Swarles Barkley Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 **** off twitter. Just **** off. Had bloody enough
Guest Col city fan Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 What's going on? I'm rubbish with all this twitter stuff...
Salieri Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 Shocking innit. It's painful to read. Someone mentions Danns and (despite the fact he probably has nothing to do with what may or may not be happening) people wade straight in with 'Danns is a disgrace' etc etc. I swear some on here will believe literally anything that is posted.
Happy Fox Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 Danns has been sleeping with NP's missus big news
Danizen Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 What the fook is happening? Also, that interpretation of the Vardy tweet is bonkers!
Trav Le Bleu Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 What is the first link, why is a crystal palace forum saying we have sacked pearson *cough* Neil *cough* Danns *cough*
Guest Bilo Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 St. Ledger nicked Danns' half chicken at Nando's and Pearson nutted him. There was a right mess. Peri-peri sauce up the walls and ceilings and everything.
Ashley Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 What's that mean? Are you suggesting he's been sacked Ashley? (I don't know what you mean) The shocking bit was about Danns, sorry I should of worded it better. Doubt I'll find anything out but I will try.
marty78 Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 What's going on? I'm rubbish with all this twitter stuff... Something, we don't know what, may or may not of happened.
Guest Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 St. Ledger nicked Danns' half chicken at Nando's and Pearson nutted him. There was a right mess. Peri-peri sauce up the walls and ceilings and everything.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 Something, we don't know what, may or may not have happened. AGAIN?!?!
AoWW Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 Bet it's Beckford. Does he move enough to cause an argument?
ScouseFox Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 I've got a feeling this is going to be one of my new favourite threads. I'm also not sure how allowed it is to have already accused a player of betting against us as some wild interpretation of some tweets.
foxfanazer Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 St. Ledger nicked Danns' half chicken at Nando's and Pearson nutted him. There was a right mess. Peri-peri sauce up the walls and ceilings and everything. I feel sorry for the kids (Schlupp, Moore)
bmt Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 Don't trust Bert anymore. Year ago I would have been shitting it but he's probs going to end up saying something like the hog roast people have pulled out the KP thinking he's amusing.
Guest ttfn Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 Something might have happened but I can't tell you what it was, who's involved and when it happened or if it has actually happened at all.
Fox92 Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 The shocking bit was about Danns, sorry I should of worded it better. Doubt I'll find anything out but I will try. Don't worry about it, I just read it wrong I think.
Kitchandro Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 vardy on about big brother -_- The fact he watches Big Brother is reason enough for Pearson to nut him.
Jaspa Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 Bet it's Beckford. Me too Make a big noise before you move them on, gives fans something to dwell on Stuff like this coming out doesnt bode well, I wish we would just sort our shambles out and move on instead of this constant tripe
Happy Fox Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 Ian Stringer â€@StringerSport No - RT @HarryGethins34: @StringerSport Has Pearson been sacked? #lcfc
Freeman's Wharfer Posted 29 August 2012 Posted 29 August 2012 Bert can't control the way you think and what you decide to think . He also doesn't decide the way you like to imply how things are interpreted. No-one has mentioned Pearson; if anything it's your own fault for always thinking the worse. So why not talk specifics? If something's known why the ambiguity? What is the need other than to get everyone scrambling to him to clear things up? Maybe names can't be mentioned, fair enough. By why not: a player has done x? The owners are considering doing y? Afterall he's already said two top sources have told him, it can't be at risk of getting someone caught out. There's clearly more than one person that knows. I just find the elusiveness annoying and coutner productive to anything other than him feeling that people are hanging on his every word/Tweet.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.