4everfox

4everfox

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said:

Players probably have today and Monday off so lets all pray its on Tuesday

They shouldn't be getting any days off whilst we are bottom of the league! 

  • Like 3
TMELcfc

TMELcfc

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

I reckon there's a Jon Percy article coming at 10pm that'll crank it up....

Have you posted that strongly worded letter yet? 

  • Like 1
reynard

reynard

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

When do you think the next training session is ?

Do they actually really do any or are the photos just photoshopped?  

Brooksy

Brooksy

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, Bluetintedspecs said:

I seriously don't get how you or anyone can have this train of thought about the board? 

Let's assume they were losing interest or planning to sell, please explain how wanting the team to go down helps them sell it?

More to the point why would they want that considering the countless millions  they've invested into the infrastructure and development of the club?

I truly am open to the reasons justifying  your comment.

Exactly. Makes the decision to keep him all the more baffling. We're only headed one way with him in charge.

  • Like 1
  • Popular Post
Ric Flair

Ric Flair

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
9 minutes ago, Dames said:

Because we are unbelievably skint. To the point that even with the Fofana money we are in a position where we can’t afford to pay Rodgers off. 
 

He will stay until we are deep in a relegation scrap because there is something in the books that has this board scared stiff. 

Doesn't add up, they didn't want to sell Fofana and they rejected low ball bids for Soumare, Praet, Iheanacho, Maddison and Castagne. 

 

I was told we needed to raise £80m this summer but we didn't do and weren't planning on selling Fofana until next summer at the earliest so I don't know what on earth they are up to. Not sacking Brendan isn't to do with money.

  • Like 6
Foxxed

Foxxed

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, ARTY_FOX said:

Is it European sanctions we're in danger of breaching? 

The spending limits only disallow us from competing in Europe. They can’t stop us sacking him.
 

But **** it. I’d take an instant demotion into the Championship—swapping our position with Watford—if only to jettison Brendan Rodgers forever.

ARTY_FOX

ARTY_FOX

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Foxxed said:

The spending limits only disallow us from competing in Europe. They can’t stop us sacking him.
 

But **** it. I’d take an instant demotion into the Championship—swapping our position with Watford—if only to jettison Brendan Rodgers forever.

So if we breach them we just get banned from Europe for a year or so? When we won't be playing there anyway as it is? 

 

Apologies as I'm sure this will have been gone over a thousand times on here but I've just not looked. 

Edited by ARTY_FOX
  • Like 1
Dames

Dames

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Doesn't add up, they didn't want to sell Fofana and they rejected low ball bids for Soumare, Praet, Iheanacho, Maddison and Castagne. 

 

I was told we needed to raise £80m this summer but we didn't do and weren't planning on selling Fofana until next summer at the earliest so I don't know what on earth they are up to. Not sacking Brendan isn't to do with money.

Its the only explanation I can think of that rules out both incompetence and negligence. We must have hit some sort of bottle neck with the finances. 

ARM1968

ARM1968

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jakemoore said:

In our opinion, yes. But we don’t matter.

In the opinion of many, not just here, and we do matter. There appears to be a single person it hasn’t dawned on. One!  Let that sink in. 

Ric Flair

Ric Flair

Posted
Posted
Just now, Dames said:

Its the only explanation I can think of that rules out both incompetence and negligence. We must have hit some sort of bottle neck with the finances. 

It's so so strange, I thought it was because they no longer trusted him and wanted to force him out but sadly that's probably a pipe dream. Regardless, he is going in the not so distant future, every additional game they fail to act is hugely risky and heads will roll if they get this wrong.

  • Popular Post
Matt

Matt

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)

It's the hope that kills you.

 

I've resigned myself to nothing happening but it doesn't stop me refreshing Twitter searching for any glimmer and hoping. :cry: 

 

Edited by Matt
  • Like 5
LCFCJohn

LCFCJohn

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Doesn't add up, they didn't want to sell Fofana and they rejected low ball bids for Soumare, Praet, Iheanacho, Maddison and Castagne. 

 

I was told we needed to raise £80m this summer but we didn't do and weren't planning on selling Fofana until next summer at the earliest so I don't know what on earth they are up to. Not sacking Brendan isn't to do with money.

I’d agree with this. If it is money related, more of a principle of paying him than physically not being able to? If that was the case, surely the game of chicken is going too far now….

  • Like 2
TMELcfc

TMELcfc

Posted
Posted

We will know tomorrow… but club announcing it but there will be stories written if he’s gone. If there’s nothing then he’s here for good and we are going down 

JimmyC74

JimmyC74

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

It's so so strange, I thought it was because they no longer trusted him and wanted to force him out but sadly that's probably a pipe dream. Regardless, he is going in the not so distant future, every additional game they fail to act is hugely risky and heads will roll if they get this wrong.

Rolling the dice big time leaving him in place for Forest. 
 

 

  • Like 1
J. James

J. James

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Miquel The Work Geordie said:

 

Everyone stop discussing it J. James has spoken  

Yeah fair point bud, l just get so frustrated seeing all the "he's getting sacked if"  etc. etc. And fellow diehard, lifelong city fans building up their hopes only to be dashed... Again.

Just horrible to watch something you love being dismantled and be powerless.

 

TeaMen Tom

TeaMen Tom

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, JonnyBoy said:

He’s not going is he 

I logged on today expecting to read about his sacking. Hopefully it's being negotiated and gets announced on Monday. Keeping him now means the board doesn't mind relegation - and that message sifts through the entire organization so it's likely to be self-fulfilling.

FoxFossil

FoxFossil

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, reynard said:

Do they actually really do any or are the photos just photoshopped?  

Thought the videos were in slowmo, turns out they've been speeded.up.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...