Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
25 minutes ago, NFPOUT said:

what's that old saying about not changing a winning side ?  weren't it 5-1 last week, crazy selection but just what we expect !

Last 2 games..So no relevant saying..!!

Posted
2 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

I’d play him next time against his old club Southampton along side Wes

I just think in a 3 he can move the ball forward without leaving space at the back, it could work for him in a 3

Posted
5 minutes ago, splinterdream said:

I'd have played Vestegaard tonight if we're playing a 3, his distribution could have been a benefit to us

and his defending a benefit for Chelsea.

Posted
30 minutes ago, NFPOUT said:

what's that old saying about not changing a winning side ?  weren't it 5-1 last week, crazy selection but just what we expect !

This is the problem. 

 

Right lads, we are going to change it up today.. 

Maths Board High Resolution Stock Photography and Images - Alamy

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Stadt said:

Sticking him at LWB where he’s repeatedly struggled, away to Chelsea after he’s been out the side for a while is unfair. 
 

He can adapt and improve, of course, but exposing him isn’t really the way to do it. 

Adversity can be a good teacher.

 

I'm sure if you ask Luke if he rather be on the bench or playing WB, he would choose playing WB.

 

 

Edited by coolhandfox
Posted
1 minute ago, Sharpe's Fox said:

and his defending a benefit for Chelsea.

Our defense has been awful, vestegaard will have something to prove, I don't think his defending can be any worse than our usual defending, Amartey hasn't exactly been brilliant and cags is now not gonna get to play for us again, it would be worth trying 

Posted
1 minute ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Are these on the beach as well or do they have anything to play for realistically?

3rd or 4th is all they have to play for.

Posted
18 minutes ago, FoxesCJ30 said:

Am I remembering wrong, but I can't remember going 5 at the back to match the opposition working often. Prediction we change the formation at half time. Nevertheless we have rewritten the script many times so let's get those three points to go 8th. 🦊🦊

we can't play that way its been proven over and over !

 

 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said:

This is the problem. 

 

Right lads, we are going to change it up today.. 

Maths Board High Resolution Stock Photography and Images - Alamy

Why are there brackets around the 3x to the power of 5.

 

Also P=(12q-3pq)/q can be simplified ie

 

P=12-3p

4p=12

p=3

 

to find q, rearrange the equation by making q the subject. However since q is simply a multiplier to start with q can be anything (except 0) unless someone can prove that dividing 0 by 0 equals 1. But you cant.

Edited by sishades
  • Haha 1
Posted

All the streams I'm looking at the moment are very laggy, so any PM with a decent one would be amazing please. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

 

I've noticed this before at home but then they end up starting as a 5 anyway.

 

 

 

Anyone for a stream - type in football sportek in Google...

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...