Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

I genuinely wouldn’t be surprised if Iheanacho ends up as a replacement for Mitrovic if he moves to Saudi, in fact given link to Castagne might be a chance of a £25m+ double deal 

And then might as well take Ndidi for another £10m as back up or replacement for Pallinha. £35m. Sorted

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Fox85 said:

The best deal for Leicester City is to keep Kel in order to be promoted again.

 

Because business is business promotion is worth more than a poxy 10 -15 million.

 

Or are you one of those that would prefer to stay in the championship for years to come? Just out of curiosity 

 

 

Well we could just as easily get promoted without Iheanacho and just as easily not get promoted with him.

 

There are no guarantees.

 

Would anyone be surprised to see Iheanacho behind Vardy and Daka as our lone striker?

 

Why turn down a good fee for Iheanacho if he's just going to be on the bench which he probably will be?

Posted

I'd be over the moon to see the below first game of the season. 
It's got a mobile defence that can pass and bring it out. It's got triangles all over the pitch and can get Ricardo and Kristiansen up the pitch and it should mean we have 3 in the box often when the ball comes in.

Before we even sign anyone you've got Thomas, Souttar, Daka as decent options with 3 or 4 needed to give us flexibility. We need another midfielder, winger and striker now with some of the Barnes, Castagnes, Faes, Soumare, Praet money that might come in

 

Hermansen

Justin Coady Doyle 

Ricardo Ndidi Kristiansen

Winks KDH
Iheanacho

Vardy

 

  • Like 4
Posted
4 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Swap Ndidi for Winks and then get a attacking midfielder alongside KDH and it would be very strong for the Championship.

could argue they will put in Souttar or another rather than Justin - meaning that we can have 2 fullbacks on the bench and can effect some sort of rotation (given fitness history) 

the big unknowns are: 

will Faes, Vestergaard, Castagne go? My view: all three will go

who will we lose out of Ndidi, Soumare, Praet Choudhury (we need to keep 2 you'd have thought as we can't lose all of them!)? My view: Keep Ndidi, Praet - lose Soumare, Choudhury - they can't play Pep - ball

which 1 of Daka / Iheanacho will stay. We need at least 3 strikers from day 1 given Vardy's age? My view: Keep Iheanacho til Jan at least (and ransom a Prem club then if needs be),  buy Piroe, loan Daka

who comes in to replace Maddison/Barnes (60% of our goals and assists)? If we get any of Cairney, Casadei and Diallo i think we can call that an unbelievable close season despite losing so many players. 

 

Squad

Hermansen, Storalrcyk, Smithies

Justin, Ricardo, Coady, Souttar, Doyle, Nelson, Kristiansen, Thomas

Ndidi, Praet, Winks, KDH, Casadei, 

Diallo Albrighton, Maswanhise, Madivadua

Piroe, Vardy, Iheanacho

 

That squad has to gel and concede no goals from the off or we will be drawing a lot of games due to lack of threat. We can't be conceding often as i can see us huffing and puffing in a lot of games and having to win 1-0 when attacking is shit. I could be wrong and we could keep all three strikers, add Diallo and be flying for goals from all over the team !

Posted
1 hour ago, Verumex said:

I didn't say he was. I said that option B was for Piroe or a striker at a similar level to Piroe.

Which would be a downgrade on Nacho?

Posted

This is going to be a heavy telling season…and FT is too much concerned of getting rid of some of our better players..

when one goes through the various topics,showing fans selection wishesand seeing the choice of teams

,honestly I could agree with most…but we also have to have quality cover,including some academy wanna-be‘s.  So blindly picking players one selects for out..

I suggest some have a rethink on our needed cover & those fringe players some expect to be part of LCFC .who still seriously want to have their chance and have a go.!!


There will be injuries,some academy players should be given their chance,but we also need some base of our initial squad, to step in,and many will be needed and some will be getting their fair share of gametime.like Praet,Faes,Ndidi,Choudhury.

