Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Newcastle trying to lowball because they haven't sorted their own money out from player sales. 

 

Longer we hold out for a reasonable fee the better. Hopefully we don't cave in on the £25....

Posted
2 hours ago, TommyK said:

Yes, that I totally agree with. Absolutely shambles that him AND Rodgers should accept total responsibility for. 

 

Do you think Rudkin would be happy that he turned down offers for Cags to have him sit on the bench all season? Of course not. But if the manager is saying he wants to keep a player then what do you do? 

 

Rodgers is history. Rudkin unfortunately not. The current mess is still in intensive care. Hopefully, we recover and rise up again this season.

Posted
23 minutes ago, hackneyfox said:

He’s just explained to you why we lost them for nothing, can’t force a player to leave, can’t force a player to sign a new contract. We played one of them, we dropped the other. What else exactly is a manger or DOF meant to do?

Not sure about the ‘Manger’ , but the DoF find a new vocation.

Posted

I'm in the North East at the moment. 

 

If I see Harvey in a Greggs , I'll buy him a steak bake and tell him to hold off signing anything until a decent offer comes in👍

Posted
21 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Newcastle trying to lowball because they haven't sorted their own money out from player sales. 

 

Longer we hold out for a reasonable fee the better. Hopefully we don't cave in on the £25....

no way we cave for £25mil, suspect it will get rejected straight the way

 

£32-ish mil with £5mil add ons will do it i suspect

Posted
1 minute ago, Costock_Fox said:

That would be woeful business on our part.

You’re probably right. 
 

We’ve been allegedly wanting £60m last season. That pretty much gets cut straight in half thanks to relegation.  

Posted
1 minute ago, Bert said:

You’re probably right. 
 

We’ve been allegedly wanting £60m last season. That pretty much gets cut straight in half thanks to relegation.  

Can’t be less than £40m unless, even then I’d be shocked if it doesn’t get half of the league circling around him.

Posted
1 minute ago, weller54 said:

Out of our control.. 

Thanks to the horrible goblin!!! 

Not completely out of our control, as above less than £40m is horrible business.

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said:

Not completely out of our control, as above less than £40m is horrible business.

The right price is. 

If we were still in the PL we'd get 50m..

25/30m will be what we'll achieve now. 

Posted
23 hours ago, urban.spaceman said:

Categorically untrue.

 

See below:

 

 

Ok I didn’t realise that but you’re saying now ‘side note’ the rule was scrapped in 2019? So what’s holding teams back now?

 

Are you saying the club wanted to sign multiple players on 250k a week but weren’t allowed? Cos to be honest I’m pretty glad that didn’t happen or we’d be even more ****ed than we are now 

Posted

Did i miss the lifting of the rule that meant you couldn't talk to players or their representatives before the club had accepted an offer? Literally every transfer now is the other way round. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Gamble92 said:

Did i miss the lifting of the rule that meant you couldn't talk to players or their representatives before the club had accepted an offer? Literally every transfer now is the other way round. 

What do you think agents are for?

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, StanSP said:

Newcastle trying to lowball because they haven't sorted their own money out from player sales. 

 

Longer we hold out for a reasonable fee the better. Hopefully we don't cave in on the £25....

Plus allows West Ham to come in with that Declan Rice money, creates a bidding war. 

Posted

£25mil would be a complete disgrace. I can't believe it's that low, even for us.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Dan LCFC said:

£25mil would be a complete disgrace. I can't believe it's that low, even for us.

Agreed. Even if it was 25 now plus add ons I wouldn’t be keen unless easily achievable e.g. 10-15 million after 25 games / 15 goals whichever came soonest. 
 

You would have thought Villa and West Ham would be in our ear if 25m was the price.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...