Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don’t really know much about rugby but how is that a red card. I wouldn’t have even said it’s a foul ?

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Izzy said:

Rugby is disappearing up it's own arse with all these checks and new rules.

 

I appreciate player safety is paramount but as causal viewer it all seems a bit OTT.

I’m afraid that they have to follow this head protection ruling because they’re likely to be sued by ever increasing numbers of dementia affected former players. So they need to show the courts/possible inquiry that they’re doing whatever they can 

 

It’s a massive problem for the game  because it’s often a nonsense 

Edited by st albans fox
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, st albans fox said:

I’m afraid that they have to follow this head protection ruling because they’re likely to be sued by ever increasing numbers of dementia affected former players. So they need to show the courts/possible inquiry that they’re doing whatever they can 

That's a fair point but their paranoia is now ruining the game IMO.

Posted

Be an absolute joke if Argentina’s isn’t a red after England’s was. I’d be interested to hear someone a bit more clued up on it all explain why Argies isn’t a red if it doesn’t get upgraded. 

Posted
1 minute ago, David Hankey said:

Indiscipline will lose England the game.

 

All these red cards, is it something to do with Borhwick's style?

Wasn’t an issue for Tigers - so it’s new rules or player stupidity (which certainly counts for Farrell’s recent red)

Posted
1 minute ago, Nalis said:

Curry's was harsh but careless under current rules. Carreras' looks a bit more cynical and unnecessary.

Help me out here mate. What was he supposed to do instead?

 

What exactly did he do wrong?

  • Like 3
Posted

I missed the original incident and have only seen it back once but the challenge was made in equal measure by both players.  There was zero intent to harm the player.  How this isn't seen as an accidental clash of heads is baffling in such a physical sport.  Or are we taking the physicality out of the game now?

  • Like 1
Posted

The Argentinian player not receiving a red illustrates the lottery of the laws

 

it seems that the fact curry drew blood meant he was dismissed - the Argentinian’s offence was way more dangerous to ford’s head than curry’s incident 

  • Like 2
Posted

I'm already losing interest in this WC.

 

A bit like F1, too many rules and regs just complicating the sport.

  • Like 4
Posted
Just now, st albans fox said:

The Argentinian player not receiving a red illustrates the lottery of the laws

 

it seems that the fact curry drew blood meant he was dismissed - the Argentinian’s offence was way more dangerous to ford’s head than curry’s incident 

I think your point about the blood is exactly right. Reacted to the injury rather than the tackle. 

Posted
Just now, Izzy said:

I'm already losing interest in this WC.

 

A bit like F1, too many rules and regs just complicating the sport.

Fully understand the need to improve the safety of head injuries and do what can be done to prevent them. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...