Sorry has a fan I don’t care too much about the money,there are highly paid recruit management that are paid to sort it out.I don’t want us to blindly throw names in the hat just because what they earn,or had a miserable relegation season..Then if 2-3 injuries even for only a few weeks, we need quality to step in,with the odd academy being given that break.

Posted
3 hours ago, ARM1968 said:

Which would be a downgrade on Nacho?

Which I've already said I agree with...

 

Are you being dense on purpose or are you just not reading my posts? Serious question, not trying to be rude. 

  • Sad 1
Posted
8 hours ago, FosseSpark said:

I'd be over the moon to see the below first game of the season. 
It's got a mobile defence that can pass and bring it out. It's got triangles all over the pitch and can get Ricardo and Kristiansen up the pitch and it should mean we have 3 in the box often when the ball comes in.

Before we even sign anyone you've got Thomas, Souttar, Daka as decent options with 3 or 4 needed to give us flexibility. We need another midfielder, winger and striker now with some of the Barnes, Castagnes, Faes, Soumare, Praet money that might come in

 

Hermansen

Justin Coady Doyle 

Ricardo Ndidi Kristiansen

Winks KDH
Iheanacho

Vardy

 

And not a winger in sight…

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

Swap Ndidi for Winks and then get a attacking midfielder alongside KDH and it would be very strong for the Championship.

Imagine that side with Leo Fernandez as the attacking midfielder, shame he's joined Fluminense on loan

Posted
18 hours ago, coolhandfox said:

50% of which came in 2 games (2 goals and 3 assists) Spurs & Villa.
 

Let’s forget the hat trick of chances at Southampton.

 

He’s a decent player in patches, but that’s not good enough, which is reflected in the clubs interested in his services even at a bargain price. 


Daka got 4 goals and 4 assists in 1179 minutes, does he deserve to be in the PL too? 

 

 

So youre willing to write off two of the very few games this past season season that he started but define his season on that one southampton game?

 

Iheanacho's numbers are consistent over his entire career at leicester, it is a fact by now that he is a striker that gets a goal or assist every 130 minutes which is more than good enough to play in the PL.

 

Also yes Daka is a PL quality striker, at a well run club where he gets consistent game time he would do well. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Tommy Fresh said:

Imagine that side with Leo Fernandez as the attacking midfielder, shame he's joined Fluminense on loan

Les Ferdinand was the same......

Posted
13 hours ago, Fox85 said:

The best deal for Leicester City is to keep Kel in order to be promoted again.

 

Because business is business promotion is worth more than a poxy 10 -15 million.

 

Or are you one of those that would prefer to stay in the championship for years to come? Just out of curiosity 

This is the wrong calculation thought isn't it. What's the difference in our chances with and without Iheanacho? Promotion is worth more itself, of course, but how much you attribute to Nacho would be speculative.

 

If we're in the region of £15m fee, and promotion is worth £150m then Nacho would need to improve our chances by more than 10% on his own. (Ballpark figs).

Posted
13 hours ago, FosseSpark said:

I'd be over the moon to see the below first game of the season. 
It's got a mobile defence that can pass and bring it out. It's got triangles all over the pitch and can get Ricardo and Kristiansen up the pitch and it should mean we have 3 in the box often when the ball comes in.

Before we even sign anyone you've got Thomas, Souttar, Daka as decent options with 3 or 4 needed to give us flexibility. We need another midfielder, winger and striker now with some of the Barnes, Castagnes, Faes, Soumare, Praet money that might come in

 

Hermansen

Justin Coady Doyle 

Ricardo Ndidi Kristiansen

Winks KDH
Iheanacho

Vardy

 

Looks very narrow and very defensive to me. I’d only see Vardy and Nacho as attacking…

Posted
13 hours ago, FosseSpark said:

I'd be over the moon to see the below first game of the season. 
It's got a mobile defence that can pass and bring it out. It's got triangles all over the pitch and can get Ricardo and Kristiansen up the pitch and it should mean we have 3 in the box often when the ball comes in.

