Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Sly

Josh Brownhill (Al Shabab, free transfer)

By Sly, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

AKCJ

AKCJ

Posted
Posted

Not enough upsides to account for the downsides.

 

Would be extremely Leicester to make this happen for a player that will obviously leave us for free having taken £20m in wages with less than 100 games played.

 

  • Like 1
AjcW

AjcW

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

Not enough upsides to account for the downsides.

 

Would be extremely Leicester to make this happen for a player that will obviously leave us for free having taken £20m in wages with less than 100 games played.

 

Is there anyone at all your would like us to sign?

  • Like 2
Muzzy_no7

Muzzy_no7

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

Not enough upsides to account for the downsides.

 

Would be extremely Leicester to make this happen for a player that will obviously leave us for free having taken £20m in wages with less than 100 games played.

 

We gonna pay him 100-125K per week then?

  • Popular Post
baldeagle

baldeagle

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
10 minutes ago, Tuna said:

Just give him what he wants, if we are serious. We're desperate.

And that’s exactly how we’ve got ourselves in the mess we are in with PSR in the first place .  

  • Like 11
RedSoxUK

RedSoxUK

Posted
Posted

Will add that we just sold our 2nd best RB to the PL and our 4th best winger to the favourites Ipswich. This league IS shit and we've got a lot of quality.. rough around the edges and not many goalscorers, but it's obvious where we need improvements.

 

We're 2/3 correct signings away from being close to the top, CM, AM, ST - and ideally a LB if we sell/loan Kristy

 

AKCJ

AKCJ

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, AjcW said:

Is there anyone at all your would like us to sign?

A fullback, a central midfielder, an attacking midfielder and a striker.

 

I wouldn't want any of those players to be older than 26/27 and I wouldn't want to pay any of them 100 grand a week.

  • Thanks 1
AKCJ

AKCJ

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

We gonna pay him 100-125K per week then?

That's what he's rumoured to be wanting. But even then 80k a week for 5 years is the sort of thing you could see Rudkin being happy to offer.

moore_94

moore_94

Posted
Posted

I imagine he is waiting to see if someone like Everton or West Ham who are after centre mids panic on deadline day after struggling to get deals done and throw him a good contract

stevostadium

stevostadium

Posted
Posted

So many people on here with there heads in the sand.

He isnt coming. We certainly wont be offering 29 year olds 3 year contracts on 50K a week.

It looks like the club have learnt  there lesson on that one, thankfully.

 

Dont expect any incomings just 3 or 4 more out the door.

 

Also been told there is something in the Nixon story but the mercury reported its not true, so they must be right! Been shot down enough for suggesting otherwise

Mercury is Click bait at its best.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Scotch

Scotch

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, stevostadium said:

So many people on here with there heads in the sand.

He isnt coming. We certainly wont be offering 29 year olds 3 year contracts on 50K a week.

It looks like the club have learnt  there lesson on that one, thankfully.

 

Dont expect any incomings just 3 or 4 more out the door.

 

Also been told there is something in the Nixon story but the mercury reported its not true, so they must be right! Been shot down enough for suggesting otherwise

Mercury is Click bait at its best.

 

 

What Nixon story?

Pliskin

Pliskin

Posted
Posted

It’s not true. The EFL HAVE to publish any embargo’s imposed… if they’ve done this without following the correct procedures then we can hang them out to dry legally… again. 
 

 

Nixon is a wind up merchant and nothing more. He’s wholly inaccurate and rarely gets anything right. 

  • Like 1
stu

stu

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, stevostadium said:

So many people on here with there heads in the sand.

He isnt coming. We certainly wont be offering 29 year olds 3 year contracts on 50K a week.

It looks like the club have learnt  there lesson on that one, thankfully.

 

Dont expect any incomings just 3 or 4 more out the door.

 

Also been told there is something in the Nixon story but the mercury reported its not true, so they must be right! Been shot down enough for suggesting otherwise

Mercury is Click bait at its best.

 

 

Another been told...

 

What does one have to do to get on the 'been told' WhatsApp group?

  • Like 4
moore_94

moore_94

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, stevostadium said:

Transfer embargo which the thread is now closed as not true apparently:giggle:

Because it would be listed on the EFL website if it was true.

 

It isn’t.

  • Like 2
mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted

Not sure Josh Brownstuff is the type of player we should be signing.  Here is hoping Marti has some irons in the fire before the window closes. Surepy our Recruitment Team have some targets??

Collymore

Collymore

Posted
Posted
Just now, mozartfox said:

Not sure Josh Brownstuff is the type of player we should be signing.  Here is hoping Marti has some irons in the fire before the window closes. Surepy our Recruitment Team have some targets??

What other type of player would you recommend right now? Yes, we need to get back to the model of the past of buying cheap relatively unknowns but that can only happen if you've got a spine and they can be integrated gently. 

 

We are lacking quality in midfield and Brownhill is free and has an unbelievable track record at this level so he's the exact type of player we're after. 

StanSP

StanSP

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, stevostadium said:

yet

Why would there be a wait time for the EFL to announce a transfer embargo? It wouldn't make sense. 

  • Like 1
Scotch

Scotch

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, stevostadium said:

Transfer embargo which the thread is now closed as not true apparently:giggle:

Well, ofcourse it isn't true. The EPL have to announce teams that are under restrictions and they haven't announced we are under any embargo. 

  • Popular Post
Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
9 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

Because it would be listed on the EFL website if it was true.

 

It isn’t.

 

It would also have been announced by all mainstream UK news and sports media with huge big glaring headlines, all over Sky, the BBC, etc.

 

People are just ****ing stupid and will believe anything they see on Facebook.

 

  • Like 5
  • Haha 1
Happy Fox

Happy Fox

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Why would there be a wait time for the EFL to announce a transfer embargo? It wouldn't make sense. 

 

Probably because we are contesting it?

  • Like 1
mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Collymore said:

What other type of player would you recommend right now? Yes, we need to get back to the model of the past of buying cheap relatively unknowns but that can only happen if you've got a spine and they can be integrated gently. 

 

We are lacking quality in midfield and Brownhill is free and has an unbelievable track record at this level so he's the exact type of player we're after. 

We have a scouting network and a Recruitment Team. If their activities are confined to just Josh Brownhill, then they all need firing.  Value for money being ignored with bringing in highly paid stop-gaps has got us in part in this PSR position. 

 

So this question on recommendations should be addressed to the Club - not me.:dunno:

 

 

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...