Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Stadt said:

He has but at the club he’s been since he was 9, going out on loan at his age to a second completely new environment whilst not an adult yet is a tumultuous time. I think they’ll want a look at him in their own set up first and maybe then loan him out in Jan, when he’ll be about 17 and a half.

AKA: Past it!

Posted

I understand the plan is for him to  join their first team for preseason to asses him fully and go from there- either loan or integrate him into the 1st team squad

Posted
12 hours ago, Samilktray said:

Losing academy lads like this because of where we now found ourselves is crap. Selling the likes of Kante/Mahrez etc is crap but this just feels a bit more gutting to me 

Yep this is a whole new level of worse.

Mahrez still played for us for a number of years.
This is like we groom someone up, and then as soon as they ready, they gone, doesnt feel right at all.

 

The sport needs changing that requires academy players to stay at parent club for X years unless the club forfeits the right.

I just cant really become attached to any youth player, because with our current policy, the ones who are any good will be sold quickly to fund an inflated wage bill.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

we got ripped off there, 10 mill ? what a bargain they got

 

they stick him in the under 19s for a couple years and hell shine and they will either stick him in the 1st team or selll him for 30 mill, either way they win

Edited by Trent Steel
Posted
4 minutes ago, Trent Steel said:

we got ripped off there, 10 mill ? what a bargain they got

 

they stick him in the under 19s for a couple years and hell shine and they will either stick him in the 1st team or selll him for 30 mill, either way they win

To be honest, at least we got a fee.
 

We are losing players at the U14 age group, which is a lot worse. 

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Trent Steel said:

we got ripped off there, 10 mill ? what a bargain they got

 

they stick him in the under 19s for a couple years and hell shine and they will either stick him in the 1st team or selll him for 30 mill, either way they win

Surely we have a sell on fee 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Sly said:

To be honest, at least we got a fee.
 

We are losing players at the U14 age group, which is a lot worse. 

yeah I supppose but surely maybe could of squeezed 15 ? i bet we didnt even haggle

 

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Trent Steel said:

yeah I supppose but surely maybe could of squeezed 15 ? i bet we didnt even haggle

 

Arsenal offered 5m which we didn’t accept so we haven’t just accepted the first bid that came along.

Edited by coolhandfox
  • Like 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, Trent Steel said:

we got ripped off there, 10 mill ? what a bargain they got

 

they stick him in the under 19s for a couple years and hell shine and they will either stick him in the 1st team or selll him for 30 mill, either way they win

So in a few years time he could be worth 30m but not now is that what you’re saying?

What’s he worth now?

Arsenal offered 5m no other club bid more than that other than the accepted bid from Man C.

We got 10m upfront + a further 2.5m in add ons + a % of any future sale. The rumoured sell on when Arsenal were negotiating was around 15% so if we use that and the potential 30m sale in a few years, on paper we have sold a 17yr old for £17m, a kid that only Arsenal had offered 5m for.

Once a kid wants to join the biggest club in the premier league it’s pretty hard to stop them, maybe we should have offered him the £67k per week he’s getting at Man C for the next 5yrs 🤷‍♂️ 

  • Like 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, Tommy Fresh said:

Monga has done us a favour, guessing he likely agreed to the pro deal with us agreeing to sell him afterwards

It’s a good deal all around. Monga got the exposure to mens football for a few years, we get an actual decent fee for him in comparison to Tribunal, Man City get a huge talent and hopefully we benefit further down the line with a nice sell on clause. 
 

Personally, think it’s a great deal for all involved.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Trent Steel said:

we got ripped off there, 10 mill ? what a bargain they got

 

they stick him in the under 19s for a couple years and hell shine and they will either stick him in the 1st team or selll him for 30 mill, either way they win

There’s also £2.5m in potential add ons. If we hit anywhere close to his potential and achieves them add ons, then gets sold for let’s say £30m.
 

Hopefully we’ve included a minimum sell on fee of 15%, that would bring the total deal to around £15.5m. You’re not getting much more for a young lad that wanted to move to the elite level.

 

You also forget that whether we like it or not big clubs like Man City can demand higher fee’s than a club like ours when selling players. 
 

Let’s stop forcing negativity it’s a good deal.

  • Like 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, Richmondfox said:

Monga hit the glass ceiling of the ability of the coaches.  More value would have been unlocked if we had coaching staff and managers that improved his playing style from skinning his mates to playing in a team and using the tricks to get out of danger. 

 

The price was decent for our situation and current reputation.  He needed to get out from the chaos.  

 

 

He's also going to be training with much better players at Man City each day so he should improve alot. 

 

It was a god deal for both, Arsenal offered a pittance but Monga doesn't look at the level of Dowman either. 

  • Like 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, trooky said:

He's also going to be training with much better players at Man City each day so he should improve alot. 

 

It was a god deal for both, Arsenal offered a pittance but Monga doesn't look at the level of Dowman either. 

He would’ve learnt more in an afternoon with Albrighton than a year being infected by our coaching staff, Ayew and Mav. 

Posted

Im not so sure going to clubs like man city are the best option for young lads. It can make sense when it works out but also there is so many others competing that you can easily get drowned/weeded out.

 

Wonder if these young lads would be better served going to established EPL teams that arent the top 6. More opportunity for actual first team starts, sub appearances. Then make a big money move to a team.like man city.

 

I know the problem though is that some of those epl teams will be priced out on wanting to pay the 10 mill for a possibility whereas man city can bleed with no consequences.

 

To each their own I suppose.

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Wymsey said:

Cue a loan to somewhere like Bradford or Plymouth...

See now here’s where it becomes sticky for him, he’s played in the premier league for us now where do Man C place him?

He’s not going to their 1st team so where, most 17yrs old will be getting Lge 2 or SCO loans but again he’s played in the premier league already so what League 1 where we are or Championship?

If League 1 that can turn the noise off for all the ‘we need to show a way through to the 1st team…’ slayers because I think I’ve mentioned he played in the premier Lge for us.

ok then the championship but he’s 17, I doubt there are many championship clubs willing to spend the money it will cost them & have the trust in him to perform week in week out as they need for a season, we have seen 1st hand what a Man City academy lad can do but also seen how inconsistent they are due to age.

 

I think his loan will prove losing Monga was nothing to do with that we as a club don’t show a path to the 1st team but for the draw of labelling yourself to a giant of a club.

Posted
8 hours ago, Trent Steel said:

yeah I supppose but surely maybe could of squeezed 15 ? i bet we didnt even haggle

 

We aren't in a strong position given us being in league 1 and the financial issues we have. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm not sure Monga was developed last year.The potential he was said to have exceeded his performances.

 

It was hard for him to live up to the performance of cultured veterans such as Ayew.

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...