Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said:

Fishy Rishi. The first person to become PM despite having a police caution?

What was that for?

 

I know he got a FPN for being in the birthday cake room I wasn't aware of a caution?

Posted

Right, time to draw a line in the sand. 
 

If like to now think we’ll get some intelligent discussion between Sunak and Starmer and less of the stupid politics we’ve had from the likes of Johnson, Corbyn, Truss, May etc! 
 

Finally, we might get ourselves up to a point where we look at least semi competent and know what we’re talking about in front of the worlds’.

Posted

Good news - he is polar opposites to Truss in terms of intelligence and competence. Got a lot of work to do to try and shrink the gap at the polls.

Posted
31 minutes ago, EnderbyFox said:

190 out of touch MP's deciding the leader of the country. 

 

Warra mandate 

How do you suggest it was done? Let me guess, general election.

Posted

I want a general election but I want sensible policies more. If Sunak, in spite of his wealth and opinions, can improve things for everyone then I have hope. We've not actually had a working, proper government for the best part of a year. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Tommy G said:

How do you suggest it was done? Let me guess, general election.

 

Well, yes. How else?

 

Why should we keep recycling through Tory prime ministers when it's clear what is on offer is completely different to what people voted for in 2019?

  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, FoyleFox said:

Hopefully, that's the end of this $hit$how and the Gov actually focus on sorting out the economy and establishing stability.

Why break the habit of a lifetime?

Posted
3 hours ago, Daggers said:

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say Penny has probably secured the @Jattdogg vote.

 

image.jpeg.e9e48069ab40764d7c69edc42cdbd9a8.jpeg

There'll always be a place for her in MY cabinet, which admittedly makes no sense whatsoever but I think communicates the intended sentiment

  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)

The NI rise he implemented, which was then scrapped, is surely about to re-implementen then?  Not an opinion on the rise, just the state of the circles this lot are going in.

Edited by Zear0
Posted
10 minutes ago, EnderbyFox said:

 

Well, yes. How else?

 

Why should we keep recycling through Tory prime ministers when it's clear what is on offer is completely different to what people voted for in 2019?

Why on earth would the tories call for a GE? Have we seen any ideas from Starmer or just his usual sniping at PMQ's? Between 2019 and now we have had a pandemic and a war, most parties manifestos would change in this period irregardless if you are left or right. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Zear0 said:

The NI rise he implemented, which was then scrapped, is surely about to re-implementen then?  Not an opinion on the rise, just the state of the circles this lot are going in.

I hope not. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

The intended sentiment being you've got lower standards than The Singh?

Au contraire, that's a fine figure of a woman, to the extent I can cheerily overlook that her eyes are different sizes

  • Haha 3
Posted
8 minutes ago, Tommy G said:

Why on earth would the tories call for a GE? Have we seen any ideas from Starmer or just his usual sniping at PMQ's? Between 2019 and now we have had a pandemic and a war, most parties manifestos would change in this period irregardless if you are left or right. 

If a reasonably localised low-intensity (by comparison) European conflict and a pandemic that, while devastating, is nothing compared to what other diseases could do, causes any government, left or right, to drop the ball in the way the Tories have in the UK, then it's clear they're not ready for the much bigger challenges that may well lie ahead and therefore aren't fit for government anyway.

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Finnaldo said:


https://www.nationalworld.com/news/politics/labour-every-policy-announced-party-conference-keir-starmer-pledged-3860789?amp
 


We’ve not had a war have we though? We’ve sent material support. In answer to your point, the Tories have cycled through two PMs who have shown no idea how to even limit the damage and even contributed to it, is it surprise that a good slice of the public don’t trust the third?

I know full well we haven't had a war - my point is the sideshow and impact the war has had on our economy, inflation, supply chains etc etc. These are material impacts on our economy from no fault of our own.

Edited by Tommy G
Posted
2 minutes ago, leicsmac said:

If a reasonably localised low-intensity (by comparison) European conflict and a pandemic that, while devastating, is nothing compared to what other diseases could do, causes any government, left or right, to drop the ball in the way the Tories have in the UK, then it's clear they're not ready for the much bigger challenges that may well lie ahead and therefore aren't fit for government anyway.

If you think the Ukraine vs Russian war is low intensity and localised you clearly don't understand the material impact it has had on ours and other major G7 economies around the world. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...