Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Finnegan said:

 

He's near point blank on front of the keeper. I'd be pretty furious if that wasn't flagged off if it was the other way around tbh. 

From where the ball comes from. He's not in the direct eye line. Surely you can see that? 

Posted

Are they any different to the Norwich goal which was ruled out against us? Sounds like Barnes didn't need to give the ref a decision to make...twice.

  • Like 2
Guest Col city fan
Posted

However daft Barnes is to allow VAR to fook us up, the games gone to shit

No-one is telling me this fookin nonsense is making football better to watch 

Posted
Just now, drumbeat said:

Whatever the outcome, we've played a helluva lot better 2nd half. With spirit, passion and belief. Most of the 1st half was a sh*t shower.

Sadly Brendan will revert to his conservative selections. 

Posted

It’s a bullshit rule. Not in the direct line of the ball, keeper can see what’s going on yet he’s impeding the keeper?

 

Fvck off lol 

Posted (edited)
Just now, browniefox said:

It has to be asked. 

Will it be investigated? Can it be? 

by who? 

 

it can't be investigated because the people running the league are the same people employing the referees? 

Edited by whoareyaaa
Posted
Just now, StanSP said:

From where the ball comes from. He's not in the direct eye line. Surely you can see that? 

 

I understand what you're saying but he's close enough to be literally in the keeper's personal space. They're more of less touching each other. Barnes' hand has literally just got off him. How could you possibly argue he's not interfering with play? 

Posted

I honestly don't even think I can be arsed with footie for a while if the rules are just going to bend on a whim like that. There's someone who isn't a fan of us that's for certain 🤣🤣bent as **** 

Posted
1 minute ago, Frost said:

Are they any different to the Norwich goal which was ruled out against us? Sounds like Barnes didn't need to give the ref a decision to make...twice.

Rubbish he wasn't even in front of the keepr6for the second one

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...