Before we even sign anyone you've got Thomas, Souttar, Daka as decent options with 3 or 4 needed to give us flexibility. We need another midfielder, winger and striker now with some of the Barnes, Castagnes, Faes, Soumare, Praet money that might come in

 

Hermansen

Justin Coady Doyle 

Ricardo Ndidi Kristiansen

Winks KDH
Iheanacho

Vardy

 

Christ.

 

Ndidi in that role given the way Maresca wants to play...we'd lose more that we'd win!

 

There are strengths to his game, but he's an atrocious footballer.

Posted
8 hours ago, Verumex said:

Which I've already said I agree with...

 

Are you being dense on purpose or are you just not reading my posts? Serious question, not trying to be rude. 

Not sure you made it entirely clear - a little open to interpretation. Seemed like you’d be happy to exchange Nacho for Piroe. 
 

Think I’d rather lose the £8-£10 million on Nacho and get fired back to the Premier League. Wouldn’t be everyone’s view, granted. 

Posted
33 minutes ago, Number 6 said:

This is the wrong calculation thought isn't it. What's the difference in our chances with and without Iheanacho? Promotion is worth more itself, of course, but how much you attribute to Nacho would be speculative.

 

If we're in the region of £15m fee, and promotion is worth £150m then Nacho would need to improve our chances by more than 10% on his own. (Ballpark figs).

Nacho given time will score us the goals to get is promoted.

 

People are litterally mental we have 3 of the best strikers at Leicester in the league.

 

Nacho leading the line will send us up with a better chance of signing somone else who is better than him.

 

So yea 15 million is **** all

Posted
Just now, Fox85 said:

Nacho given time will score us the goals to get is promoted.

 

People are litterally mental we have 3 of the best strikers at Leicester in the league.

 

Nacho leading the line will send us up with a better chance of signing somone else who is better than him.

 

So yea 15 million is **** all

Another opinion is that he won`t. Either opinion is perfectly valid, the reality will need to be based on cold statistical evidence, and I am unconvinced it speaks in Kelechi's favour

 

Can I get a @Finnegan stat attack please Bob?

Posted

I genuinely think this comes down to whether or not he wants to sign a new contract during the season. We can’t afford to let players go on a free next summer.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Fox85 said:

Nacho given time will score us the goals to get is promoted.

 

People are litterally mental we have 3 of the best strikers at Leicester in the league.

 

Nacho leading the line will send us up with a better chance of signing somone else who is better than him.

 

So yea 15 million is **** all

I agree with your sentiments re keep Nacho. However as regards '3 of the best strikers in the league' - I'm not so sure. Vards I feel is hugely on the wane. He shanks efforts that previously would have been meat & drink. Daka alas has hugely regressed in his time under Bodgers. So in short, I'm really not sure where we sit re accomplished strikers. If Nacho goes. I will be anxious with the other 2 being left. Unless someone good arrives. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

Another opinion is that he won`t. Either opinion is perfectly valid, the reality will need to be based on cold statistical evidence, and I am unconvinced it speaks in Kelechi's favour

 

Can I get a @Finnegan stat attack please Bob?

 

I think you'd have to be very jaded and cynical about our squad to not think we've got three of the best strikers in the league here. Any other club in the division would absolutely bite our hands off for Nacho, Daka or Vards. Half the Prem would too. 

 

I think you'd have to be nuts to think Iheanacho wouldn't be perfectly good enough to lead the line for us in the Championship given his hit rate in the Prem. 

 

But we don't look like we're going to need three strikers and we need cash, Nacho is out of contract and seems the most keen to get himself a move so yknow. Ciao. 

  • Like 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Fox85 said:

The best deal for Leicester City is to keep Kel in order to be promoted again.

 

Because business is business promotion is worth more than a poxy 10 -15 million.

 

Or are you one of those that would prefer to stay in the championship for years to come? Just out of curiosity 

If he wants to go we have let him leave there's no point having people here who have had offers knocked back returning to the premier league.

 

100% commitment here or go.

Posted

Just wondering if we are looking through blue tinted glasses too much.

 

If he is that good and available for anything from £8m plus or whatever the reported bargain price is then where is the queue of buyers? 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...