StanSP Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 Surely it's interference? Walton thinks he doesn't? The ball is literally played to him and he runs towards it
Tommy Fresh Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 That's off, just make it up as they go along 1
Arkie Bennett Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 The offside rule is fvcked, and officials can favour certain teams as they wish.
Benji Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 Absolutely no way. That’s offside. He faints to shoot!
walkerleeds Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 Obviously interfering with play. Another laughable decision. 2
spacemunky Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 13 minutes ago, Jattdogg said: Go back to sleep mate its too feckin cold out to do anything including watching the footy in a heated home that early lol. It's just habit for me to get up for the 7:30 match, no matter who's playing. I'm sure I'll drift off during the next match 2
Tommy Fresh Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 Just now, StanSP said: Surely it's interference? Walton thinks he doesn't? The ball is literally played to him and he runs towards it Mental isn't it, Akanji easily covers off Fernandes if he isn't tracking Rashford 2
Guest Lcfc82 Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 If the rules now mean that’s onside they need changing back again. Absolute nonsense
RowlattsFox Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 (edited) Joke of a rule. He interveres with the defender 100% Edited 14 January 2023 by RowlattsFox 1
Super_horns Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 This one counts but have to say maybe a bit lucky Rashford didn’t touch the ball. EDIT: Now he scores.
fazzyfox Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 For me Rashfords run affects the positioning of Akanji. Ok Akanji isn’t tight on him but he’s wary of him and doesn’t commit to going over to deal with Rat face. 2
Corky Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 He ran towards the ball, how was he not interfereing? 2
Arkie Bennett Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 They may as well not bother checking for offside when certain teams score. 1
Guest Lcfc82 Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 1 minute ago, Corky said: He ran towards the ball, how was he not interfereing? Moved towards it and basically stood with it at his feet
Brooksy Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 I don't like Man City but they've been fcuked over here. 1
David Hankey Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 Not interfering, you are either offside or not. Why is a simple situation made difficult?
Matt Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 72% possession, 0 Shots on target midweek. 70% possession, 1 Shot on target today. (Albeit they scored from it) We live in world where this is lauded and people aspire to play in such a way. The games gone.
Chelmofox Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 Just now, Corky said: He ran towards the ball, how was he not interfereing? Said the law was changed to cover it only being offside if you touch the ball. So you can be off and hold off a defender and it’s fine as long as you don’t touch the ball. Needs changing.
Diffco Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 How is that Fernandes goal any different from when on offside player is in the way of the ball and keeper when shot? 1
Corky Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 2 minutes ago, Lcfc82 said: Moved towards it and basically stood with it at his feet Yeah. If he'd stood still and let the ball through then fair enough but he got involved in the play. 1
AKCJ Posted 14 January 2023 Posted 14 January 2023 Man City haven't got a thing from this referee today.
Recommended Posts