Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
The Year Of The Fox

Martí Cifuentes

By The Year Of The Fox, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

coolhandfox

coolhandfox

Posted
Posted
Just now, DZ-LCFC said:

talkSPORT understands that Cifuentes stands to earn less at the King Power Stadium than what he was on at QPR.

 

 

I find that very unlikely.

  • Like 1
teblin

teblin

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, coolhandfox said:

I find that very unlikely.

But a massive bonus if he gets us up? But agree seems unlikely 

  • Like 3
Jon the Hat

Jon the Hat

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, l444ry said:

Hope is more confident than mere wishful thinking. 

Hope Powell?  We would certainly make some news as the ex champions who appointed a woman!

  • Like 1
Chelmofox

Chelmofox

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, DZ-LCFC said:

talkSPORT understands that Cifuentes stands to earn less at the King Power Stadium than what he was on at QPR.

 

 

Talksport likely misunderstanding some of the rumours around compensation. 

  • Like 2
Chico1958

Chico1958

Posted
Posted

He's Free ............... If he want's to take up the challenge I'm Happy

 

Just hope he knows he's coming to a Madhouse that's Full of Clowns

 

TO ME CLOWNS AREN'T FUNNY. IN FACT, THEY'RE KIND OF SCARY. 

I'VE WONDERED WHERE THIS STARTED AND I THINK IT GOES BACK TO THE TIME

I WENT TO THE CIRCUS AND A CLOWN KILLED MY CLUB 

 

 

Jon the Hat

Jon the Hat

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

 

This probably benefits us a little to be honest. Whilst I desperately wish we had the operating model of a better club, we're still tinpot enough to expect a manager to do everything.

 

I may be being extremely condescending towards Sandefjord, AaB and Hammarby but I imagine a manager has to be an actual manager at their level.

 

At the end of the day, the most important part for us is how well each of these guys can coach the squad and get a reaction out of them and frankly you might as well flip a coin. Cifuentes' football matches Top's vision more than Rohl's, that's about it. 

 

 I'd probably slightly prefer Rohl but I'd be content with either.

 

That is a fair point actually, we are not Bayern Munich or the German national setup that is for sure.

  • Popular Post
urban.spaceman

urban.spaceman

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
25 minutes ago, DZ-LCFC said:

talkSPORT understands that Cifuentes stands to earn less at the King Power Stadium than what he was on at QPR.

Fewer. 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 6
dooflip

dooflip

Posted
Posted

Really hope he decided to play two really high narrow wingers with a deep striker/false 9 type set up due to our lack of budget. We would be able to fit quite a few of our wingers/technical players in that way. Mavididi or monga down the middle would be sweet.

Bablemikey

Bablemikey

Posted
Posted

On balance I think I'd prefer Rohl, but I could get behind Cifuentes. We are strong enough to be amongst the contenders to go up even with a points deduction. 

Staying up is nigh on impossible given the spending restrictions that promoted clubs have though, thanks to PSR.

HankMarvin

HankMarvin

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Tomo260 said:

He had a poor squad, and was on gardening leave when Burnley dismantled them I believe.

 

He took over Ainsworth who had QPR in an awful position and they finished well. I'm not saying he's perfect but he's definitely more attractive than Wilder and GON

No he was managing

 

“QPR boss Marti Cifuentes made a double substitution at half-time, sending on striker Michael Frey and playmaker Ilias Chair”

 

If you are gonna highlight a Leeds result, then maybe highlight the bad too.

As for he is more attractive proposition than O’Neil, he hasn’t managed in the Prem and it’s a whole another ball game. Just like Kompany found out. 

 

 


 

Edited by HankMarvin
  • Like 1
  • Popular Post
Jobyfox

Jobyfox

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
29 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said:

Fewer. 

No!

 

It’s not expressly stated, but it’s reasonable to assume that “money” was the implied noun in the quoted phrase.

 

Money is an uncountable noun and, therefore, the correct determiner would be “less” 

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 1
  • Popular Post
Lesta Legend

Lesta Legend

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
1 minute ago, Jobyfox said:

No!

 

It’s not expressly stated, but it’s reasonable to assume that “money” was the implied noun in the quoted phrase.

 

Money is an uncountable noun and, therefore, the correct determiner would be “less” 

Nerd

  • Haha 7
Scotch

Scotch

Posted
Posted

I just hope Dufkin and Top are open and honest with him. There is nothing wrong with telling him up front "there won't be much money, you might be able to spend on one or two but for the most part, it will be free transfers and loans."

 

I don't think it will chase him away and everyone knows where they stand. 

mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, coolhandfox said:

I find that very unlikely.

I find it BS too.

Kitchandro

Kitchandro

Posted
Posted

I can’t say this excites me, but it makes me a lot less angry than the idea of O’Neill, Wilder, Martin and Dyche. And that’s purely because I don’t know how good or crap he is.

 

If our club was reliable and thoughtful about hiring managers I would be more optimistic that they’d really done due diligence. But I’m more inclined to believe he’s being hired because he’s cheap and recently managed in the division.

 

Since everyone on here believes we should walk the league with the squad we’ve got, I won’t be expecting a load of excuses for this guy if we struggle.

 

I’m not nearly as confident, but as always I just want to see a manager play positively and bring some enjoyment to watching football, which we haven’t had a commitment to for a long time.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...