Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Sly

IN - James Trafford - January Loan

Recommended Posts

Posted

https://www.teamtalk.com/manchester-city/news-star-could-push-january-loan-leicester-southampton-plot-eye-catching-moves
 

Man City star could ‘push’ for January loan as Leicester, Southampton plot eye-catching moves – sources
 

Manchester City star James Trafford, with caption: Uncertain future 

 

James Trafford is facing an uncertain future at Manchester City despite only re-joining in the summer, and TEAMtalk understands that a January loan is now a realistic possibility, with Southampton and Leicester City interested.

 

The 22-year-old England goalkeeper has fallen down Pep Guardiola’s pecking order since the blockbuster signing of Gianluigi Donnarumma from Paris Saint-Germain.

 

The Italian, widely regarded as one of the world’s elite shot-stoppers, has claimed the number one spot, relegating Trafford to the bench just months after his high-profile move from Burnley in the summer of 2025.
 

With the World Cup looming, questions are mounting over whether the young keeper can secure the regular playing time needed to cement his place in Thomas Tuchel’s England squad.

 

Trafford, who impressed at Burnley with his composure and reflexes, was seen as a long-term investment for City.

 

However, Donnarumma’s arrival has disrupted his trajectory, limiting him to cup competitions like the FA Cup and Carabao Cup. While these matches offer valuable minutes, they fall short of the consistent week-in, week-out action Trafford needs to stay sharp and catch Tuchel’s eye.

 

Sources close to the player suggest he’s acutely aware of the stakes, with England’s goalkeeping hierarchy still fluid and Jordan Pickford consistently good for Everton…

 

A January loan move is now a realistic possibility, with sources indicating Trafford may push for a temporary departure to ensure regular football.

 

Several Premier League and Championship clubs are monitoring the situation, with Southamptonand Leicester touted as potential destinations.

 

However, any loan would require Manchester City to secure a short-term backup goalkeeper to cover Trafford’s absence, given the demands of their multi-competition schedule.

 

Guardiola has praised Trafford’s potential, but the club’s focus on immediate silverware may prioritize Donnarumma’s experience.

 

Trafford’s camp remains optimistic, emphasizing his youth and long-term prospects. At 6’6”, his commanding presence and distribution skills align perfectly with modern goalkeeping demands, making him a strong contender for England’s future.

 

Yet, with the World Cup on the horizon, time is ticking. A loan could be the key to keeping his international dreams alive, but City’s final decision will shape his path. For now, Trafford waits, determined to prove he belongs among the elite.

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

Really can’t see him dropping back into the Championship, someone in the Prem would definitely pick him up if he was available on loan

West Ham ?

 

we can take mads on loan 😄

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

I like Stolarcyzk but an opportunity to get arguably the best young keeper in the country is one we should take. He basically single-handedly promoted Burnley last season.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm not sure how you turn this deal down if its an option. Far better than what we currently have (granted I've never seen the bloke from Betis actually play football)

Posted
24 minutes ago, filbertway said:

Not sure why we're linked, we don't need a keeper and it's not a position crying out for improvement in.

Seems a non-story to me. We've made Jakub no1, and signed two keepers in the last window. For that reason alone this won't happen.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, CornwallFox said:

Man city have properly done him dirty with the donnarumma signing

Probably realised he isn't good enough so signed a proper keeper. 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Tommy G said:

Probably realised he isn't good enough so signed a proper keeper. 

Trafford was never intended to be number one. They were just exercising their clause to buy back Trafford and make a future profit on him as they often do all of their youngsters. 

Posted
39 minutes ago, Tommy G said:

Probably realised he isn't good enough so signed a proper keeper. 

😂😂😂😂😂

 

England number one in waiting. 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Tommy G said:

Probably realised he isn't good enough so signed a proper keeper. 

 

1 hour ago, Aleksz said:

Trafford was never intended to be number one. They were just exercising their clause to buy back Trafford and make a future profit on him as they often do all of their youngsters. 

I think they absolutely intended for him to be number one but then an unexpected opportunity arrived to sign donnarumma. There was zero talk of them looking at keepers until psg dropped him.

  • Like 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, CornwallFox said:

 

I think they absolutely intended for him to be number one but then an unexpected opportunity arrived to sign donnarumma. There was zero talk of them looking at keepers until psg dropped him.

I thought they were linked with Donarumma throughout most of the summer and the move just happened quite late

Posted

There’s no doubt he’d be an upgrade on Jakob.

 

i still feel there’s other positions we need to upgrade on first. Jakob is NOT the problem.

Posted
1 hour ago, Ashley said:

😂😂😂😂😂

 

England number one in waiting. 

 

 

Not doubting he's one for the future - but if you look at Raya or Alisson - they are miles ahead so Man C will naturally want to fill in with an experienced keeper once Ederson left. 

Posted (edited)

Not sure why we'd be interested. Man City paid £27mill for him, we're not going to be able to buy him, so it's only workable as a loan, and why upset the apple cart for a season?

Edited by JimJams
Posted

seems like Agent talk to sniff out a prem loan move, far too expensive for us to do given we have 3 keepers and Jakub has been really good overall 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, MPH said:

There’s no doubt he’d be an upgrade on Jakob.

 

i still feel there’s other positions we need to upgrade on first. Jakob is NOT the problem.

why the fuch would we piss off our no.1 by replacing him with a loan:brendan:

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, AyewJoking said:

why the fuch would we piss off our no.1 by replacing him with a loan:brendan:


 

Rudkin: Hold my beer….

  • Haha 1
Posted

A keeper is the farthest position from need as we have. Jakub is a prem standard, maybe not as good as trafford  but good enough for us when we need every other position other than wing upgrading.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...