Wasyls Pec Deck Posted 8 July 2021 Posted 8 July 2021 I made this thread a week or so ago and it got deleted I think…
JamesfromlondonLCFC Posted 8 July 2021 Posted 8 July 2021 22 minutes ago, Wasyls Pec Deck said: I made this thread a week or so ago and it got deleted I think… a true foxestalk conspiracy 2
scinnell Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 6 hours ago, shen said: He did a fair bit more than score the free kick. He has high natural ability but there are rightly question marks over his physicality. He seems very similar to Maddison to me, minus the arrogance. Good free kick taker, great vision and has quick feet, but lacking overall pace and strength. Is that worth 40 million? I don't know why people are having this conversation when we need a RW anyway.
Deeg67 Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 2 minutes ago, scinnell said: Is that worth 40 million? I don't know why people are having this conversation when we need a RW anyway. I must have missed the part where someone quoted $40 million for Damsgaard. He'll never go for that much. I get the concerns over his ability to adapt to the pace and physicality of the PL, and the question of need and best allocation of limited financial resources is a valid one. But strictly on his own terms this kid has something special - you can see it watching him. A tremendous understanding of the game and vision for such a young player.
Vardinio'sCat Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 Not really physical so might struggle in the PL, although you could say our current options at no10 suffer from the same problem.
Deeg67 Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 (edited) He's got something of a young Sigurdson to him. A guy who may struggle to influence the game for stretches but can produce magic out of nothing. Edited 9 July 2021 by Deeg67 1
dbtcity Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 We were linked with him in January weren’t we so I don’t get where this signing players based off a major tournament has come from 🤷🏼♂️
The_77 Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 11 hours ago, Paddy. said: Damsgaard has the rare quality of looking like a 10 year old and a 51 year old at the same time. On that basis, it's a yes from me. I said the same exact thing to the people I was watching the semifinal with. 😂 1
egg_fried_rice Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 He's the absolute spit of Shane from The Shield 2
FoxesWalk Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2021/07/08/spurs-mikkel-damsgaard/ linked again, £30m
Marshall Cockney Fox Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 I think Rogers wants pace on the right wing as a priority. This lad seems an odd fit unless we are shifting either Madders or Perez to another club.
Muzzy_Larsson Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 7 minutes ago, FoxesWalk said: https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2021/07/08/spurs-mikkel-damsgaard/ linked again, £30m I like him but this is quite pricey. Sort of player I could imagine Rodgers really working wonders with though and taking his game to the next level.
Muzzy_Larsson Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 1 minute ago, Marshall Cockney Fox said: I think Rogers wants pace on the right wing as a priority. This lad seems an odd fit unless we are shifting either Madders or Perez to another club. Agree right wing is the priority but in an ideal world something new is also needed in that 10 type position as Maddison picks up a lot of injuries and Perez is garbage.
coolhandfox Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 4 hours ago, dbtcity said: We were linked with him in January weren’t we so I don’t get where this signing players based off a major tournament has come from 🤷🏼♂️ The issue is rather than playing a realistic price, you pay massively over the odds. His club paid 6m for him last summer, he's had a very average season. After a couple of decent games at the Euros, people are talking about 30m. 2 1
Ric Flair Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 25 minutes ago, Lako42 said: Never buy off the back of a good tournament I prefer to buy off the back of a bad tournament. Let's get Dan James in. 2
Babylon Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 26 minutes ago, Lako42 said: Never buy off the back of a good tournament We were linked before the tournament though.
Guest Chocolate Teapot Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 1 minute ago, Ric Flair said: I prefer to buy off the back of a bad tournament. Let's get Dan James in. He had a good tournament but he does have a bad back.
Ric Flair Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 1 minute ago, Chocolate Teapot said: He had a good tournament but he does have a bad back. Haha I was trying to think of someone who had had a bad tournament. Cengiz Ünder
mozartfox Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 41 minutes ago, Lako42 said: Never buy off the back of a good tournament Except the Audi Cup.
MPH Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 18 hours ago, Dan LCFC said: Buying after a good tournament is a classic error teams have made many a time. It's just slightly annoying in this instance as I'm sure someone had said we'd been looking at him before this. There'll be no value in it at all now. If we have been tracking him for some time, ( which we usually do) his performances at the tournament should be irrelevant.
Costello Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 If we were looking at him before the tournament, then we'd have had no view on whether it was going to be bad or good, so we're in the clear then ?
coolhandfox Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 51 minutes ago, MPH said: If we have been tracking him for some time, ( which we usually do) his performances at the tournament should be irrelevant. Its relevant to the price........... 3
Gravel Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 1 hour ago, Ric Flair said: I prefer to buy off the back of a bad tournament. Let's get Dan James in. Announce Mbappe! 2
MPH Posted 9 July 2021 Posted 9 July 2021 1 hour ago, coolhandfox said: Its relevant to the price........... Yes, but we wanted him before the tournament was my point.
Recommended Posts